Please note that it may be hard to make a
print out of a wikibook. You might want to
use Docbook/XML or Latex in a darcs repo-
sitory instead.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:23:13PM -0500, Matt Revelle wrote:
Sorry, wasn't sure I had clearly expressed that it's possible to have
an open book end up
A quick search turned up Lulu (http://www.lulu.com/).
From the Lulu site:
Publish and sell easily within minutes.
No set-up fees. No minimum order.
Keep control of the rights.
Set your own price.
Each product is printed as it is ordered.
No excess inventory.
Looks like they offer hardcover
On 12/11/06, Matt Revelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A quick search turned up Lulu (http://www.lulu.com/).
From the Lulu site:
Publish and sell easily within minutes.
No set-up fees. No minimum order.
Keep control of the rights.
Set your own price.
Each product is printed as it is ordered.
No
Well, perhaps if nothing else, we could use a wikibook to
collaboratively work on the structure of such a book, and then from
that you could publish a real book. I don't really know the legal
issues, though. I am thinking of several books though which have been
written and released both as full
On 12/11/06, Andrew Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, perhaps if nothing else, we could use a wikibook to
collaboratively work on the structure of such a book, and then from
that you could publish a real book. I don't really know the legal
issues, though. I am thinking of several books
What do you mean by real publisher? As long as the quality of the
final product is good, does it really matter what publishing company
has their name stamped on it?
I'm not sure about Lulu and distribution, but there's also BookSurge
(http://www.booksurge.com) which is owned by Amazon. From
On 12/11/06, Matt Revelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by real publisher? As long as the quality of the
final product is good, does it really matter what publishing company
has their name stamped on it?
It matters to me; if I'm going to put work into this, then that's what
I
Well, I'm not opposed at all to a written final form. I guess I just
don't see that and using a wikibook to assist in our collaboration as
mutually exclusive. Anyway, I'd love to help in any such project. By
the way, I seem to be messing up the threads. What is considered the
correct way to reply
On 12/11/06, Andrew Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm not opposed at all to a written final form. I guess I just
don't see that and using a wikibook to assist in our collaboration as
mutually exclusive.
I think the confusion is my fault. I assumed that you (if it was you
who originally
I have taken the liberty to read into the definition of practical
Haskell; if I'm off target let me know so I can tweak my claims to
fit whatever it is I thought I was discussing ;).
Two cents:
1) This wouldn't be the first book introducing functional programming
to imperative programmers. It
Sorry, wasn't sure I had clearly expressed that it's possible to have
an open book end up as a dead-tree book.
Either way, I'm interested in helping.
On 12/11/06, Kirsten Chevalier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It matters to me; if I'm going to put work into this, then that's what
I want the
Ok, well I think we can all agree that such a book is a good idea. I
suggest we take the discussion to some kind of collaboration tool.
It's pretty hard to do just on this mailing list. There are a lot of
options, such as finding a forum somewhere, creating a wiki book
somewhere and having a
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 13:42 -0600, Nicolas Frisby wrote:
Two cents:
Two (Croatian) lipas, much less than two cents :-(
3) This would be the first book introducing the nuances of large
systems development in Haskell to Haskell programmers. Explaining well
various monads (e.g. how to use
On 12/11/06, Andrew Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, well I think we can all agree that such a book is a good idea. I
suggest we take the discussion to some kind of collaboration tool.
It's pretty hard to do just on this mailing list. There are a lot of
options, such as finding a forum
G'day all.
Quoting Kirsten Chevalier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I suppose I should have clarified that I meant a dead-trees book with
a real publisher, [...]
Something more like this, then:
http://phptr.com/perens
Maybe we should come up with an outline and a sample chapter or two, then
talk to
On 12/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all.
Quoting Kirsten Chevalier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I suppose I should have clarified that I meant a dead-trees book with
a real publisher, [...]
Something more like this, then:
http://phptr.com/perens
Maybe we should come up
16 matches
Mail list logo
