Isaac,
Does anyone know if it is possible to specify a default definition
for an
associated type synonym?
According to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/TypeFunctionsStatus
defaults for associated types is still a TODO.
Cheers,
Stefan
Dreixel wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know if it is possible to specify a default definition for an
associated type synonym? When I tried:
class A a where
type B a = a
GHC (version 6.9.20080309) told me: Type declaration in a class must be a
kind signature or synonym default. However, when I
Hello,
Does anyone know if it is possible to specify a default definition for an
associated type synonym? When I tried:
class A a where
type B a = a
GHC (version 6.9.20080309) told me: Type declaration in a class must be a
kind signature or synonym default. However, when I look at the
