On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 23:11 -0500, Galchin, Vasili wrote:
at this point rebuild and install the unix package ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/FTP/Haskell/bytestring-mmap-0.2.0$ runhaskell
Setup.lhs clean
cleaning...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/FTP/Haskell/bytestring-mmap-0.2.0$ runhaskell
Setup.lhs
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 00:04 -0500, Galchin, Vasili wrote:
Duncan,
By installing localling, I runhaskell Setup.hs configure
--prefix=$HOME plus add local path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH and
LD_RUN_PATH? On Linux, does ghc use .so's or is it linked statically?
ghc is linked statically but when
Something like that yes.
You're running runhaskell Setup.lhs and that loads and runs code from
the Cabal library. The Cabal library depends on the process library
which depends on the unix library. So by replacing the same version of
the unix package you're breaking everything else which
On 2008 Jun 3, at 16:40, Galchin, Vasili wrote:
1) How do I get the local package.conf built and populated?
2) How do I get a test case to link against this experimental
local version of unix? Is there a --prefix or something like
that I pass on runhaskell Setup.hs build?
both
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 00:07 -0500, Galchin, Vasili wrote:
Hello,
I have been developing new code for the unix package. I have
run into what I think are ghc 6.8.2 anomalies but couldn't see a
pattern. Possibly now I do. I have been using the 32-bit x86 ghc
binary that I downloaded
Hi Duncan,
Not sure I agree the behavior is ok. E.g. here is a build of mmap:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/FTP/Haskell/bytestring-mmap-0.2.0$ runhaskell Setup.lhs
clean
cleaning...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/FTP/Haskell/bytestring-mmap-0.2.0$ runhaskell Setup.lhs
configure
Configuring
Duncan,
By installing localling, I runhaskell Setup.hs configure
--prefix=$HOME plus add local path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH and LD_RUN_PATH? On
Linux, does ghc use .so's or is it linked statically?
Vasili
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon,
Hello,
I have been developing new code for the unix package. I have run
into what I think are ghc 6.8.2 anomalies but couldn't see a pattern.
Possibly now I do. I have been using the 32-bit x86 ghc binary that I
downloaded from http://www.haskell.org and running on Ubuntu Linux. I am
pretty