[Haskell-cafe] Paid work available in functional web programming

2011-07-13 Thread Adam Chlipala
First, I apologize in advance if this post is deemed off-topic. It's about Ur/Web, a statically typed, pure functional programming languages that is much influenced by Haskell. For instance, Ur/Web includes monadic IO and type classes. I write to mention briefly that I'm looking for people

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Paid work available in functional web programming

2011-07-13 Thread Christopher Done
On 13 July 2011 15:28, Adam Chlipala ad...@impredicative.com wrote: I write to mention briefly that I'm looking for people interested in writing Ur/Web programs for pay.  Ur/Web is a DSL for building modern web applications, and I believe it is truly a secret weapon for that domain, and one

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Paid work available in functional web programming

2011-07-13 Thread Yves Parès
It'd also be interesting to know what you missed in Haskell web development so that you needed to build a new language inspired from it. 2011/7/13 Christopher Done chrisd...@googlemail.com On 13 July 2011 15:28, Adam Chlipala ad...@impredicative.com wrote: I write to mention briefly that I'm

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Paid work available in functional web programming

2011-07-13 Thread Daniel Patterson
I also think it would be really good to have some documentation that explains the type system and how to do neat things with it in terms that a reasonably competent haskell / ML programmer could understand. I played around with Ur/Web about a year ago and was able to make a simple

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Paid work available in functional web programming

2011-07-13 Thread Ertugrul Soeylemez
Christopher Done chrisd...@googlemail.com wrote: I write to mention briefly that I'm looking for people interested in writing Ur/Web programs for pay.  Ur/Web is a DSL for building modern web applications, and I believe it is truly a secret weapon for that domain, and one that should

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Paid work available in functional web programming

2011-07-13 Thread Adam Chlipala
Christopher Done wrote: I also find it hard to understand the type system in a non-superficial level because the related paper was very hard to grok. I'll only claim it's a fairly breezy read for people familiar with dependent type theory, which admittedly is not a huge crowd, even as a