Don Stewart wrote:
http://cs.hubfs.net/blogs/hell_is_other_languages/archive/2008/01/16/4565.aspx
I imagine this can only ease the process of learning Haskell, and
broaden the base of possible Haskellers, as more people on using .NET
stuff become familiar with modern typed FP.
There's a
On 18 Jan 2008, at 09:01, apfelmus wrote:
Don Stewart wrote:
http://cs.hubfs.net/blogs/hell_is_other_languages/archive/2008/01/16/4565.aspx
I imagine this can only ease the process of learning Haskell, and
broaden the base of possible Haskellers, as more people on using .NET
stuff become
apfelmus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I imagine this can only ease the process of learning Haskell, and
broaden the base of possible Haskellers, as more people on using .NET
stuff become familiar with modern typed FP.
There's a reason the STM monad hatched in Haskell: how does the above
STM in
On Jan 18, 2008 4:59 AM, Ketil Malde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apfelmus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I imagine this can only ease the process of learning Haskell, and
broaden the base of possible Haskellers, as more people on using .NET
stuff become familiar with modern typed FP.
There's a
B-but, (and here's the ironic part), launchMissile is only idempotent it the
missile is atomic.
--S
2008/1/18 Brent Yorgey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 18, 2008 4:59 AM, Ketil Malde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apfelmus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I imagine this can only ease the process of
