Re: [HCP-Users] Subjects with less than 1200 time points

2017-10-12 Thread Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> Cc: Tong He <hetong1...@gmail.com<mailto:hetong1...@gmail.com>>, "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>&g

Re: [HCP-Users] Subjects with less than 1200 time points

2017-10-12 Thread Elam, Jennifer
;hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Reinder Vos de Wael <reinder.vosdew...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 2:41:20 PM To: Glasser, Matthew Cc: Tong He; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Subjects with less than 1200 time points Hi, Is

Re: [HCP-Users] Subjects with less than 1200 time points

2017-10-12 Thread Reinder Vos de Wael
me.org>> > Cc: Tong He <hetong1...@gmail.com <mailto:hetong1...@gmail.com>> > Subject: [HCP-Users] Subjects with less than 1200 time points > > Dear HCP experts, > > We found several subjects with less than 1200 time points. May we know why > this happens? Are

Re: [HCP-Users] Subjects with less than 1200 time points

2017-10-12 Thread Glasser, Matthew
ong1...@gmail.com<mailto:hetong1...@gmail.com>> Subject: [HCP-Users] Subjects with less than 1200 time points Dear HCP experts, We found several subjects with less than 1200 time points. May we know why this happens? Are these subjects problematic and should we exclude them or can they

[HCP-Users] Subjects with less than 1200 time points

2017-10-12 Thread Ruby Kong
Dear HCP experts, We found several subjects with less than 1200 time points. May we know why this happens? Are these subjects problematic and should we exclude them or can they be used? Here are the subjects with less than 1200 time points: 119732 rfMRI_REST2_LR 119732 rfMRI_REST2_RL 119833