Re: glpk 5.0 release information

2020-12-21 Thread Chris Matrakidis
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 01:38, Andrew Makhorin wrote: > This bug is not fixed yet, because both ssx_chuzc and ssx_chuzr will be > replaced by new versions. > Andrew, what are your plans for the next glpk versions? As you know I have some stuff that I would like to upstream. Best Regards, Chris

Re: glpk 5.0 release information

2020-12-20 Thread Andrew Makhorin
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 19:54 +0100, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote: > It's there on the commit messages.but here they are too: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glpk/2020-07/msg9.html This bug was fixed. > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glpk/2019-07/msg0.html This bug

Re: glpk 5.0 release information

2020-12-16 Thread Domingo Alvarez Duarte
It's there on the commit messages.but here they are too: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glpk/2020-07/msg9.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-glpk/2019-07/msg0.html This one https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/commit/c7abf466f0e31b3eeb1cf1bfd2b7c0dc8e05edad apparently

Re: glpk 5.0 release information

2020-12-16 Thread Andrew Makhorin
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 16:59 +0100, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote: > It seems that the problems reported on the mailing list and it's > fixes  > are not in this release: > > https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/commit/6c9c1de01e10a99de89a94746bad65 > 6dcc4f9838 > >

Re: glpk 5.0 release information

2020-12-16 Thread Domingo Alvarez Duarte
It seems that the problems reported on the mailing list and it's fixes are not in this release: https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/commit/6c9c1de01e10a99de89a94746bad656dcc4f9838 https://github.com/mingodad/GLPK/commit/356faa9710ec7375e49615bd794258c914b9ae63