On 9/11/10 10:36 PM, Ertugrul Soeylemez wrote:
It should print the string, if the computation isn't aborted, i.e. if
the last continuation, which you specify as an argument to runContT is
reached.
Greets,
Ertugrul
That's true, it just seems to me like at that point the spirit of the
Hello Haskellers,
Having been pretty much impressed by Don Stewart's Practical Haskell
(http://donsbot.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/practical-haskell/), I
started to write a Haskell script to run maven jobs (yes, I know...).
In the course of undertaking this fantastic endeavour, I started to
use the
Hi,
I would like to benchmark C/C++ and Haskell code. The goal is to
improve the Haskell port[0] of smallpt[1].
To make sure my approach was reliable, I got the code of two programs
(one in C, the other in Haskell) from a post[2] by Don. The code is
reproduced below. When timing the execution of
Vo Minh Thu wrote:
Hi,
I would like to benchmark C/C++ and Haskell code. The goal is to
improve the Haskell port[0] of smallpt[1].
To make sure my approach was reliable, I got the code of two programs
(one in C, the other in Haskell) from a post[2] by Don. The code is
reproduced below. When
2010/9/12 Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com:
Vo Minh Thu wrote:
Hi,
I would like to benchmark C/C++ and Haskell code. The goal is to
improve the Haskell port[0] of smallpt[1].
To make sure my approach was reliable, I got the code of two programs
(one in C, the other in Haskell)
michael rice schrieb:
Which of these would be more costly for a long list?
f :: [Int] - [Int]
f [x] = [x]
f (x:xs) = x + (head xs) : f xs
f :: [Int] - [Int]
f [x] = [x]
f (x:y:xs) = x + y : f (y:xs)
What about empty lists? How about
zipWith (+) xs (drop 1 xs ++ [0]) ?
Since I often
Hi Henning,
Thanks for the tip, I'll check it out.
A related but more general question: on average, what's more efficient, pattern
matching or function calls?
Michael
--- On Sun, 9/12/10, Henning Thielemann schlepp...@henning-thielemann.de
wrote:
From: Henning Thielemann
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
- when recompiling a package with ABI changes, does cabal always
update dependent packages?
It never recompiles them. Recompilation should not be needed, because
different versions of packages exports different symbols, so a package
can never be linked
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
$ cabal install --dry cabal-install leksah-0.8.0.6
[... does not work ...]
However, trying to install cabal-install and leksah separately works quite well.
So do install them separately.
cabal install p1 p2 is supposed to find a single consistent install
Paolo,
The problem with mult is that k is not specified unambiguously. You either
need v to determine k (which is probably not what you want, at a guess), mult
to take a dummy argument that determines what k is:
[...]
or, to make Tensor a data family instead of a type family.
What is the
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 15:30, Tillmann Rendel
ren...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote:
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
$ cabal install --dry cabal-install leksah-0.8.0.6
[... does not work ...]
However, trying to install cabal-install and leksah separately works quite
well.
So do install them
On Sep 12, 2:51 am, wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
On 9/11/10 3:43 PM, Daniel Fischer wrote:
- is there a specification of which are the core packages?
core as in *do not update*?
Basically, what comes with GHC shouldn't be updated.
Though I heard updating Cabal was okay.
I
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Gregory Crosswhite
gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
That's true, it just seems to me like at that point the spirit of the
continuation monad is being violated since the final continuation is never
actually called. That isn't necessarily a big deal, but it is
Hi!
First, sorry for some confusion - I wanted to post further details
needed for the analysis in the mail I lost, and I had excluded them
from my summary to keep it short.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 15:26, Tillmann Rendel
ren...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote:
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
Users may not want to edit the files directly, but they'll be happy to be
able to open them with proper syntax highlighting, for example.
JP
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Henning Thielemann
schlepp...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
JP Moresmau schrieb:
Hello fellow Haskellers,
In
Dear Haskellers,
Derek asked me if I could give a 5 minute talk at AngloHaskell last
Friday about the Darcs project. It took an hour and a half.
I've redone the talk on YouTube, basically just stepping through the
slides and talking over them. It's about an hour long and you
can watch it here:
Hi Paolo,
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
cabal install p1 p2 is supposed to find a single consistent install plan for
p1 and p2 and the transitive dependencies of either of them. This is useful
if you plan to use p1 and p2 in a single project.
Ahah! Then it's a feature. The need for consistency stems
I experienced a following problem while dealing with some text processing.
I have a text and want to get the same text with parts enclosed into {} or
[] stripped away. Substituting them with a ' ' would also work.
Here is the code I wrote (T is Data.Text):
stripBrackets :: T.Text - T.Text
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 19:33:56 +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
PS: the talk segments are:
I missed a segment!
1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUytayyTGTU
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXjTmWD81JA
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lXOD3fLwU8
4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aueSoZShobo
5.
On Sunday 12 September 2010 21:23:50, Petr Prokhorenkov wrote:
I experienced a following problem while dealing with some text
processing.
I have a text and want to get the same text with parts enclosed into {}
or [] stripped away. Substituting them with a ' ' would also work.
Here is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/11/10 13:46 , Henning Thielemann wrote:
Would it be better to write canlib in a way that works on both Windows
and Unix? Otherwise all packages that import canlib have to add this switch.
The phrasing of the original request leads me to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/11/10 15:43 , Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Saturday 11 September 2010 20:38:21, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
- is there a specification of which are the core packages?
core as in *do not update*?
Basically, what comes with GHC shouldn't be updated.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Petr Prokhorenkov
prokhoren...@gmail.comwrote:
I experienced a following problem while dealing with some text processing.
Thanks for the report and the test case. There's nothing wrong with your
code - read on for details.
You ran into one of the few
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com wrote:
text 0.8.1.0 is now up on hackage, with the fix included. Enjoy!
Wow! That was fast! =)
--
Felipe.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Hi, all!
Now, with the approaching new Hackage server, I thought that to organize
packages into subcategories would be useful. Categories like System or
Text, with almost 200 packages, make more difficult to find what you
want. Data category has currently 326 packages, many of them with very
Perhaps, this is madness, but I wanted to read other opinions on this topic.
Packages already have multiple tags, right? So how about a search box
that uses ANDed tags (in addition to description etc), and a browsing
interface where you can see tags of packages matching the current
search, and
On 13 September 2010 11:37, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps, this is madness, but I wanted to read other opinions on this topic.
Packages already have multiple tags, right? So how about a search box
that uses ANDed tags (in addition to description etc), and a browsing
interface
El Lun, 13 de Septiembre de 2010, 3:37 am, Evan Laforge escribió:
That might be easier than trying to fit everything into one hierarchy.
Some packages can go in more than one place.
I have not contradicted that. A package can go somewhere. For example:
CAT. A
* SUBCAT. A1
** Pack. 1
*
Hi!
I run multiple threads where I would like that exception from any of
them (and main) propagate to others but at the same time that they can
gracefully cleanup after themselves (even if this means not exiting).
I have this code to try, but cleanup functions (stop) are interrupted.
How can I
29 matches
Mail list logo
