2013/9/22 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Bardur Arantsson s...@scientician.net
wrote:
Trying to make something whose name is Not A Number act like a
number sounds broken from the start.
The point here is that IEEE floats are actually more something like a
Maybe
the Frankfurt Haskell User Group announces its first Hackathon, if
interested, see here:
http://www.meetup.com/Frankfurt-Haskell-User-Group/events/138895112/
Peter Althainz
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Sven Panne svenpa...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/9/22 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Bardur Arantsson s...@scientician.net
wrote:
Trying to make something whose name is Not A Number act like a
number sounds broken from the start.
I suggest to add superclass' instances into libraries.
http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8348
In brief, we could write next:
{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
instance Monad m = Applicative m where
pure = return
(*) = ap
instance
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Stijn van Drongelen rhym...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Sven Panne svenpa...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/9/22 Mike Meyer m...@mired.org:
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Bardur Arantsson s...@scientician.net
wrote:
Trying to make
On 13-09-21 05:13 AM, Vlatko Basic wrote:
I'd like to extract A texts from row with header Caption, and have
come up with this
runX $ doc
(deep (hasName tr) --
filter only TRs
withTraceLevel 5 traceTree --
shows
Hi everyone,
Having been running the Hackage 2 alpha beta for several months we
intend to do the final switchover tomorrow (Wednesday 25th Sept).
This will involve disabling uploads to the old server for a few hours.
If all goes well we will switch the DNS over. If anything goes wrong
we will
This line
instance Monad m = Applicative m where
tells the compiler Every type (of the appropriate kind) is an instance of
Applicative. And it needs to have a Monad instance as well.
That's what Edward means when he said that it means every Applicative is a
Monad. Theoretically the
