The FIX cleaned data have a very gentle high pass filter that mainly removes linear trends, 24 motion parameters regressed, and noise ICA components (classified by FIX) regressed. The minimally preprocessed data do not have any of these.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Mahsa Alizade shalchy
ned data".
Best,
Mahsa
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:13 PM, "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
The FIX cleaned data have a very gentle high pass filter that mainly removes linear trends, 24 motion parameters regressed, and noise ICA components (classifi
Once you are satisfied with a run having completed successfully and registered properly, you can delete the ${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/${fMRIName} folder which contains only intermediate files.
Peace,
Matt.
From: , Gregory
Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 at
I wouldn’t recommend trying to redo the preprocessing, as getting that right is complicated. Why not use the FIX cleaned data and focus on whatever analysis you are interested in doing?
Peace,
Matt.
From: Ranga Deshpande
Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 at 6:48 PM
T
What is it that you are trying to do? I’m not sure why the -cifti-separate and -cifti-create-dense-timeseries commands are in there, but you won’t have zeros if you simply run -cifti-smoothing on the cleaned dense timeseries.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Long
Date: Friday,
_
Greg Burgess, Ph.D.
Staff Scientist, Human Connectome Project
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
Phone: 314-362-7864
Email: burge...@pcg.wustl.edu
On Oct 8, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Glasser,
On 9/9/14, 2:48 PM, "Glasser, Matthew" wrote:
>I¹d recommend option ii.
>
>You can use the surfaces and label data in the
>${StudyFolder}/${SubjectID}/MNINonLinear/fsaverage_LR32k folder together
>with the dense timeseries data. To load the data into matlab, you can u
See the e-mail I just forwarded to the list.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Long
Date: Saturday, October 11, 2014 at 7:36 AM
To: Timothy Coalson
Cc: Matt Glasser , "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subjec
See the e-mail I forwarded to the list entitled: [HCP-Users] FW: Converting/analysing preprocessed rfMRI grayordinates for reading in .pconn.nii files into matlab.
Peace,
Matt.
From: 木村一皓
Date: Monday, October 13, 2014 at 2:11 AM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Please use the launcher scripts in ${GitRepo}/Examples and don’t modify the pipelines themselves unless you know what you are doing (i.e. have read and understood the code). Only the code in examples is intended for you to modify.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Jennifer Elam
As for the error message, you might not have the HCP customized gradient correction code installed (which will output different files from the original code). Make sure you have this version installed:
https://github.com/Washington-University/gradunwarp
I agree with Mike that turning gradie
e 93)
s = struct(...
Error in gifti (line 71)
this = read_gifti_file_standalone(varargin{1},giftistruct);
Error in ciftiopen (line 16)
cifti = gifti([tmpname '.gii']);
Do you have any idea what's going on and what should I do?
Best,
Ikko
2014-10-14 2:11 GMT+09:00 Glasser, Matthew
&
You should not be using the inflated surface (rather the midthickness
surface would be more appropriate). It is possible that the command does
not work correctly without a little pre-smoothing but Tim will need to
comment on that.
Peace,
Matt.
On 10/17/14, 5:29 AM, "K. Wagstyl" wrote:
>Hi HCP
It looks like that pipeline takes the echo spacing in ms instead of the rest of HCP pipelines which take the value in seconds. What were the raw values you entered into the equation there?
Peace,
Matt.
From: Micah Chambers
Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 7:46 PM
To
58 AM, Micah Chambers
<mica...@ucla.edu> wrote:
I have 10.352 for Dwelltime and 140 for number of phase encoding samples, which comes out to 0.00069.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
It looks like that pipeline takes the echo spacing in
Is that image you initially sent one of the down sampled FreeSurfer
images? It seems a lot blurrier than your raw images.
Do you use fatsat in your T1w images?
Peace,
Matt.
On 10/24/14, 1:49 PM, "Gaurav Patel" wrote:
>ok thanks...I was wondering how you guys handle errors like these? Or
>ar
cond set of
>unprocessed data screen shots came from fslview). As for fatsat, I'm not
>sure but I'll check with our sequence programmer. Do you?
>
>__
> gaurav patel
> gauravpa...@gmail.com
> www.neurofreak.net
>
>
>
>
>> O
What kind of analysis do you have in mind? There is a new ³native² matlab
CIFTI reader/writer written by Robert Oostenveld that you could give a
try: https://github.com/oostenveld/cifti, which I think reads in the
header info.
If you have issues, you¹ll need to ask him about them, as I¹ve not yet
That note in the pipeline example code was put there because I don¹t know
how to tell what readout direction was used from the DICOMs and z seems to
be the Siemens default. If someone else does, I¹d be interested in what
field(s) they used.
Gordon, I¹d be a bit surprised here if the shim mattered
What is the resolution of this fMRI data? I seem to recall someone else
had trouble with the motion correction pipeline on lower resolution data.
It may be that we need to allow an option for mcflirt in the pipelines if
the default method doesn¹t work for someone.
Peace,
Matt.
On 10/28/14, 7:45
to assume that there should be no difference between a locally generated T1w_acpc_dc.nii.gz file and the one from ConnectomeDB?
-Micah
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Xu, Junqian
<junqian...@mssm.edu> wrote:
On Oct 26, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wusm
The files with “Atlas_” are the same across all individuals, whereas the ones without are individual specific.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Linden Parkes
Date: Monday, November 3, 2014 at 1:08 AM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subject
| 0402 516 574
E:
linden.par...@monash.edu
W: www.med.monash.edu.au/psych/mcin/
B7AE8BF0-4F0C-4F0B-9BDE-B582B9331FA1
From: Glasser, Matthew
Reply: Glasser, Matthew
>
Date: 4 November 2014 at 1:11:15 am
To: Linden Parkes
>, hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] MNINonL
las_ variant to generate ROIs for tractography mean that for each participant the ROIs are going to include some of the surrounding white matter?
Does using the xfms transforms account for this?
On 4 November 2014 10:07, Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
Yes, that would allow th
Perhaps you should have one job at a time requesting all cores (and allow it to use more RAM)? That will likely be more efficient than running multiple jobs in parallel.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Oscar Miranda Dominguez
Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 at 12:15 PM
To: "hcp-
me.org]
On Behalf Of Oscar Miranda Dominguez
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:25 PM
To: Glasser, Matthew
Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] How to limit the number of cores when wb_command is running?
Ok.
I’ll try that.
I’ll also give another try to the // submission se
Please install the HCP version of the gradient distortion correction code:
https://github.com/Washington-University/gradunwarp
Tim, this error probably should be added to the FAQ as it is coming up a lot. Also, perhaps the pipelines could be tweaked to produce a more descriptive error messa
You would need to map the ROIs onto the surface for the surface portion and into subcortical parcels for the subcortical portion. You can use wb_command -volume-to-surface-mapping to map ROIs onto the surface and then you can use wb_command -cifti-create-dense-scalar
-volume <${StudyFolder}/
Vertex areas are used in resampling from the native mesh to the 32k
registered mesh (this process occurs on the sphere and aside from the
vertex areas which are calculated on the subjects native mesh and 32k
registered mesh midthicknesses the midthicknesses are not involved).
The small amount of s
Can you post a picture of what you are talking about?
Peace,
Matt.
From: liaoxuhong
Date: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 8:36 PM
To: hcp-users
Subject: [HCP-Users] About data processing
Hi:
I'm currently working with minimall
Have a look at the HCP diffusion pipeline:
https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines/tree/master/DiffusionPreprocessing
In particular scripts/eddy_postproc.sh
Peace,
Matt.
From: 木村一皓
Date: Saturday, November 22, 2014 at 3:25 AM
To: "hcp-users@humancon
bilateral inferior temporal gyrus. I hope above statement is clear, if not please contact with me.
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Xuhong Liao
-- 已转发邮件 ------
From: "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>
To: liaoxuhong <liaoxuh...@gmail.com>, hcp-
Perhaps play with the opacity settings which are visible in your screenshot? Let us know if you cannot accomplish what you want to do with those.
Peace,
Matt.
From: "Yune S. Lee"
Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 9:54 AM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
I would probably try to upsample rather than downsample to take advantage of your 0.9mm T1w (we’ve not tried 0.9mm before, but given how much better 0.8mm is than 1mm, it would probably be worth it). You could see if things run smoothly if you just use the
0.8mm template, or otherwise could
Hi Jenn,
I’m almost certain the Ugurbil citation will not be sufficient for documenting the main HCP 7T data acquisition protocol, since that was finalized after that paper was published.
Matt.
From: Jennifer Elam
Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 at 11:05 AM
To:
For whitematter/greymatter interface, it sounds like you need a surface (the white matter surface). This will be much more exact than a volume mask (e.g. if you are doing tractography, you can get quite misleading results if you use masks vs surfaces
for cortex).
As for a white matter mas
What is it that you are trying to do?
Peace,
Matt.
From: , Gregory
Date: Monday, December 8, 2014 at 10:33 AM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subject: [HCP-Users] error when setting SpinEchoPhaseEncodeNegative="NONE"
d to process
them using the fieldmaps instead. I’ve setup the PreFS/FS/PostFS using the fieldmaps, and then I run the GenericfMRIBatch script on the output of the freesurfer scripts.
-G
From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:30 PM
To: Book, Gregory;
EncodePositive \
--fmapmag=$MagnitudeInputName \
--fmapphase=$PhaseInputName \
--echospacing=$DwellTime \
--echodiff=$DeltaTE \
--unwarpdir=$UnwarpDir \
--fmrires=$FinalFMRIResolution \
--dcmethod=$DistortionCorrection \
--gdcoeffs=$GradientDistort
oPhaseEncodeNegative \
--SEPhasePos=$SpinEchoPhaseEncodePositive \
--fmapmag=$MagnitudeInputName \
--fmapphase=$PhaseInputName \
--echospacing=$DwellTime \
--echodiff=$DeltaTE \
--unwarpdir=$UnwarpDir \
--fmrires=$FinalFMRIResolution \
--dcmethod=$DistortionCorrection
n purposes. Besides, if you are going to offer a NONE option anyway, it makes sense to have the option actually work.
-Micah
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
Hi Micah,
This sort of thing is not recommended, as you cannot get an accurate r
Can you post the text of your launcher script? Only one task is run at a time inside the pipeline, so the issue will be there.
Peace,
Matt.
From: , Gregory
Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 at 12:29 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
ldMap_LR.nii.gz Dec 9, 2014 15:52:11 rwxr-xr-x 1,119,399
/analysis/unprocessed/3T/domino3/analysis_3T_SpinEchoFieldMap_RL.nii.gz Dec 9, 2014 15:52:12 rwxr-xr-x 1,127,080
/analysis/unprocessed/3T/domino3/analysis_3T_domino3.nii.gz Dec 9, 201
the spin echos? Does it assume the positive image is the same
encoding direction as the EPI and the negative image is the opposite direction?
From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Book, Gregory; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Cc: Br
=(y y- y y-)
>
>nTasklist=${#Tasklist[@]}
>nPhaseEncodinglist=${#PhaseEncodinglist[@]}
>
>if [ $nTasklist -ne $nPhaseEncodinglist ]; then
>
>fi
>
>
>Gordon
>
>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Glasser, Matthew
>>wrote:
>>
>> You need to expan
lexus, RightLateralVentricle, RightInfLatVent, RightChoroidPlexus
wmparc_del_structures = [4, 5, 14, 15, 24, 31, 43, 44, 63]
#LeftCaudate RightCaudate
wmparc_del_structures2 = [11, 50]
Thx again!
Best regards,
Eleftherios
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Glasser, Matthew
<
I’m not sure the wb_command -cifti-convert -reset options work with a dconn as the input header file. Do you have some other dscalar or dtseries file you can load into matlab and use as the header?
Then it should work fine. Also I have a new version of ciftisavereset that I could distribut
Let’s hear a confirmation from Tim Coalson that a dconn header would actually be properly reset, I’m not sure that is true.
Matt.
From: , Michael
Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM
To: Julien Dubois , "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Why wouldn’t you do this in CIFTI space?
Peace,
Matt.
From: Aaron R
Date: Thursday, December 11, 2014 at 3:12 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subject: [HCP-Users] tfMRI masking, lateralization
Dear HCP users,
I'd like to
Hi Julien,
You are not the first to report this for lower resolution fMRI data.
We¹re not completely sure why the performance is different in these cases,
however we would definitely be interested in a patch for the fMRIVolume
pipeline that allowed choosing to use mcflirt instead of mcflirt_acc fo
If your phase encoding directions are inverted, I would recommend swapping the SpinEchoPositive and NegativeImage values. This would make the computed field map have the same sign as a typical field map and then the PhaseEncodeList would not have to change.
Peace,
Matt.
From: , Gregory
Hi Julien,
We simply ran melodic + FIX on the MNI space volume results of each resting state run (i.e. the outputs of the minimal preprocessing pipelines). The cleanup was then applied to both the volume timeseries and the CIFTI timeseries. Look in the FIX distribution
for a shell script hc
I’m slightly more confused now. So, using the CMRR sequences, if I set the phase encoding direction on my spin echo to A>>P, and “Invert RO/PE Polarity” option is checked… a) what is the actual phase direction
of the data b) what is recorded in the DICOM header in the *.dInPlaneRot f
h like you describe, I'll probably whip one up for my purposes so I'll keep you in the loop.
- Julien
> On Dec 14, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> You are not the first to report this for low
l Scholar
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
http://www.emotion.caltech.edu/~jdubois
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
Hi Julien,
Thanks for sending this in. Why do you think the mid volume is b
t;
> If no one else is working on a patch like you describe, I'll probably
> whip one up for my purposes so I'll keep you in the loop.
>
> - Julien
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Glasser, Matthew
> > <glass...@wusm.wu
Probably the easiest thing to do would be to fix the outlying image dimension by editing the NIFTI header. What program are you using to convert from scanner format to NIFTI? We use dcm2nii in the HCP.
Peace,
Matt.
From: , Gregory
Date: Thursday, January 8,
24ZVW/2/HCPfMRI-MID/pipeline/step48.log-Fix this (probably in reconstruction stage) before re-running this script
From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:07 PM
To: Book, Gregory; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re: [HCP-User
l of Medicine
>Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology
>Phone: 314-362-7864
>Email: gburg...@wustl.edu
>
>> On Jan 9, 2015, at 1:59 PM, Glasser, Matthew
>>wrote:
>>
>> Can you check that the headers of these files look okay:
>>
>>
>>${StudyFolder}/${Sub
Please post your wb_command -cifti-separate command line.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Marta Moreno
Date: Monday, January 12, 2015 at 9:52 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subject: [HCP-Users] -cifti-separate
Hi users,
I am us
low
Division of Experimental Therapeutics
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Department of Psychiatry
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
On Jan 12, 2015, at 10:54 PM, "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
Please post your wb_command -cifti-sepa
e of Physicians and Surgeons
On Jan 12, 2015, at 11:01 PM, "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
I didn’t read your question closely enough. You cannot make a surface from -cifti-separate (you can make data that you can display and analyze on a surface howev
d Surgeons
On Jan 12, 2015, at 11:09 PM, "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
Is this HCP data or your own data?
Matt.
From: Marta Moreno <mmorenoort...@icloud.com>
Date: Monday, January 12, 2015 at 10:06 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wusm.wust
Our radiologist noted that it is a midline calcification and read the brain as normal.
Peace,
Matt.
From: , "Samantha [F] (NIH/NIAAA)"
Date: Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 3:59 PM
To: "supp...@humanconnectome.org" , "hcp-users@hum
It looks like you need to install the python package numpy.
Peace,
Matt.
On 1/16/15, 8:49 AM, "Juan Sanchez" wrote:
>Dear All,
>I am using Centos 6.5
>with FSL 5.0.6
>Free Surfer 5.3
>Python 2.7.6
>numpy-1.4.1-9.el6.x86_64
>
>I am trying to troubleshoot the following error When running
>PreFr
already installed and latest version
>Nothing to do
>
>____________
>From: Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wusm.wustl.edu]
>Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 9:52 AM
>To: Juan Sanchez; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
>Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] numpy error runni
fslsplit will do this, but why is it that you want to do this and why would a DICOM to NIFTI converter be a part of the process when the data are already in NIFTI format?
Peace,
Matt.
From: yamur osmanova
Date: Saturday, January 17, 2015 at 2:16 PM
To: "hcp
The most likely explanation is that the subject did not complete the diffusion acquisition session or that something was later found to be wrong with one or more of their diffusion runs. You can filter subjects to only get complete datasets in ConnectomeDB.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Michael
That should be in ${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/T1w/${Subject}/stats
Peace,
Matt.
From: Marta Moreno
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 7:59 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subject: [HCP-Users] grey matter volume
Hi users
ersity College of Physicians and Surgeons
On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:21 PM, "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
That should be in ${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/T1w/${Subject}/stats
Peace,
Matt.
From: Marta Moreno <mmorenoort...@icloud.com>
Date: T
You can also use the map number if that is the issue. Else perhaps we
need more info on what you are trying to do.
Peace,
Matt.
On 1/22/15, 9:20 PM, "Marta Moreno" wrote:
>Hi users,
>
>I am trying to get the labels from 7 RSN Networks but "map" on export
>table command is not recognized and I
How much RAM do you have? The CIFTI files use far less RAM than the
volume files, but contain all the grey matter information represented in a
way that makes combining across subjects more accurate. If you don¹t use
all the data your estimates of the subject¹s functional connectivity will
be nois
. Is this ok?
>
>Many thanks!
>Chao
>
>> On 23 Jan 2015, at 13:57, Glasser, Matthew
>>wrote:
>>
>> How much RAM do you have? The CIFTI files use far less RAM than the
>> volume files, but contain all the grey matter information represented
>>in a
>
Fellow
> Division of Experimental Therapeutics
> New York State Psychiatric Institute
> Department of Psychiatry
> Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:03 AM, "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>
>
Regards
Devakumar
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Glasser,
Matthew
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:58 AM
To: Devakumar gmail,
hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Cc: Brown, Tim
What OS is this? It’s probably too old.
Peace,
Matt.
From: "dkumar.in...@gmail.com" <dkuma
If you update to the latest version of FSL the MIGP algorithm may be in there and is designed to help with this. The main limitation with melodic has been that it was single threaded. I don’t know if that has been addressed yet.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Micah Chambers
D
t is a good bit more than 8GB now, unless the PCA is performed per subject. Has anyone done Group ICA on datasets this size?
-Micah
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
If you update to the latest version of FSL the MIGP algorithm may be in
CA is performed per subject. Has anyone done Group ICA on datasets this size?
-Micah
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
If you update to the latest version of FSL the MIGP algorithm may be in there and is designed to help with this. The
hambers
<micahc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Well the resting state data provided through the HCP around 1GB each so I'm guessing the memory requirement is a good bit more than 8GB now, unless the PCA is performed per subject. Has anyone done Group ICA on datasets this size?
-Micah
On
session. As I understood, only using 1200 volumes which is only one phase encoding direction, seems to be problematic.
What do you guys think? Is it ok to do it this way?
greetings
David
2015-01-23 16:54 GMT+01:00 Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>:
The function
You also need a T2w scan unless you want to do major hacking on the pipelines.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Jennifer Elam
Date: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 11:25 AM
To: "Harms, Michael" , 'Marta Moreno' , "hcp-users@humanconnectome
You’ll want to make sure you’re using the latest version of the main HCP public release, rather than tutorial data. You can run wb_command -cifti-correlate to compute functional connectivity from the dense timeseries data. If you want to combine across
runs, you should demean the data first u
issue of global signal, and agree with you . . . Your point about not needing to do WM or CSF time series regression after ICA FIX is quite helpful.
Thanks,
Matt
From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:55 AM
To: Hoptman, Matthew; 'hc
ctome.org>
Cc: "Elam, Jennifer" <el...@pcg.wustl.edu>
Subject: RE: [HCP-Users] probably obvious question, but . . .
Fair enough. And the movement signal regression?
From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 11:31 AM
To: Hopt
This might be a better question for the mailing list of this specific
cluster, but I believe the version of fsl_sub on the Wash U cluster still
works with PBS (I helped modify it to do this some years ago).
Peace,
Matt.
On 2/5/15, 11:48 AM, "Ramirez San Martin, Carolina"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I¹m sta
In ${GitRepo}/Examples/Scripts/PreFreeSurferPipelineBatch.sh change these variables to use spin echo field maps to correct T1w and T2w scans for readout distortion in the HCP LifeSpan scans:
AvgrdcSTRING="SiemensFieldMap"
To
AvgrdcSTRING=“TOPUP"
MagnitudeInputName="${StudyFol
How do you define failure and what kind of subjects are these? This is only intended to be a rough alignment that gets the rest of the pipeline into a “funnel” by which the alignment continues to be refined. For us, failure of the AC/PC registration
means that subsequent steps cannot work pro
Your e-mail got some attachments stripped out, but it looked like you
might have exceeded a queue limit on a cluster or something like that, as
the first error was a processing being killed.
Peace,
Matt.
On 2/12/15, 12:52 AM, "Dr Sampada Sinha" wrote:
>WARNING: This e-mail has been altered by
The code for that derivation (written by Mark Jenkinson) is posted online:
https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines/blob/master/global/scripts/aff2rigid.py
Yes *_restore means the bias field has been removed.
Why do you want to see fMRI data with and without distortion correction
e effect of distortion correction (b0 field).
- Anders
Den 12 feb 2015 18:14 skrev "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>:
The code for that derivation (written by Mark Jenkinson) is posted online:
https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines/blob/master/global/sc
Hi Alex,
Those were translated directly from FreeSurfer’s master LUT file, so you’ll have to ask them… :)
Peace,
Matt.
From: Alex Cohen
Reply-To: "alexco...@gmail.com"
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 11:17 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnecto
dolescent Neurology
E-mail:
cohen.alexan...@mayo.edu (Medical/Science Email)
E-mail: alexco...@gmail.com (Lifetime Email)
Mayo Clinic
200 First Street SW
Rochester, MN 55905
mayoclinic.org
------------
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:19
What is MarsBar? That sounds like a type of candy…
Peace,
Matt.
From: Mary Meacham
Date: Friday, February 13, 2015 at 1:41 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org"
Subject: [HCP-Users] Using MarsBar on HCP data
Hi there!
Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
What is MarsBar? That sounds like a type of candy…
Peace,
Matt.
From: Mary Meacham <mary.kate.meac...@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, February 13, 2015 at 1:41 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome
rve me the same way?
--Mary Kate
On Feb 13, 2015, at 1:48 PM, "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
Hopefully someone out there uses SPM with HCP data and can comment, as most of us use FSL/Connectome Workbench.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Mary Meacham <mary.ka
We recommend you run tractography directly from the surfaces using probtrackx2. You can use these surfaces if you want your other volume (i.e. non-cortical) ROIs in native subject space:
${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/${Subject}.${Hemisphere}.white.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
Or these
ri_label2vol assumes that the labels derived from the annot files are defined for the ?h.white surface, but I wanted to see if
this is actually the case. Should I use, e.g., ?h.white.hires instead?
John
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Glasser, Matthew
<glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote
Note that a major reason we didn’t use these physiological confound regressors was they don’t exist for every subject, so be sure to select a subset of subjects that have them. We’d also be interested to know if you found they were helpful.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Stephen Smith
Why do you need to use FLIRT/FNIRT with already registered data? As for the others and aside from the flags you already mention, I think the recommendation for bedpostX will include these flags:
-n 3 (for 3 fibers)
--cnonlinear
--rician
--model=3
Not all of this may yet be available in the
Also to Steve: if these are used after ICA+FIX, don’t they need to have the 24 motion parameters and noise ICA component timeseries confounds regressed out as well, before being used on the cleaned data?
Peace,
Matt.
From: , Michael
Date: Monday, February 16, 2015 at 1
1 - 100 of 1742 matches
Mail list logo