Re: [HCP-Users] Location of CIFTI vertices in standard space

If they exist in freesurfer format, you can use mris_convert to make gifti versions. If you only have one anatomical group average surface from fsaverage, you can use the -nearest-vertex option in -label-to-volume-mapping. You could also use whatever freesurfer method you used previously to map

Re: [HCP-Users] Location of CIFTI vertices in standard space

This is something we've been working on, including making it easier to do by providing some additional files, but it isn't ready yet (we need to generate some of these files). If you want a quick version of the gifti label files on fsaverage, you can use -label-resample, and use BARYCENTRIC as

Re: [HCP-Users] 7T retinotopy task script

Hi Ely, We haven't distributed that code yet, but we probably should include that in the next 7T data release. The 7T tasks were written in matlab (psychtoolbox), not eprime, and it may take some work to get them into a distributable state. -Keith On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Ely,

[HCP-Users] 7T retinotopy task script

Hi HCP team, I'd like to download the retinotopy eprime scripts used for the 7T HCP release. I was previously able to download the 3T scripts, but I can't find where the 7T scripts are hosted. Could you please advise? Many thanks, -Ely ___ HCP-Users

Re: [HCP-Users] Location of CIFTI vertices in standard space

Thank you for a quick reply. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Glasser, Matthew wrote: > > It is possible to bring this parcellation into fsaverage surface space, > and I believe there are instructions on the HCP wiki for doing this. > I could not find those instructions (this

Re: [HCP-Users] Location of CIFTI vertices in standard space

Indeed an average volume space version of this parcellation is not recommended, but rather average surface space or individual subject volume. This is for reasons discussed briefly at the beginning and end of the paper, but there will be another article in the relatively near future that will

Re: [HCP-Users] Location of CIFTI vertices in standard space

I believe the current HCP average surfaces are derived from functional area alignment (MSMAll), not folding alignment, which of course means that the geometric features won't be as well aligned between subjects compared to folding-only alignment (freesurfer), leading to more smoothing of the

Re: [HCP-Users] Location of CIFTI vertices in standard space

Hi, It seems I have stumbled upon the same problem while trying to project the MPM 1.0 parcellation to the MNI152 volume. I used -gifti-separate to export GIFTI label and then -label-to-volume-mapping to create NIFTI files. The results can be seen here:

Re: [HCP-Users] How to remove Axial ,parasagittal plane in Image

Under the wb_view pull down menu, you will find Preferences. Once in the Preferences box, select the Volume tab. Here is where you can turn off the Volume Axes Crosshairs. > On Jul 21, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Dev vasu > wrote: > > Dear Sir /madam, > >

[HCP-Users] Scan order variable

Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to download the Scan Order, Session Day and Scan Time variables for all Q900 release subjects in one go by any chance please? I know I can find them in ConnectomeDB by clicking on the relevant subjects and scans, but I can’t find it in any of the

[HCP-Users] Congrats: Nature article covered by NY Times

Congrats to all! doi:10.1038/nature18933 A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex Matthew F. Glasser1, Timothy S. Coalson1*, Emma C. Robinson2,3*, Carl D. Hacker4*, John Harwell1, Essa Yacoub5, Kamil Ugurbil5, Jesper Andersson2, Christian F. Beckmann6,7, Mark Jenkinson2, Stephen M.