[Moving to cafe, this is only barely Haskell-related.]
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 04:16:36PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eval of the kind
let x = 1 in eval x
is plainly an abomination.
I agree, though not because of the optimization issues but rather
as a matter of principle: a closed
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lauri Alanko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nevertheless, this abomination is supported even by some scheme
implementations:
guile (define local-environment (procedure-syntax (lambda (exp env) env)))
guile (define (eval-where-x-bound exp)
... (let ((x 'foo))
Karl M Syring wrote:
Antoine Utonium wrote on Sat, 31 May 2003 13:29:09 +0200:
I recently asked you who knows how to link haskell-made code to C apps, or
call haskell code from C code, or encapsulate, traduce, Haskell code in C
code.
I just want to use haskell when I need advanced
Karl M Syring wrote:
Antoine Utonium wrote on Sat, 31 May 2003 13:29:09 +0200:
I recently asked you who knows how to link haskell-made code to C
apps, or call haskell code from C code, or encapsulate, traduce,
Haskell code in C code.
I just want to use haskell when I need advanced algorithms,
[We now have lost all pretence of topicality]
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 08:43:03PM -0700, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
Guile seems to be a bit sloppy in general. I think it just keeps a
dictionary of symbol bindings and passes it around at runtime.
guile (eval '(define b 5))
guile b
5
This
On Saturday 31 May 2003 12:29 pm, Antoine Utonium wrote:
I recently asked you who knows how to link haskell-made code to C apps, or
call haskell code from C code, or encapsulate, traduce, Haskell code in C
code.
I just want to use haskell when I need advanced algorithms, C for I/O,
and GUI
Hallo,
I have the following problem:
my program asks the user for a command, when the command is executed a
new command is asked (this is no problem ; an example is in the HUgs
distribution namely Main.hs in the Prolog example.
However one of the commands is: read filename
i.e. read a file and
