-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I heard only rumors, but isn't Lisp supposed to be just that? A
programmable programming language?
Peter Verswyvelen schrieb:
This is all very cool stuff, but sometimes I wander if it isn't possible
to drop the special languages for fiddling
I'm trying to install wxhaskell in ubuntu feisty, with ghc-6.6.
After several days of trial and error and a few hours trying to
change all types in my program to gtk2hs types, I'm tired.
Does anyone have a .deb for wxhaskell that works with ghc-6.6?
Hi Iván,
Try this:
* install GHC and darcs:
sudo apt-get install ghc6
sudo apt-get install darcs
* install WxWidgets 2.6
sudo apt-get install libwxgtk2.6-dev
sudo apt-get install freeglut3-dev
sudo apt-get install g++
* install wxHaskell
darcs get
You may also find this function helpful. I'll let you work out why/how:
uncurry :: (a - b - c) - (a, b) - c
uncurry f p = f (fst p) (snd p)
On 9/13/07, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:45:02AM +0100, PR Stanley wrote:
5. Using merge, define a
Aaron Denney wrote:
If you want expect like functionality, i.e. working for arbitrary
client programs, you'll need to use pseudottys, as expect, script,
screen, xterm, etc. do.
I packaged up a patch for System.Posix to add this a month or three ago,
but forgot to follow through on it.
PS: And, no, you won't be able to set breakpoints in type-level
programs...
Yet.
Stefan
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
I'm not sure, I don't know LISP in detail, but as far as I know, LISP is
a fully dynamic language.
I actually meant a static language where you build your own strong types
using the language itself. On the micro level, the language only knows
abouts bits and bytes without semantics, just like
Peter Verswyvelen writes:
I'm not sure, I don't know LISP in detail, but as far as I know, LISP
is a fully dynamic language.
I actually meant a static language where you build your own strong
types using the language itself.
[...]
You might be interested in the Qi language[1].
Qi is
I have a matrix library written in C and interfaced into Haskell with a lot
of additional Haskell
support. The C library of course has a lot of side effects and actually
ties into the BLAS libraries, thus at the present time, most of the
interesting calls are done in the IO monad. I have no
Hi Stuart.
Thanks for your advice about thunk, though I do not understand *thunk*
very well. Is there any other discriptions about thunk ?
I have tried the *seq* operation. When input is 10,000,000, the memory
still leak, and there is still a stack overflow.
I changed some mapM_ to sequence .
On Sep 14, 2007, at 21:35 , L.Guo wrote:
Thanks for your advice about thunk, though I do not understand *thunk*
very well. Is there any other discriptions about thunk ?
A thunk is, in general, a piece of code which represents a
suspended or delayed action. In Haskell, it represents a lazy
As long as the FFI calls don't make destructive updates to existing
matrices, you can do what you want.
For example, assuming you have:
-- adds the second matrix to the first overwrites the first
matrixAddIO :: MatrixIO - MatrixIO - IO ()
-- creates a new copy of a matrix
matrixCopyIO ::
Ryan Ingram wrote:
As long as the FFI calls don't make destructive updates to existing
matrices, you can do what you want.
For example, assuming you have:
-- adds the second matrix to the first overwrites the first
matrixAddIO :: MatrixIO - MatrixIO - IO ()
-- creates a new copy
SevenThunders wrote:
I have a matrix library written in C and interfaced into Haskell
with a lot of additional Haskell support.
[snip]
Unfortunately if I wrap my matrix references in the IO monad, then
at best computations like S = A + B are themselves IO computations
and thus whenever they
I could see it as a useful abstraction instead of directly generating
assembly. To me the idea behind llvm seems nice and clean and academic to a
certain degree. It can see it as something to look out for in the future.
On 9/13/07, brad clawsie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has anyone ever
15 matches
Mail list logo
