I wrote:
In the meantime, how about the following:
In default non-verbose mode, silently memoize
the list of packages that were not found. Then,
only if something goes wrong, say something like:
The package failed to build. Perhaps the reason
is that one of the following packages was not
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 02:07 +, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:44:46PM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
Those new to Cabal always seem to assume things are going badly when
happy not found. We need to address the psychological aspect
of Cabal's config process :)
On 07/01/07, Ross Paterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it's not enough to just say Ignore any errors above. Some packages
really do need happy (or some other tool) to build. Cabal would need to
crawl over the source files to see what preprocessors are really needed.
Even if we said
Ross Paterson wrote:
Cabal would need to crawl over the source files
to see what preprocessors are really needed.
Duncan Coutts wrote:
Yes, this is exactly what Cabal should do.
In the meantime, how about the following:
In default non-verbose mode, silently memoize
the list of packages
Hi
In the meantime, how about the following:
In default non-verbose mode, silently memoize
the list of packages that were not found. Then,
only if something goes wrong, say something like:
The package failed to build. Perhaps the reason
is that one of the following packages was not found:
tphyahoo wrote:
Very, very helpful Chris; thanks; and thanks also to the many other helpful
haskellers.
They have (hopefully working) cabal files to make compiling and installing
ea\
sy.
Unfortunately, not so easy, for PCRE.regex. But hopefully this is just due
to my ignorance and
On 06/01/07, Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running --configure notices that many things are not installed, but this is just
noise from Cabal.
This is the second time I've seen someone get confused by these
messages. I propose we add a 'Configuration successful, now type
runhaskell
dmhouse:
On 06/01/07, Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running --configure notices that many things are not installed, but this
is just
noise from Cabal.
This is the second time I've seen someone get confused by these
messages. I propose we add a 'Configuration successful, now
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:44:46PM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
dmhouse:
On 06/01/07, Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running --configure notices that many things are not installed, but this
is just noise from Cabal.
This is the second time I've seen someone get
Donald Bruce Stewart writes:
dmhouse:
This is the second time I've seen someone get confused by these
messages. I propose we add a 'Configuration successful, now type
runhaskell Setup.hs build.' to the bottom of the configure output.
I agree. This issue is even mentioned here:
Em Dom, 2007-01-07 às 02:07 +, Ross Paterson escreveu:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:44:46PM +1100, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
dmhouse:
On 06/01/07, Chris Kuklewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running --configure notices that many things are not installed, but this
is just noise from
11 matches
Mail list logo
