[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-20 Thread Achim Schneider
Kemps-Benedix Torsten torsten.kemps-bene...@sks-ub.de wrote: Hello, but to specify that ___this function turns a list into its sorted equivalent___ would probably require to specify e.g. sort in terms of the type system and to write code that actually does the sorting. The first task is

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-13 Thread Daniel Kraft
Hi, Henning Thielemann wrote: Daniel Kraft wrote: I noticed last year Haskell.org was a mentoring organization for Google's Summer of Code, and I barely noticed some discussion about it applying again this year :) I participated for GCC in 2008 and would like to try again this year; while

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-13 Thread Henning Thielemann
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Daniel Kraft wrote: Henning Thielemann wrote: DoCon? hm, I've only read a little on their webpage; what I was thinking of was to implement a very basic package just to do some symbolic integration or equation solving to be embedded in some other calculation, and

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-12 Thread Achim Schneider
Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote: Am Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009 18:51 schrieb Don Stewart: For example, if all the haddocks on hackage.org were a wiki, and interlinked, every single package author would benefit, as would all users. You mean, everyone should be able to

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-12 Thread Heinrich Apfelmus
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Don Stewart wrote: For example, if all the haddocks on hackage.org were a wiki, and interlinked, every single package author would benefit, as would all users. You mean, everyone should be able to mess about with my documentation? This would be similar to give

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-12 Thread Luke Palmer
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Heinrich Apfelmus apfel...@quantentunnel.de wrote: Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote: Don Stewart wrote: For example, if all the haddocks on hackage.org were a wiki, and interlinked, every single package author would benefit, as would all users. You mean,

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-12 Thread Heinrich Apfelmus
Don Stewart wrote: No one said anything about unrestricted commit rights ... we're not crazy ... what if it were more like, say, RWH's wiki .. where comments go to editors to encorporate ... By the way, the PHP documentation has such a comment feature, see for example

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-12 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 09:20 schrieb Achim Schneider: Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote: Am Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009 18:51 schrieb Don Stewart: For example, if all the haddocks on hackage.org were a wiki, and interlinked, every single package author would

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-12 Thread Achim Schneider
Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote: Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 09:20 schrieb Achim Schneider: Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote: Am Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009 18:51 schrieb Don Stewart: For example, if all the haddocks on hackage.org were a wiki, and

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell.org GSoC

2009-02-12 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 10:49 schrieb Luke Palmer: Something like AnnoCPAN would be a good middle-ground here; i.e. differentiate between official package documentation and user annotations, but make them both visible. And give visitors of the Hackage website the choice to not see the