Manik can better comment on plans for having separate configurations
(e.g. optimistic vs pessimistic, invalidation vs replication) for
different regions of the cache. But, I know it's not a soonish thing.
That means if you want different behavior for the different types of
caches you need
But now looking back at #1, I am no longer certain of the conclusions;
and to me the wiki did not make it clear to me what the long term
solution was supposed to be (nor really what the short term solution
is/was either). Anyone remember the specific conclusions with regards
to this
Steve Ebersole wrote:
Re: #4 : what exactly are these differences? Now is the time to
merge it back...
Forgot to attach the diff to my last message. Here it is.
- Brian
---
C:\dev\hibernate\Branch_3_2\Hibernate3\src\org\hibernate\cache\TreeCache.java
Mon Feb 19 17:05:11 2007
+++
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
That means if you want different behavior for the different types of
caches you need separate caches. If the JGroups multiplexer is
available, that's not too bad, as the caches can share a channel. If
we think it through well, they can likely share an overall
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/hibernate-oracle10-testsuite?log=log20070411012950Lbuild.10
BUILD COMPLETE-build.10Date of build:04/11/2007 01:29:50Time to build:23 minutes 36 secondsLast changed:04/10/2007 10:54:07Last log entry:HHH-2533:
