Hi there
My site has a lot of static pages, and I'm hoping I can use Cloudfront
to host them and stop requests hitting Heroku.
(Yes I know there are other possibilities like memcached and varnish)
Does anyone know of a good guide in setting this up? It's not very
clear to me.
thanks
--
You
Hi have to URLs which are identical except for a differing query
string
I was expecting them to be cached differently but they are not :(
Is this because varnish ignores query strings? . or do I have a
bug in my app?
thanks :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
You are doing this in the backend? Some people are checking the user
agent in the front end... but that seems too late (if u can help it)
What are your differences in what is delivered?
Do you have different markup and content for mobile? If so I guess
caching your URIs might be difficult if
Yes, I was about to say all these techniques (other than the css
media queries) require a hit to the backend.
Ideally there would be detection on the edge/cloud, so varnish cache
can kick in where possible without hitting a rails stack or sinatra.
Still, good ideas in this thread.
--
You
Some Content Delivery Networks offer device detection and ESI based on
this.
This is the ideal solution, but too far outside of the Heroku sandbox
- maybe?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Heroku group.
To post to this group, send email to
This has appeared on the Add-Ons page
But a google search reveals nothing
Anyone know who provides this service?
Would be good to know more details. I'm looking for a cost effecting
way to manage image resizing, and this could be ideal.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Ah thanks for that
Not clear it is suitable for image manipulation... as that kind of
task is quite beefy, requiring memory, grunt and awkward libraries
like imagemagick
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Heroku group.
To post to this group, send email
Hi everyone
Is there a way to force Action Caching to cache to Varnish and not use
Memcache?
Yes I fully realise this might cause (?) the next request to hit
Varnish and not my app, which defeats the purpose of Action Caching
and I should use Page Caching... but I have my reasons :)
If there
Is this possible?
Any hacks, atleast?
Does the Lacquer gem work with Heroku?
Thanks for any tips :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Heroku group.
To post to this group, send email to heroku@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Hey
The price difference for 100mb Redis or Memcache is only $5
I may have it wrong, but thought Redis provides very similar
functionality, with extra useful functionality
Why or when would someone chose Memcache over Redis?
Redis is promoted as a way to store sessions, so I assume it is
Adam Wiggins kindly put up a cache manifest example:
http://cachemanifest.heroku.com/clock.html
I notice that this does work when I reload the page that is already
open in iPhone Safari
However if I load the clock url on a fresh safari page, the cache does
not kick in.
Is this a heroku issue?
Just as an aside
Does Varnishing as much content as you can protect you from DDOS?
It would cover your app backend but is Varnished content on Heroku
so heavily cached that it is impenitrable?
I assume it must be, since a Reddit attack is as bad as DDOS, and
Vanish is what people recommend
Hi
First of all, I realise Heroku encourages us to upload directly to S3.
However I'd like to manage that upload via Heroku first.
Two questions:
1) With Heroku I understand your request can have some temporary space
for file uploads. Can I rely on that space to exist for a few minutes
while a
This comment on Hacker News got me thinking:
And with hilarious I mean really hilarious, as in the $3500 price
point for a 50G memcached instance. For that money you can also buy a
physical server with 64G RAM every month, fresh from the factory...
--- http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1664914
Thanks Oren that worked
Anyone interested can simply test by hitting the index on this
controller
class ThingsController ApplicationController
require 'rubygems'
require 'RMagick'
def index
img = Magick::Image.read(#{RAILS_ROOT}/public/images/
rails.png).first.scale(5).to_blob
RUBY_PLATFORM works for me, fyi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Heroku group.
To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
Hi there
RMagick does not seem to be installed on bamboo-ree-1.8.7 If I do
require 'RMagick' at the console it is not found.
Are there plans to install it?
I tried including it in my Gemfile but it gives the error Can't
install RMagick 2.13.1. You must have ImageMagick 6.4.9 or later.
Saw this on heroku's twitter:
http://bestbuyideax.com is now blazing along on 8 dynos at @heroku.
Really? Seems to me that site has the same level of dynamic content
as a quiet discussion forum. (a few topics a day, a few replies a
day, a few i like this actions). Correct me if I'm wrong.
18 matches
Mail list logo