[HCP-Users] Only 40 preprocessed diffusion data in Q2 and Q1 reproc?

2013-09-05 Thread Fang-Cheng Yeh
Hi,

Our team bought the Commectone in a box and found that there are
only 40 subjects with preprocessed diffusion data, whereas there are
128 subjects having unprocessed diffusion data. It seems that some
subjects do not have their diffusion data preprocessed. Any reason for
not doing the preprocessing on their diffusion data?

I checked out the Q2 documents and there seems no answer to this
discrepancy.

Best regards,
Frank
___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


[HCP-Users] Another corrupted diffusion MRI data set found (Subject #103515)

2015-10-30 Thread Fang-Cheng Yeh
Dear HCP experts,

  The preproc diffusion data in subject #103515 seems to contain
empty values in some DWI acquisitions. It seems that the preproc
failed in this subject? (The unproc data look okay)

  I tried to download and check the preproc data from the
connectome db website, but got an error "Server aborted session: No
such file". I am not sure whether this empty value problem happens
only in my data source (I got the data from connectome in a box).

  I am also curious about what QC procedure had been applied to
the HCP data? Last time I  found subject #173132 has corrupted
diffusion data. Is there any fix to the data set? This QC issue may
become problematic for the next 1200 subject release.

Best regards,
Frank
___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


Re: [HCP-Users] Another corrupted diffusion MRI data set found (Subject #103515)

2015-10-30 Thread Fang-Cheng Yeh
Hi Jennifer,

Thank you very much for the reply. Is there a list of the
problematic data that helps users avoid them? I am sorry that I did
not notice this thread.

Thanks,
Frank

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Jennifer Elam <el...@pcg.wustl.edu> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Thanks for the catch. We found the problem with 103515 several weeks ago and
> posted this message to HCP-Users:
>
>
>
> From: hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org
> [mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org] On Behalf Of Jennifer Elam
>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 4:19 PM
>
> To: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
>
> Subject: [HCP-Users] Preprocessed Diffusion Data for 103515 incomplete
>
>
>
> We have recently discovered that the preprocessed diffusion data for subject
> 103515, released in Q1 (June 2013) and available since then is
> incomplete/corrupted and should not be used. This is evidenced by the fact
> that the preprocessed diffusion package is <400MB, when it should be 1.22GB.
>
>
>
> It appears that the diffusion preprocessing for that subject skipped an
> important middle pipeline and that accounts for the missing data. Since
> 103515 is a Q1 Release subject, the preprocessed diffusion data for this
> subject has been incomplete since our first Q1 data release and affects all
> HCP distributions via ConnectomeDB, Connectome in a Box, and Amazon S3.
>
>
>
> We are reprocessing the subject and will rerelease the diffusion data for
> 103515 along with the upcoming 900 Subjects +MEG3 Release.  At that time,
> Connectome in a Box and Amazon S3 distributions will be updated with the fix
> as well.
>
> Sorry for any inconvenience this has caused. We have added a note about this
> subject on our Data Issues and Fixes wiki page
> (https://wiki.humanconnectome.org/x/EIDDAQ).
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Jenn
>
>
>
> For 173132, we posted to the list and put this entry in the Data Issues and
> Fixes wiki page (https://wiki.humanconnectome.org/x/EIDDAQ):
>
>
>
> ยท  Diffusion data for subject 173132 corrupted
> A problem with the early stages of the v3.1 (500 Subjects) preprocessing of
> diffusion data released for subject 173132 has been found. Diffusion data
> for this subject downloaded from June 6, 2014-October 31, 2014 (or
> distributed in Connectome in a Box drives dated 20140805 or earlier) should
> not be used.
>
> Completed fix: Diffusion data for subject 173132 has been completely
> reprocessed and the fixed version is available in ConnectomeDB as of
> 10/31/14.  These files will need to be replaced for 500 Subjects Connectome
> in a Box dated 20140805 or earlier. The reprocessed files are included in
> 500 Subjects Connectome in a Box versions dated 20141203 and later.
>
>
>
> For our QC process in HCP, we do have an extensive QC process, on the
> scan-level data especially, which is detailed in Marcus et al. 2013 and in
> the Post Session 1 section of the HCP Reference Manual Standard Operating
> Procedure Appendix 4.
>
>
>
> When we do find a problem, we work to fix it and update the database ASAP.
> If we are preparing for a data release, we typically roll the fix into the
> updated data in the release, as we will do with the preprocessed diffusion
> packages for 103515.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Jenn
>
>
>
>
>
> Jennifer Elam, Ph.D.
>
> Outreach Coordinator, Human Connectome Project
>
> Washington University School of Medicine
>
> Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Box 8108
>
> 660 South Euclid Avenue
>
> St. Louis, MO 63110
>
> 314-362-9387
>
> el...@pcg.wustl.edu
>
> www.humanconnectome.org
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
>
> Jennifer Elam, Ph.D.
>
> Outreach Coordinator, Human Connectome Project
>
> Washington University School of Medicine
>
> Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Box 8108
>
> 660 South Euclid Avenue
>
> St. Louis, MO 63110
>
> 314-362-9387
>
> el...@pcg.wustl.edu
>
> www.humanconnectome.org
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org
> [mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org] On Behalf Of Fang-Cheng Yeh
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 10:19 AM
> To: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
> Subject: [HCP-Users] Another corrupted diffusion MRI data set found (Subject
> #103515)
>
>
>
> Dear HCP experts,
>
>
>
>   The preproc diffusion data in subject #103515 seems to contain empty
> values in some DWI acquisitions. It seems that the preproc failed in this
> subject? (The unproc data look okay)
>
>
>
>   I tried to download and check the preproc 

[HCP-Users] Mass lesion in subject# 105620 at the posterior corpus callosum

2017-07-07 Thread Fang-Cheng Yeh
Hi,

 There is a mass lesion in subject# 105620 that may require a follow-up
to rule out a possible tumor.

Best regards,
Frank

[image: Inline image 1]

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
Spam detection software, running on the system "mailman02.nrg.mir", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.

Content preview:  Hi, There is a mass lesion in subject# 105620 that may require
   a follow-up to rule out a possible tumor. Best regards, Frank [...] 

Content analysis details:   (7.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name  description
 -- --
 3.1 BAD_ENC_HEADER Message has bad MIME encoding in the header
 2.2 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE   BODY: HTML included in message
 1.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 0-400 bytes of words




[HCP-Users] HCP dMRI quality control question

2017-08-04 Thread Fang-Cheng Yeh
Hi HCP Consortium,

   The dMRI protocol has 270 directions (excluding b0), but there
are several subjects with dMRI data less than 270 directions (shown by
the bval file). For example, subject 578158 only has 164 DWI (b0
excluded). Is this a known quality control issue?


Best regards,
Frank
___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users