On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 15:56 -0200, Maurício wrote:
Hi,
Is there a Haskellforge somewhere, i.e.,
something like a sourceforge for open source
Haskell programs, with darcs, automatic
cabalization etc.? Has anyone tried that
already?
There
briqueabraque:
Hi,
Is there a Haskellforge somewhere, i.e.,
something like a sourceforge for open source
Haskell programs, with darcs, automatic
cabalization etc.? Has anyone tried that
already?
We use
http://community.haskell.org/
which you can ask for an account on.
with darcs
duncan.coutts:
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 15:56 -0200, Maurício wrote:
Hi,
Is there a Haskellforge somewhere, i.e.,
something like a sourceforge for open source
Haskell programs, with darcs, automatic
cabalization etc.? Has anyone tried that
already?
There is the Haskell Community
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 15:56 -0200, Maurício wrote:
Hi,
Is there a Haskellforge somewhere, i.e.,
something like a sourceforge for open source
Haskell programs, with darcs, automatic
cabalization etc.? Has anyone tried that
already?
There is the Haskell Community server
Hi,
Is there a Haskellforge somewhere, i.e.,
something like a sourceforge for open source
Haskell programs, with darcs, automatic
cabalization etc.? Has anyone tried that
already?
Maurício
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
I think people want something like CPAN. This implies a centralized
official repository, somewhere that isn't going to go away, ever, because
too many people would scream. It should probably be mirrored, too, like with
cpan.
Maybe darcs.haskell.org is ok for this roll already. Not sure. (Still a
tphyahoo wrote:
I think people want something like CPAN. This implies a centralized
official repository
I agree.
I think we also need a notion of a canonical
standard package for each popular category.
True, it is sometimes nice to have a lot of alternatives to choose
from. And to be able to
Yitzchak Gale wrote:
tphyahoo wrote:
I think people want something like CPAN. This implies a centralized
official repository
I agree.
I think we also need a notion of a canonical
standard package for each popular category.
For some categories, it might be better to have a canonial
Let's be really specific about what we want to have in this regard:
1. repo hosting
2. repo searching
3. A shared/federated name space mapping module names to the URLs of
repos that implement those modules
4. A dev system that uses the name space to download and import chase
the modules
Hi
I.e. cabal + hackage + planet.haskell + weekly news ;)
Does hackage actually allow a user to setup a new darcs repo on a
remote server? That's about the only thing lacking - for everything
else people can just use code.google.com, which is way better than
anything any Haskell hacker would
On 1/7/07, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://rubyforge.org/ , for one. But I'd argue it's not really
Hackage, so much as a pretty wrapper for darcs.haskell.org. (Gems is
the Ruby equivalent of Cabal and Hackage.)
I've been programming in Ruby for about 1.5 years, and
Am Montag, 8. Januar 2007 17:15 schrieb Justin Bailey:
[...]
For example, if I want to install Rails (ruby web-app framework), I just
type:
gem install rails
It's pretty slick.
How does this work with the native packaging mechanism on your platform
(RPM, ...)? Does it work behind it's
On 1/8/07, Sven Panne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Montag, 8. Januar 2007 17:15 schrieb Justin Bailey:
[...]
For example, if I want to install Rails (ruby web-app framework), I just
type:
gem install rails
It's pretty slick.
How does this work with the native packaging mechanism on your
On Mon, 2007-08-01 at 18:19 +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
For example, if I want to install Rails (ruby web-app framework), I just
type:
gem install rails
It's pretty slick.
How does this work with the native packaging mechanism on your platform
(RPM, ...)? Does it work behind it's
is it a good idea to have HaskellForge?
Ruby, Lua and some other languages have already
adopted GForge, and I must say, those sites look
*impressive*!!!
any Ruby programmer on the list? can anyone provide an
estimate of the amount of work involved?
cheers, and long live the lambda revolution.
uchchwhash:
is it a good idea to have HaskellForge?
Ruby, Lua and some other languages have already
adopted GForge, and I must say, those sites look
*impressive*!!!
Got some URLs for these?
any Ruby programmer on the list? can anyone provide an
estimate of the amount of work involved?
On Jan 7, 2007, at 23:17 , Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
uchchwhash:
is it a good idea to have HaskellForge?
Ruby, Lua and some other languages have already
adopted GForge, and I must say, those sites look
*impressive*!!!
Got some URLs for these?
http://rubyforge.org/ , for one. But I'd
allbery:
On Jan 7, 2007, at 23:17 , Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
uchchwhash:
is it a good idea to have HaskellForge?
Ruby, Lua and some other languages have already
adopted GForge, and I must say, those sites look
*impressive*!!!
Got some URLs for these?
http://rubyforge.org/ ,
18 matches
Mail list logo
