Claus Reinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. there are no systems where packages just work!
there are systems where a few people ensure that
many people can live in such an illusion, though.
Exactly. Integrating Cabal packages into the system package manager
is still non-trivial, and a
I think that's fundamentally the wrong approach. We shouldn't have to
build a Haskell installation manager. Would you also want installation
managers for Perl, Python, Ruby, C, C++, etc. each with their own different
user interfaces and feature sets? I think not - you want a single package
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 15:14 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
I think that's fundamentally the wrong approach. We shouldn't have to
build a Haskell installation manager. Would you also want installation
managers for Perl, Python, Ruby, C, C++, etc. each with their own different
user
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Claus Reinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- it isn't sufficient to worry about installation management,
one has to worry about integration, lifetime and uninstall
management as well. in short, maintain the dependency
graphs over any of
