Re: [Haskell-cafe] Apache license, any drawbacks for Haskell packages?

2011-05-09 Thread Jason Dagit
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:

 Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
 packages?


I don't think so.  It looks to be almost identical to using BSD3, which is
already quite popular for haskellers.

This seems like a good write up of the apache license:
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/apache2.xml

Jason
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Apache license, any drawbacks for Haskell packages?

2011-05-09 Thread Max Rabkin
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:59, Jason Dagit dag...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:

 Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
 packages?

 I don't think so.  It looks to be almost identical to using BSD3, which is
 already quite popular for haskellers.

I would consider this, in itself, to be a small but significant
disadvantage. Anyone who uses Haskell is going to know (and probably
be comfortable with) the BSD3 license. If I find Apache-licensed code,
I now have to look that up, determine the differences between it and
BSD3, find out whether it's compatible with the GPL and BSD3.

Basically, the cost of introducing *any* new license to a software
ecosystem is non-zero. Of course, a widespread license like Apache is
better than making up your own.

--Max

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Apache license, any drawbacks for Haskell packages?

2011-05-09 Thread Roman Cheplyaka
* Jason Dagit dag...@gmail.com [2011-05-09 01:59:46-0700]
 On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
 
  Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
  packages?
 
 
 I don't think so.  It looks to be almost identical to using BSD3, which is
 already quite popular for haskellers.
 
 This seems like a good write up of the apache license:
 http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/apache2.xml
 
 Jason

Here is a more detailed analysis:
http://www.ifosslr.org/ifosslr/article/view/42


-- 
Roman I. Cheplyaka :: http://ro-che.info/
Don't worry what people think, they don't do it very often.

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Apache license, any drawbacks for Haskell packages?

2011-05-09 Thread Magnus Therning
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:10, Max Rabkin max.rab...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:59, Jason Dagit dag...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:

 Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
 packages?

 I don't think so.  It looks to be almost identical to using BSD3, which is
 already quite popular for haskellers.

 I would consider this, in itself, to be a small but significant
 disadvantage. Anyone who uses Haskell is going to know (and probably
 be comfortable with) the BSD3 license. If I find Apache-licensed code,
 I now have to look that up, determine the differences between it and
 BSD3, find out whether it's compatible with the GPL and BSD3.

 Basically, the cost of introducing *any* new license to a software
 ecosystem is non-zero. Of course, a widespread license like Apache is
 better than making up your own.

Yes, I agree with that, both points.  The code is for a tool (not a
library).  In the past I'd just release it under GPL, but I thought
I'd take a closer look at the Apache license, based on a discussion I
had a few weeks ago.

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: mag...@therning.org   jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] Apache license, any drawbacks for Haskell packages?

2011-05-08 Thread Magnus Therning
Are there any drawbacks to using the Apache license for Haskell
packages?

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning  OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 
email: mag...@therning.org   jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe   http://therning.org/magnus

I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have
C++ in mind.
 -- Alan Kay


pgppagK1tdpb8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe