You can do this on the surface for the cortex, you will probably want to
use -cifti-separate to get the left/right pieces as separate files, then
you can use -metric-math for difference/thresholding/masking/etc, and then
-metric-vertex-sum with an -integrate option to get an answer in terms of
surface area.  You might need to be careful near the medial wall, I don't
know that our left and right medial wall masks match in our grayordinate
space.  You can get these medial wall masks from -cifti-separate also, by
using the -roi options.

The subcortical gray matter and cerebellum voxels can be extracted by
-cifti-separate also, and you can deal with them in the way you are used
to.  I don't know that there is a good way to combine the surface and
volume results.

Tim


On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Aaron R <aaro...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear HCP users,
>
> I'd like to investigate lateralization of activation in task data in some
> subcortical and surface Brodmann areas. Generally, as far as I know, this
> is usually done by comparing % of voxels activated at some threshold in a
> region. Is there any straightforward way to do this in workbench? I could
> transform freesurfer masks and use it as a pre-threshold mask in Feat, but
> isn't there a more "direct" way to get the mask from cifti BA/aseg files?
> (extract the mask, covert to nifti) Is there anyway to apply a mask to the
> region, threshold and get a voxel count, like I would in fslmaths? Also
> with the surface regions, there aren't "voxels" with which to calculate
> activation/total. How would I go about converting surface labels to nifti
> volumes for pre-threshold masking in Feat? Or is there a better way?
>
> Much thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> HCP-Users mailing list
> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to