Re: [HCP-Users] Question about magnitude of node time series

2018-10-25 Thread Steve Smith
Hi - In the most recent PTN release, all node maps (melodic_IC.dtseries.nii) created with group-ICA are sign-flipped (if necessary) to have positive maximum voxel/greyordinate, and then rescaled so this peak is 1. The values of other voxels across the map will vary from node to node, and the

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about dense functional connectome

2018-10-25 Thread Harms, Michael
As an aside, if ‘ft_read_cifti’ is expanding all the data to type double (64 bit), then you are looking at needing > 66 GB to load a 91282x91282 dconn.nii in matlab. I assume that is what is happening based on your experience. If you want to see how far you can get in Matlab, I would at least

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about dense functional connectome

2018-10-25 Thread Reza Rajimehr
Thanks Michael! Your suggestion was quite useful. I successfully loaded the connectivity matrix into Matlab using ciftiopen and did the operation that I wanted (i.e. selecting part of the matrix). Reza On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 6:41 PM Harms, Michael wrote: > > > As an aside, if ‘ft_read_cifti’

Re: [HCP-Users] Fiber tracking starting from PTM volumetric labels

2018-10-25 Thread Nicola Toschi
Thank you Matt, but since I am running all of this outside of the workbench it would be easiest to start with old-style niftii volumetric labels. Which CIFTI data exactly are you referring to? Thanks! Nicola On 10/24/2018 5:27 AM, Glasser, Matthew wrote: > I would do something like that

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about dense functional connectome

2018-10-25 Thread Reza Rajimehr
Thanks Tim! I will consider your suggestions. Reza On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:51 PM Timothy Coalson wrote: > If you have their cifti indices then you can just make a new cifti dscalar > with only those grayordinates set to 1 (double check this in wb_view, > matlab uses 1-based indexing, and I

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about dense functional connectome

2018-10-25 Thread Timothy Coalson
If your swap space isn't on an SSD, then it will be extremely slow to do anything on it. Tim On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:19 PM, Glasser, Matthew wrote: > Use swap space. > > Matt. > > From: on behalf of Timothy > Coalson > Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 at 4:57 PM > To: Reza Rajimehr >

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about dense functional connectome

2018-10-25 Thread Glasser, Matthew
Yes that would be a better solution. I think the wb_command -cifti-restrict-dense-map might work. Matt. From: Reza Rajimehr mailto:rajim...@gmail.com>> Date: Thursday, October 25, 2018 at 3:16 AM To: Matt Glasser mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> Cc: Timothy Coalson mailto:tsc...@mst.edu>>,

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about magnitude of node time series

2018-10-25 Thread David Hofmann
sorry, I meant the differences in scaling across nodes within a subject. Thanks! Am Do., 25. Okt. 2018 um 10:27 Uhr schrieb Steve Smith : > Hi - do you mean differences in scaling across nodes, or within-node > differences across subjects? > Cheers. > > > On 25 Oct 2018, at 09:21, David Hofmann

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about dense functional connectome

2018-10-25 Thread Reza Rajimehr
We tried to open *.dconn.nii in Matlab using ft_read_cifti on an Ubuntu system with 48 GB RAM. It used 48 GB RAM and 18 GB (out of 60 GB) swap, then Matlab gave out of memory error! Will try to use a system with even higher RAM. Tim: We have a list of 913 grayordinate voxels (we have their voxel

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about magnitude of node time series

2018-10-25 Thread David Hofmann
Thanks for the reply Stephen, do you have an idea, how these different amplitudes arise? Do they just reflect the strength of the BOLD fluctuations within these regions/components or are they also influenced by other factors like noise or something? I'm trying to understand if such differences do

Re: [HCP-Users] Question about magnitude of node time series

2018-10-25 Thread Steve Smith
Hi - do you mean differences in scaling across nodes, or within-node differences across subjects? Cheers. > On 25 Oct 2018, at 09:21, David Hofmann wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Stephen, > > do you have an idea, how these different amplitudes arise? Do they just > reflect the strength of