Yes I have. I actually bought the few only F# books available. It's a
nice language, and an incredible amount of work. The Visual Studio
plugin also works well.
But somehow I found Haskell cleaner... Its laziness is a better for me ;-)
But I might switch back to F# someday, and then learning
On 10/3/07, Peter Verswyvelen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I needed to type at least 3 times the amount of code, much
of which was boilerplate code, and the code is not elegant.
Reflection is your friend here.
Example. Code before reflection:
MyConfig
{
// some properties here
public
Thanks for the C# advise, but I was actually just comparing my C# code
with similar Haskell code. Yes, I also like aspect oriented programming,
dynamic code generation, and LINQ to avoid boilerplate code in C#, but
this is a Haskell group, and I want to be curried ;-)
But, for my students I'm
Have you tried F#? I mean, I havent ;-) but maybe it's an interesting
half-way house? Presumably you can use all the standard .Net
libraries (maybe good enough for getting asp.net working etc?), and
you can still use FP constructs?
I understand F# is not pure (I think?), and doesnt have monads,
On 10/10/07, Peter Verswyvelen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A noble goal and I wish you luck. I'd love to see if you get .NET working
with Haskell - I have tried to figure it out from that old build of Hugs and
never had any luck. Tantalizingly, the GHC source has some Dotnet stuff in
it but it
Hi Peter,
There is a Dotnet tree in the Hugs source code files, which I believe
is what supports dotnet. As far as I am aware, it probably won't work.
A windows developer may be able to build it, but I've never tried.
You might also be interested to know that Yhc supports --dotnet to
generate a
In the (Win)Hugs documentation, I found
Only the ccall, stdcall and *dotnet *calling conventions are supported.
All others are flagged as errors.
However, I fail to find any more information on how to invoke dotnet
methods. This might be really handy for me, as I'm very familiar with
the
