https://plus.google.com/u/0/111705054912446689620/posts/DPdA2rUSQ6c
Comments are welcome!
Kevin
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Hi all,
One question to more experienced GSoC'ers. I do understand that this is
important to find mentors in advance.
As soon as I think nowadays it is critical for the programming language
ecosystem to handle BigData [1], have a proposal to implement HDFS [1]
support for CloudHaskell [2] with
I apologize,
But does hackage.haskell.org being down for some hours already has
something with the process of bringing up Hackage 2?
Kind regards,
Kirill Zaborsky
P.S. Previous mail was rejected by maillist
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Andrei Varanovich wrote:
One question to more experienced GSoC'ers. I do understand that this is
important to find mentors in advance.
As soon as I think nowadays it is critical for the programming language
ecosystem to handle BigData [1], have a proposal to implement HDFS [1]
support for
Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
What's the time frame for project proposals? I have two ideas in my head
that I think are unusually cool. To make a successful SOC project, they need
a bit of preparation on my part, though, so I'm wondering how much time I
have to implement a proof
I would use bounded STM channels (from the stm-chans package) for
communication; this would keep the producer from getting too far ahead
of the converters. You'd need to tag items as they're produced (an
Integer should be fine) also, and keep track of the tags. A TVar
should suffice for that.
Hello,
i stumbled upon the specification of the Enum instances of Floats,
Doubles and Rationals. I understand the idea behind this specification
for floating point numbers. But why was it also used for Rational? As
Rationals are exact, it would make sense to use the same definition of
ranges as
Kevin Jardine notices the full Haskell ecosystem ... is huge, and
laments the absence of a sophisticated IDE to help manage it.
Being a small-code type, I don't personally enjoy IDE's, which
are undeniably useful in big projects, at the cost of a whole lot
more to learn about programmering in
What about hoogle/hayoo and hackage?
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Doug McIlroy d...@cs.dartmouth.edu wrote:
Kevin Jardine notices the full Haskell ecosystem ... is huge, and
laments the absence of a sophisticated IDE to help manage it.
Being a small-code type, I don't personally enjoy
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Doug McIlroy d...@cs.dartmouth.edu wrote:
Nevertheless, I share Jardine's concern about the central problem.
It is hard to find one's way in this ecosystem. It needn't be,
as Java illustrates. To my mind Java's great contribution to the
world is its library
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:59:27 -0800 (PST), Kirill Zaborsky qri...@gmail.com
wrote:
I apologize,
But does hackage.haskell.org being down for some hours already has
something with the process of bringing up Hackage 2?
Nope, it will be some time before we are in a position to touch
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:06:16 +, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 14 February 2012 01:53, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Ben,
snip
Ah, here's the link to my last go at getting people to self-organise.
On 02/14/2012 04:13 PM, Doug McIlroy wrote:
Nevertheless, I share Jardine's concern about the central problem.
It is hard to find one's way in this ecosystem. It needn't be,
as Java illustrates.
As a professional Java developer this sounds really strange, but maybe I
just haven't found it
Johan Tibell wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a heads-up that this year's Google of Code is kicking off. My
experience from the last few years is that we can maximize the output we
get from GSoC by being proactive and writing down semi-detailed
explanations of what kind of projects we'd like to see,
Hi,
2012/2/14 Doug McIlroy d...@cs.dartmouth.edu
Kevin Jardine notices the full Haskell ecosystem ... is huge, and
laments the absence of a sophisticated IDE to help manage it.
Being a small-code type, I don't personally enjoy IDE's, which
are undeniably useful in big projects, at the cost
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:52, Greg Weber g...@gregweber.info wrote:
That being said, I would like to have a Template Haskell interface
instead of just a QQ interface. The reason why we haven't bothered
with doing that ourselves is because the record name-spacing issue
makes the current QQ
Hi Deian,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention - this is a neat project! It
actually looks *exactly* like persistent - I can't actually discern a
meaningful difference, although likely your internals are slightly
simpler if you only support MongoDB. If your goals are to support
multiple
Hi Greg,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention - this is a neat project! It
actually looks *exactly* like persistent - I can't actually discern a
meaningful difference, although likely your internals are slightly
simpler if you only support MongoDB. If your goals are to support
multiple
I'm confused: I'm using GHC 7.0.2 and Cabal 1.10.1.0 with
cabal-install 0.10.2. I use -Wall in my Cabal file. If I build a
Haskell file with unused do binds, via the GHC API I get no warning,
which is normal, since the doc states: The warnings that are not
enabled by -Wall are ...,
I put Network Version 2.3.0.10 compiled for ghc.7.4.1 Windows (this
time without runtime errors) in the address refereed above. Just in
case someone want to avoid cabal configure-build and just want to
cabal install.
2012/2/13 Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com:
Resending as the last message
I'm trying to build a Haskell project[1] which appears to be dependent
on an function in a old version of base (GHC.Handle.fillReadBuffer).
I've downgraded to Haskell platform 2010.2.0.0 which comes with GHC
6.12.3 (installed by homebrew on MacOS X 10.6.8), and ghc-pkg appears
to indicate the
Hi all,
I'm debugging an issue with multithreading and FFI calls in 7.4.1. The code
in question is the zeromq3-haskell library, which provides an FFI binding
to ZeroMQ.
A little background: ZeroMQ gives the programmer contexts and sockets.
Contexts are thread-safe and generally used
Out of curiosity, do we know why the Language Shootout has
upgradedhttp://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/program.php?test=spectralnormlang=ghcid=4to
GHC 7.4.1, but still isn't using -fllvm for e.g. the spectral-norm
benchmark? (It results in a nonnegligible speedup on my machine.)
Louis
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Steven J. Murdoch
steven.murd...@cl.cam.ac.uk wrote:
$ ghc-pkg list base
/Users/ghc6/homebrew/Cellar/ghc/6.12.3/lib/ghc/package.conf.d
base-3.0.3.2
base-4.2.0.2
I'm a bit fuzzy on the details when it comes to the core packages that
are distributed with
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Rogan Creswick cresw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Steven J. Murdoch
steven.murd...@cl.cam.ac.uk wrote:
$ ghc-pkg list base
/Users/ghc6/homebrew/Cellar/ghc/6.12.3/lib/ghc/package.conf.d
base-3.0.3.2
base-4.2.0.2
I'm a bit fuzzy
On 15 February 2012 00:16, Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:06:16 +, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 14 February 2012 01:53, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Ben,
snip
Ah, here's the link to my last go at
Markus: What about hoogle/hayoo and hackage?
Antoine: Do you have any links to examples that we should imitate?
Hackage is notionally similar to the Java API documentation at
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/
But Hackage Documentation pages typically only give syntax,
Most docs ([1], [2]) about do-notation syntactic sugar tends to
describe following expressions as equivalent:
do { a; b; c } and a b c, but they are not: first one gets
de-sugared into a (b c), second one is equivalent to (a
b) c, because () is declared using infixl.
This should not be
In the source file, the Haddock documentation is there, no idea why it
doesn't show up.
Am 15.02.2012 04:00 schrieb Doug McIlroy d...@cs.dartmouth.edu:
Markus: What about hoogle/hayoo and hackage?
Antoine: Do you have any links to examples that we should imitate?
Hackage is notionally
On 15 February 2012 17:55, Aristid Breitkreuz arist...@googlemail.com wrote:
In the source file, the Haddock documentation is there, no idea why it
doesn't show up.
Looks like it's an issue with getting the Haddock markup from another
package, though I've usually had this work before... e.g.
30 matches
Mail list logo
