jwlato:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Alexander Dunlap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jwlato:
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
cases. With the following simple test:
import qualified
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40:48AM +0700, Donald Halomoan wrote:
Where can I get ghc-6.10? I cannot see it at haskell.org website.
No releases from the 6.10 branch have been made yet.
Thanks
Ian
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
jwlato:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jwlato:
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
cases. With the following simple test:
import
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Alexander Dunlap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
jwlato:
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
cases. With the following simple test:
import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as L
import Data.Binary
import Data.Binary.Get
Where can I get ghc-6.10? I cannot see it at haskell.org website.
On 2008-10-29, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jwlato:
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
cases. With the
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
cases. With the following simple test:
import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as L
import Data.Binary
import Data.Binary.Get
import Control.Monad
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:36 AM, John Lato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I was experimenting with using ghc-6.10.0.20081007 on a project, and
it seems that binary-0.4.3.1 has markedly worse performance in certain
cases. With the following simple test:
import qualified
10 matches
Mail list logo
