Ketil Malde wrote:
Neil Mitchell wrote:
DBM's can differentiate themselves on external database support,
Surely this is an opportunity to focus development on a single library
with broader support? Currently, we have HSQL and HDBC supplying
incompatible low-level interfaces, supporting a
Adrian Hey wrote:
Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi
They are less stable and have less quality control.
Surely you jest? I see no evidence of this, rather the contrary in fact.
No, dead serious. The libraries have a library submission process.
It does not follow that libraries that have not been
On 18-sep-2007, at 14:10, Simon Marlow wrote:
Adrian Hey wrote:
Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi
They are less stable and have less quality control.
Surely you jest? I see no evidence of this, rather the contrary
in fact.
No, dead serious. The libraries have a library submission process.
It
Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Adrian Hey wrote:
Ideally the way to deal with this is via standardised interfaces (using
type classes with Haskell), not standardised implementations. Even this
level of standardisation is not a trivial clear cut design exercise.
e.g we
Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Adrian Hey wrote:
Ideally the way to deal with this is via standardised interfaces (using
type classes with Haskell), not standardised implementations. Even this
level of standardisation is not a trivial clear cut design exercise.
e.g we currently
