Hi
So does the silence = approval rule apply here?
2 days is not enough time :-)
I disagree, its a breaking change from Haskell 98. It also means that
if you want to provide syntactic sugar for do notation, i.e. my Test
monad, you have to jump through more hoops.
Haskell' is about fixing existing practice, if it did go in, you
would need some mechanism (i.e. class aliases) to ensure that it
didn't break code.
... which is why we need class aliases!!
I want to see this change, *and* I want to see class aliases. :-)
I want class aliases,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 06:25:28PM -0700, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
I wrote:
Proposal:
Make Applicative (in Control.Applicative) a superclass of Monad (in
Control.Monad).
So does the silence = approval rule apply here?
I think that people believe this is generally a good idea, but until the
