That´s very good.
What tecnology, libraries etc did you use?
2012/5/3 Gintautas Miliauskas gintau...@miliauskas.lt:
Hello,
check out http://haskellonline.org, an online Haskell typechecker. It
is essentially a thin web wrapper over ghc, but it takes some friction
out of learning Haskell, if
Well actually, unless you _really_ need paramterizable indexes (i.e. not
only Ints) I don't see reasons to prefer array to vector now.
2012/5/4 Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com
Hi Morten,
If speed is really important I would go with the vector package. It
has a more modern API and better
Dear Kazu,
Could you please answer my concerns about the license under which LYAH
is distributed? (see my initial reply to the thread)
Additionally, under what license is your translation work re-distributed?
Sorry if this has been addressed already.
Best regards,
- Valentin
On Thu, May 3,
On 12-05-04 07:03 PM, Станислав Черничкин wrote:
Hi, guys, I'm interested in best practices in using of each approach.
Personally I like MonadError because it is more explicit and
Control.Exception-s becomes really ugly in complex scenarios.
[...]
User has to deal with
both, but have no
New to haskell and having issues resolving packages, have the following output
below and can't seem to resolve it.
Text seems to have diff hash dependancies when I try and instal a diff version
of 0.11.2.0 etc
Any ideas on what todo ??
Thanks
$ ghc-pkg check
There are problems in package
Hello,
Could you please answer my concerns about the license under which LYAH
is distributed? (see my initial reply to the thread)
Additionally, under what license is your translation work re-distributed?
What I know is:
- The Japanese publisher bought the translation license from the
