On 24 September 2013 22:38, Duncan Coutts dun...@well-typed.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Having been running the Hackage 2 alpha beta for several months we
intend to do the final switchover tomorrow (Wednesday 25th Sept).
This will involve disabling uploads to the old server for a few hours
On 24 September 2013 22:38, Duncan Coutts dun...@well-typed.com wrote:
For issues with accounts or permissions please contact the
administrators by email at adm...@hackage.haskell.org
Sorry, that should be: ad...@hackage.haskell.org
Ie singular admin, not plural. I got myself confused because
tracker:
https://github.com/haskell/hackage-server/issues
For issues with accounts or permissions please contact the
administrators by email at adm...@hackage.haskell.org
--
Duncan Coutts, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 14:57 +0200, Alejandro Serrano Mena wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at the packages blaze-builder and bytestring, and both provide
builders for ByteString.
Which one should I use? In which situations is one more convenient than the
other?
I'd say the usual answer here would be
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 12:10 +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:23:59PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Well-Typed and the Industrial Haskell Group (IHG) are very pleased to
announce that Hackage 2 is now available for public beta testing. The
plan is to do the final
on freenode.
[code]:https://github.com/haskell/hackage-server
[github wiki]: https://github.com/haskell/hackage-server/wiki
[cabal-devel]: http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
--
Duncan Coutts, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 14:32 +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error when I try to upload gf-3.5.tar.gz [1] to Hackage.
400 Error in upload
could not extract gf-3.5 directory from gf-3.5.tar.gz
I get the same error when I try to Check the previous
projects (Dan Rosen's repositories, for
instance). Is there anything in between - mature, but not abandoned?
We did an implementation of the contracts idea for one of our customers
which is available (under AGPL or commercial license) on github:
https://github.com/netrium/Netrium
--
Duncan
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 17:48 +0100, Colin Adams wrote:
I thought the OP was talking about software contracts (as in Eiffel /
Design By Contract ).
Oh oops, you're right. SPJ has too many papers about contracts! :-)
On 7 August 2013 16:15, Duncan Coutts dun...@well-typed.com wrote:
On Mon
fit for the job, and
attach your CV. Please also indicate how soon you might be able to
start. We are more than happy to answer informal enquiries. Contact
Duncan Coutts, Ian Lynagh or Andres Löh for further information, either
by email or IRC.
To ensure we can properly consider your application
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 00:52 +0200, Gábor Lehel wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.comwrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
I address it briefly in my thesis [1], Section 4.8.2. I think it's
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 20:19 +0200, Gábor Lehel wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. I looked at your thesis previously, but only
read through a couple of sections (including the one about concatMap). I
might go through the state machine parts as well now that I know the
significance/relevance.
: June 10-11th, 2013
* Advanced Course: June 12-13th, 2013
* Early bird discount before April 29th
--
Duncan Coutts, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 18:07 -0700, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
Hello all, (cc'd stream fusion paper authors)
I noticed that the current implementation of stream fusion does
not support multiple-return stream combinators, e.g.
break :: (a - Bool) - [a] - ([a], [a]). I thought a little
bit about
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 10:56 -0700, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
I address it briefly in my thesis [1], Section 4.8.2. I think it's a
fundamental limitation of stream fusion.
See also concat, where
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 20:44 +0200, David Sabel wrote:
A very interesting discussion, I may add my 2 cents:
making unsafeInterleaveIO nondeterministic indeed seems to make it safe,
more or less this was proved in our paper:
On 13 January 2013 20:27, Petr P petr@gmail.com wrote:
to the cabal file. Now cabal sdist complains with:
'ghc-options: -O2' is rarely needed. Check that it is giving a real
benefit and not just imposing longer compile times on your users.
I wonder:
(1) Is there a way how to
On 6 October 2012 17:25, José Lopes jose.lo...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
OK.
But, wouldn't it be possible for xmobar to use mtl-2.0.1.0 and for parsec to
use mtl-2.1.1, while xmobar would use this parsec version?
In this case, I am assuming that mtl-2.0.1.0 and mtl-2.1.1 are considered
two different
On 3 October 2012 18:22, José Lopes jose.lo...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
Hey,
I have debian 6.0.5 with GHC version 6.12.1 and base version
4.2.0.0 (although base 3.0.3.2 is also installed).
I've pushed a fix for this. We'll wait a couple days to give a chance
for other issues to be discovered, and
On 25 June 2012 02:04, Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote:
Dear all,
while doing some benchmarking (*)
I noticed that function s1 is considerably faster than s2
(but I wanted s2 because it looks more natural)
(for n = 1, s1 takes 20 s, s2 takes 13 s; compiled by
On 29 May 2012 11:49, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
Good question.. I copied both to a file and tried ghc-core, but it
inlines big chunks of Data.Vector and I can't read it very well, but
it looks like the answer is no, it still builds the the list of sums.
I guess the next step is to
how to do this could configure it.
In trying to answer the above question I found this long email thread
from 1.5 years ago. Duncan said the following:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's certainly what we've been planning
Good work David.
I used to do something like this for Cabal regression testing but the
method I used didn't scale well as hackage grew. I'll look into using
your tool next time for testing a major Cabal / cabal-install release.
Duncan
On 23 April 2012 21:37, David Terei dave.te...@gmail.com
On 14 February 2012 10:43, Kirill Zaborsky qri...@gmail.com wrote:
I apologize,
But does hackage.haskell.org being down for some hours already has something
with the process of bringing up Hackage 2?
No, completely independent. The server was down for a few hours (and I
think restored in the
Hi Ben,
On 13 February 2012 23:44, Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Those of you who follow the Haskell subreddit no doubt saw today's post
regarding the status of Hackage 2. As has been said many times in the
past, the primary blocker at this point to the adoption of
On 14 February 2012 01:53, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Ben,
On 13 February 2012 23:44, Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
Those of you who follow the Haskell subreddit no doubt saw today's post
regarding the status of Hackage 2. As has been said many
On 10 February 2012 12:06, Henning Thielemann
lemm...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
I have uploaded three packages to Hackage that shall simplify maintaining
cabal packages under darcs revision control. They simplify tasks like
uploading packages after some tests, cabal version handling,
On 10 February 2012 14:00, Henning Thielemann
lemm...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Would you mind giving me a breif explanation of the compiling
multiple local packages in the right order feature? I'd like to
understand what is missing in cabal
On 9 February 2012 10:59, Aleksey Khudyakov alexey.sklad...@gmail.com wrote:
So is it possible to use the fast and efficient mersenne generator with
the convenient and general random API?
I think design of Random type class basically precludes efficient generators
with large periods and
On 18 November 2011 13:17, Daniel Fischer
daniel.is.fisc...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Friday 18 November 2011, 13:05:06, Yves Parès wrote:
...so there is no way to do that inside the function passed to
modifySTRef? In other words, there is no way to ensure inside a
function that its result will
directly with the
participating organisations and the Simons at GHC HQ. If you think your
organisation may be interested then get in touch with me via
i...@well-typed.com
[1]
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/parallel/remote.pdf
--
Duncan Coutts, Haskell Consultant
Well
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 19:30 +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Duncan Coutts schrieb:
Several people have asked about the new host key. Yes, there is a new
RSA host key for the community server, the fingerprint of which is:
21:b8:59:ff:39:69:58:7a:51:ef:c1:d8:c6:24:6e:f7
ssh
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 02:12 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
We have not yet re-enabled user login accounts, nor re-enabled access
to code repositories. We will send a further update when these are
re-enabled, or procedures for people to re-enable them are finalised.
Logging
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 01:33 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
All,
As you will be aware, some of the *.haskell.org websites have been down
recently, specifically:
code.haskell.org
trac.haskell.org
projects.haskell.org
planet.haskell.org
community.haskell.org
[...]
We have not yet re
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 03:47 +1300, Vivian McPhail wrote:
license: Foo, Bar
Could this be computed automatically from the source files by Cabal?
I would not want to rely on that.
Looking specifically at hmatrix, there are three kinds of modules
i) bindings to GSLGPL
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 18:35 -0500, Dan Knapp wrote:
I haven't heard anyone mention this yet, and it's a biggie, so I
guess I'd better de-lurk and explain it. The issue is this: There is
a legal distinction between static and dynamic linking, or at least
some licenses (the GPL is the one I'm
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:00 +1300, Vivian McPhail wrote:
It seems then that a package should be the least restrictive
combination of all the licenses in all the contained modules.
Omit the words least restrictive and I think you are correct.
To combine licences, just aggregate them.
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 12:44 +0100, Stefan Kersten wrote:
On 10.02.11 12:12, Duncan Coutts wrote:
We are already working on a feature that will show the full set of
licenses that the end user must comply with (a patch has been submitted
and it's been through one round of review so far
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:42 +, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
It seems then that a package should be the least restrictive
combination of all the licenses in all the contained modules.
Omit the words least restrictive and I think you are correct.
To combine licences, just aggregate them.
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 01:33 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
As you will be aware, some of the *.haskell.org websites have been down
recently, specifically:
code.haskell.org
trac.haskell.org
projects.haskell.org
planet.haskell.org
community.haskell.org
[...]
We have not yet re-enabled user
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 10:37 +0200, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
* Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com [2011-02-02 01:33:22+]
These are all hosted on the community server. The community server was
hacked on the 26th January and we took it offline. The server was
running an old version
All,
As you will be aware, some of the *.haskell.org websites have been down
recently, specifically:
code.haskell.org
trac.haskell.org
projects.haskell.org
planet.haskell.org
community.haskell.org
These are all hosted on the community server. The community server was
hacked on the 26th January
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 01:13 -0500, Ryan Newton wrote:
Ok, I've made some progress in the direction Duncan suggested.
I can filter out the extra library before the postConf hook gets it.
And calling make from the hooks is pretty easy.
I've got a hack working that does allow full
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 05:20 -0500, Ryan Newton wrote:
I am trying to link a .a file built by a separate makefile into my
library. GHC has no problem with it, but I need to convince cabal to
do it for the package to be hackage-friendly. There's a thread about
this back in 2007:
On 2 January 2011 13:35, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all
Can a lazy cons be implemented for (infinite) Streams in the
Stream-Fusion style?
In the standard stream fusion style, all stream operations are strict
in the stream itself (that is, the pair of stepper function
On 19 December 2010 17:44, Greg Weber g...@gregweber.info wrote:
Michael Snoyman and I were discussing the need for beta releases of Yesod
and he encourage me to post this to the cafe. Beta releases could be built
into the hackage system. However, this can be viewed as a more general
problem
On 16 December 2010 13:38, Daniel Fischer
daniel.is.fisc...@googlemail.com wrote:
The problem is that without upper bounds, things will break a lot when
packages undergo API changes, but probably more often things will also work
with the new API. So with upper bounds, you prevent breakage at
On 1 December 2010 03:54, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Thomas Schilling
nomin...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think a nicer way to solve that issue is to use Cabal's MIN_VERSION macros.
1. Add CPP to your extensions. This will cause cabal to
On 12 December 2010 20:55, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
So the net effect will be a migration from haskell.org to
haskell.cs.yale.edu, and not to community.haskell.org. I think that's
pretty odd, but people will have their reasons for doing it this way.
I addition to what Thomas
On 9 December 2010 21:04, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
On 10/12/2010, at 12:18 AM, Markus Läll wrote:
My take on the issue is that we should make it possible to easily mirror
hackage (what the OP asked for), so that people could use it when they
wanted to, and have a list of
On 8 December 2010 17:02, Sönke Hahn sh...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Hi!
If you write a cabal setup script with user hooks, is there a way to tell
cabal-install that the setup script itself depends on some package from
hackage? (The dependency would be cabal-macosx in my case.)
No, the Cabal
On 4 December 2010 16:31, Dan Knapp dan...@gmail.com wrote:
With Hackage down, now seemed like a good time to push this issue
again. It's such an important site to us that it's really rather a
shame there are no mirrors of it. I have a personal-and-business
server in a data center in Newark,
On 6 December 2010 11:02, Jacek Generowicz jacek.generow...@cern.ch wrote:
It a appears that a program which does not exist on my computer seems to
insist on a package version which does not exist in my universe, I'm
starting to wonder whether I have lost my marbles. Could some kind soul
On 6 December 2010 14:48, Jacek Generowicz jacek.generow...@cern.ch wrote:
Another thing that would probably have made it easier to understand: the
message is strictly correct, but is *too* specific: it talks about
pkg-config version =0.9.0 not being found, while the problem was that *no
On 11 November 2010 11:23, Nils Schweinsberg m...@n-sch.de wrote:
Configuring pcre-light-0.4...
cabal: Missing dependency on a foreign library:
* Missing C library: pcre
On 11 November 2010 12:41, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have the headers installed as
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 10:37 +0200, Niklas Broberg wrote:
I think the right solution is for the happy source file to specify
what kind of grammar it is / should be produced. Yes, that would mean
modifying happy.
Hmm, I agree with you in this particular case, regarding the grammar,
since
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 16:44 +0100, Thomas Schilling wrote:
I'm CC'ing Duncan, in case he has a better idea.
On 13 October 2010 19:44, Niklas Broberg niklas.brob...@gmail.com wrote:
What I want specifically is to have happy produce a GLR parser from my
.ly file, and I want this to happen
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 17:45 +, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Hi. I wonder how to do the following properly.
I have one (large) C type, let's call it T,
and I want to sell it as an abstract type in Haskell.
I want to use C functions as if they were of type T - T
(pure function, returns a
On 17 September 2010 04:44, Peter Schmitz ps.hask...@gmail.com wrote:
This gets a little hilarious (but better to laugh than cry).
Well, I decided to try Parsec version 3 (i.e., 3.1.0) after all
[...]
I did cabal upgrade parsec, which went great.
[...]
(This is where I began laughing
On 13 September 2010 20:54, Paolo Giarrusso p.giarru...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 20:46, Tillmann Rendel
ren...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote:
Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
in a tracker entry you linked to,
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/704, duncan argues that
we
On 9 September 2010 14:56, Tony Hannan tonyhann...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anywhere we can see the number of download for a particular
package, especially ones you maintain yourself?
And the new hackage server implementation maintains download counts.
See the server test instance here:
On 19 August 2010 21:15, Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
Daniel Fischer wrote:
Yes, when cabal runs haddock on a package, it generates a comprehensive
index if none is present or expands it with the new docs.
Quite cool that :)
It's something I've always _wanted_ Cabal to
On 20 August 2010 10:18, Christopher Done chrisd...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does Cabal have a way to produce binary distributions from a package?
No but it's not too hard to do.
If you actually want an RPM or a DEB etc, then look into the cabal2rpm
etc tools, they help automate the process.
If
On 20 August 2010 14:20, Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote:
Here's another instance of the machine (*) telling me what to do,
instead of doing it (or am I missing something):
I have a large set of cabal packages installed with ghc.
Then suddenly I need some package Foo with
On 13 August 2010 15:49, Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote:
How is the cabal magic that would run hscolour?
I am using cabal haddock --executables --hyperlink-source
and this generates the API docs for all modules,
and all have source links, but the actual html-ized
On 18 August 2010 10:05, Oleg Lobachev
lobac...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote:
Hello all,
the and function, and :: [Bool] - Bool is defined in two different ways in
the latest Prelude.
I would expect it to be
and = foldr () True
However, there is a further recursive definition, and it
On 18 August 2010 13:29, Oleg Lobachev
lobac...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote:
By the way, does some good reading on streams in Haskell exist? I am
interested primarily in a theoretical foundation, which should however be
somehow related to Haskell. My guess would be the relation of
On 18 August 2010 12:55, Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote:
Duncan Coutts duncan.coutts at googlemail.com writes:
Your .cabal file probably does not list the other-modules as it
should, so Cabal does not know that the other modules exist.
Ah.
Strange though that it seems
On 18 August 2010 15:04, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com wrote:
For me, the whole point of this discussion was to
determine whether we should attempt porting to UTF-8, which as I understand
it would be a rather large undertaking.
And the answer to that is, yes but only if we have good
On 18 August 2010 15:13, Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote:
Duncan Coutts duncan.coutts at googlemail.com writes:
Your .cabal file probably does not list the other-modules ...
Enforcing it properly is on the TODO list.
Please don't ... there's the design principle
On 18 August 2010 18:13, Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
Then again, all the links were broken anyway. They all had paths like
C:\Program Files\Haskell\...whatever, and Mozilla apparently expects them
to say file://C:/Program Files/Haskell/...whatever. It kept whining that
On 29 July 2010 07:53, Conrad Parker con...@metadecks.org wrote:
Something smells fishy here. I have a hard time believing that binary is
reading more input than is available? Could you post more code please?
The issue seems to just be the return value for bytes consumed from
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:01 +0900, Conrad Parker wrote:
On 29 July 2010 17:46, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 29 July 2010 07:53, Conrad Parker con...@metadecks.org wrote:
Something smells fishy here. I have a hard time believing that binary is
reading more input
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:17 +0900, Conrad Parker wrote:
On 29 July 2010 19:13, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:01 +0900, Conrad Parker wrote:
On 29 July 2010 17:46, Duncan Coutts duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 29 July 2010 07:53, Conrad
On 28 July 2010 23:46, Peter Schmitz ps.hask...@gmail.com wrote:
I will try experimenting with editing the config file and using that hidden
option you mentioned.
** Cabal experts:
If anyone knows how to do this sort of thing in a better way, I would
appreciate a word.
Rogan is right. You
On 2 July 2010 11:56, JP Moresmau jpmores...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Duncan Coutts dun...@well-typed.com
wrote:
When we are done we intend to write up a blog post more details, e.g.
numbers and the range/distribution of experience among candidates. I
hope
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:43 -0400, Edward Kmett wrote:
* How many applications did you get?
I tend to actively recruit rather than throw open the floodgates.
We did that initially. We are now very pleased that we switched track to
openly advertising. We've had many excellent people
because we picked a
shortlist before doing interviewing. In general we have been very
impressed with both the number and quality of candidates. As Felipe
says, not restricting to applicants in the same country helps.
--
Duncan Coutts, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com
On 24 June 2010 13:10, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/06/2010 06:23, braver wrote:
I'll work with Simon to investigate the runtime, but would welcome any
ideas on further speeding up cafe4.
An update on this: with the help of Alex I tracked down the problem (an
integer
On 23 June 2010 19:57, Gregory Crosswhite gcr...@phys.washington.edu wrote:
cabal is the only mechanism that the vast majority of Haskell-users know how
to use these days. Resolving diamond dependencies safely relies on knowing
tha tthe use of different libraries is entirely internal to the
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 21:05 -0400, Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
On 6/23/10 8:06 PM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Consider an example where we want to avoid using two versions of a
dependency:
The htar program depends on the tar and zlib packages. The tar and
zlib packages depend on bytestring
On 18 June 2010 15:48, Daniel Kahlenberg d.kahlenb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently installed HP 2010.1.0.0 within Windows 7 and wanted to
upgrade the Cabal package to 1.8.0.6 today, sadly I got stuck on a
failure building the directory package.
So I tried to isolate the messages
On 5 June 2010 09:28, Bernie Pope florbit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to set a GHC compile option on a specific module
(not every module in the program) but only for a specific version of
GHC. Ideally within the confines of cabal, and in a portable way.
GHC provides the
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 17:31 -0400, Anthony LODI wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to build some haskell code as a .so/.dll so that it can
ultimately be used by msvc. I have it working when I compile by hand
(listed below) but I can't get the exact same thing built/linked with
cabal. On linux
On 17 May 2010 09:37, Phyx loneti...@gmail.com wrote:
The other approach I like much better is instead of doing global installs,
do user installs. In fact, I made it my default. Which solves any permission
error, but means every user on that machine has to install the libs
separately which
for the job. We are more than happy to answer informal enquiries.
Contact Duncan Coutts or Ian Lynagh for further information, either by
email or IRC.
The deadline for applications is Friday 11 June 2010.
--
Duncan Coutts, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com
On 28 April 2010 09:24, Richard G. richa...@richardg.name wrote:
I think that formatted plain-text output would be much better than XML,
something that is human-readable and relatively easy to parse via machine.
Something similar to the GHC error output would work well because
developers are
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 09:55 -0700, Rogan Creswick wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, it means the testing agent (cabal-install or some other
program/system) can do more than simply run all the tests. It means it
can enumerate
All,
c2hs version 0.16.2 is out and is available from hackage
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/c2hs
The only significant change in this release is that it works with
ghc-6.12.
Note that it is not currently possible to bind to C functions that use
long double as the corresponding Haskell type
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 18:43 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
* Build reporting in the hackage server
The idea here is that cabal sends back anonymous reports to the
server to say if a package compiled or not, and against what
versions of dependencies. This would
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 14:28 -0700, Jason Dagit wrote:
I've noticed another type of diamond dependency problem. Suppose I
build and install Foo today and it depends on Bar 2.0.0. In a week, I
install Bar 2.0.1. Next I installed Baz that also depends on Bar, and
it gets Bar 2.0.1. When I
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:21 +0100, Maciej Podgurski wrote:
Hi,
after updating to cabal-install-0.8.0/Cabal-1.8.0.2 with GHC 6.10.4, I
always get an error when updating the package list:
cabal update
Downloading the latest package list from hackage.haskell.org
cabal:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 22:10 -0400, Diego Echeverri wrote:
Hi!
I finish writing my proposal (maybe a bit too late).
I would be glad to read any feedback.
Hi Diego,
Generally a good proposal. It would be great for Cabal's Simple build
system to be able deal with pre-processor chaining and
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:33 +, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Miguel Mitrofanov wrote:
See http://www.haskell.org/cabal/ for more information.
^
|
+
Oh, sure, like I haven't already tried *that*. ;-)
BTW, for future reference, the
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 13:33 +, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
While I love Haskell it's packaging system have some problems -
especially with parsec.
Currently I'm not able to install an practically anything using cabal
due to version mismatches (or at least packages linking to both version
of
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 17:50 +0100, david fries wrote:
Dear Caféistas
I desperately need your collective knowledge I have been working on
porting the haskell-platform to the FreeBSD operating system for a while
now and some versioning issues have come up.
FreeBSD is still running on
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:07 -0500, Chris Casinghino wrote:
This works great, thanks!
As a footnote: I doubt I will be the only one is confused because
cc-options get passed to c2hs but cpp-options don't. Perhaps the
cabal designers should revisit this choice.
I mostly agree.
What is a bit
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 00:34 +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
Matthias Reisner schrieb:
Thanks, I missed that the flags are set dynamically if a dependency
cannot be satisfied.
Only cabal-install does this, plain Cabal only takes flags that were set
by the user.
No, plain Cabal does it
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 13:15 -0400, Leon Smith wrote:
As somebody who's hacked on cabal-install a bit (but don't have a
worthwhile patch to contribute (yet?)), I can tell you that versions
support a tag structure, at least internally, but I haven't seen a
non-empty tags field and don't know
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 14:52 +0100, Paul Brauner wrote:
Hi,
i'm working on a project made of
- lots of modules
- one excutable importing these modules
- another excutable importing these same modules
I don't especially want to expose those modules as libraries, especially
on
1 - 100 of 1242 matches
Mail list logo
