[Haskell-cafe] Re: Paper draft: Denotational design with type class morphisms

2009-02-20 Thread Achim Schneider
Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote: DRAFT version ___ comments please Conal, please, PLEASE, never, EVER again use the word meaning if you actually mean denotation. It confuses the hell out of me, especially the (I guess unintended) connotation that you analyse the meaning of a particular

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Paper draft: Denotational design with type class morphisms

2009-02-20 Thread Robin Green
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:17:14 +0100 Achim Schneider bars...@web.de wrote: Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote: DRAFT version ___ comments please Conal, please, PLEASE, never, EVER again use the word meaning if you actually mean denotation. It confuses the hell out of me, especially the

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Paper draft: Denotational design with type class morphisms

2009-02-20 Thread Tristan Seligmann
* Achim Schneider bars...@web.de [2009-02-20 15:17:14 +0100]: Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote: DRAFT version ___ comments please Conal, please, PLEASE, never, EVER again use the word meaning if you actually mean denotation. It confuses the hell out of me, especially the (I guess

[Haskell-cafe] Re: Paper draft: Denotational design with type class morphisms

2009-02-20 Thread Achim Schneider
Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:17:14 +0100 Achim Schneider bars...@web.de wrote: Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote: DRAFT version ___ comments please Conal, please, PLEASE, never, EVER again use the word meaning if you actually mean denotation.

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Paper draft: Denotational design with type class morphisms

2009-02-20 Thread Gregg Reynolds
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Achim Schneider bars...@web.de wrote: Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:17:14 +0100 Achim Schneider bars...@web.de wrote: Conal Elliott co...@conal.net wrote: DRAFT version ___ comments please Conal, please,