To: Lihn, Steve
Cc: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH; Haskell-Cafe Haskell-Cafe; Stefan O'Rear
Subject: RE: [Haskell-cafe] How to thoroughly clean up Haskell stuff on
linux
Indeed, I don't want to waste time but have no choice (rpm needs root),
not sure if this'll help (never tried it myself
Indeed, I don't want to waste time but have no choice (rpm needs root),
not sure if this'll help (never tried it myself) but this claims there's a
non-root way to use rpm
http://www.techonthenet.com/linux/build_rpm.php
cheers, t.
---
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged
, October 12, 2007 11:04 PM
To: Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
Cc: Lihn, Steve; Haskell-Cafe Haskell-Cafe
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] How to thoroughly clean up Haskell stuff on
linux
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:31:45PM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
wrote:
I don't think haddock has to depend on lamdbabot
are you certain haddock depends on lambdabot? that seems very strange
to me.
Thomas,
I also thought haddock should be an easy build, but it just won't do it.
/home2/user/garden/haddock-0.8 runhaskell ./Setup.lhs install
Installing: --prefix=~/cabal/lib/haddock-0.8/ghc-6.4
not trying to start a flame war here, but I had pretty good success with
apt-get and ubuntu.
however, I admit I never really got lambdabot to work.
if you install from source you can have 6.6, 6.6.1 and 6.4 all installed
at the same time.
you just need to create simlinks for the old versions.
stuff from source :)
t.
Lihn, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/12/2007 05:38 PM
To
Thomas Hartman/ext/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
haskell-cafe@haskell.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
RE: [Haskell-cafe] How to thoroughly clean up Haskell stuff on linux
are you certain haddock depends on lambdabot
On Oct 12, 2007, at 17:38 , Lihn, Steve wrote:
Installing: --prefix=~/cabal/lib/haddock-0.8/ghc-6.4
This looks suspicious to me: the ~ metacharacter is only
understood by shells, and only in certain circumstances (i.e. only at
the beginning of a word, not after a =), and by the time
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:31:45PM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
I don't think haddock has to depend on lamdbabot. But I saw Skipping
HaddockHoogle during the build. Isn't the Hoogle thing related to
Lambdabot? Or they are unrelated.
Only insofar has Lambdabot has an interface to
