Hello Andrew,
Saturday, December 15, 2007, 1:17:56 PM, you wrote:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Status/Nov07
Thanks for posting that. I was unaware of that link, and it was very
interesting reading.
+1.
obviously it's made for forthcoming HCAR but wasn't announced separately
--
Hello Robin,
Saturday, December 15, 2007, 9:54:43 PM, you wrote:
you may believe in what you want. i prefer to say about real
situation. if it will be possible to quickly write good Haskell
compiler, it was be written many years ago
No-one is writing a commercial Haskell compiler yet
Hello Neil,
Saturday, December 15, 2007, 10:07:54 PM, you wrote:
I agree with Bulat that Haskell has, if anything, even better
optimisation potential than something like C. With Haskell you can do
the crazy high-level optimisations that things like C would demand
really advanced
Hello Don,
Saturday, December 15, 2007, 10:57:02 PM, you wrote:
Do you have the single loop C program, btw? I'd be curious to see if
this is really feasible. It would have to do the buffering, tokenising
and accumulating in one go. I'd imagine it is a bit hairy.
for (int n; n = read (0, buf,
Hello Don,
Saturday, December 15, 2007, 11:28:00 PM, you wrote:
Do you have the single loop C program, btw? I'd be curious to see if
Oh, this isn't the original program, either. You need to find the
longest word and print it. Not count the words.
i can't understand what you mean by
Hello Andrew,
Sunday, December 16, 2007, 1:39:02 AM, you wrote:
Takes 0.016 seconds to process a 2.4 MB file. [But not the same one Don
used.]
This version takes 0.005 seconds.
Don, it seems to be bound by memory speed rather than quality of generated
code. i suggest you to test it on fixed
Hello Dan,
Friday, December 14, 2007, 11:57:38 PM, you wrote:
to allocate registers do exist. So I'm looking forward to the next
version of GHC matching C's performance for inner loops of array
manipulation code :-)
with support of loop unrolling, smart register allocation, strength
reducing
On 12/14/07, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dan,
Friday, December 14, 2007, 11:57:38 PM, you wrote:
to allocate registers do exist. So I'm looking forward to the next
version of GHC matching C's performance for inner loops of array
manipulation code :-)
with support of
