>Hmm - isn't this idiom inefficient ?
>Doesn't parent.getChildren().add() (or any method on the collection)
result
>in loading all the children ?
I am planning to make same small changes so that add() and remove()
*don't* force initialization of a readonly="true" collection. I should
have done this a while ago....
>If the only intention is to add the child to the parent shouldn't the
>child.setParent(parent) be enough ?
Not if the many-valued end has cascades.
********** CAUTION - Disclaimer **********
This message may contain privileged and confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message (or responsible for delivery of the message to
such person) you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message
is prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
you should destroy it and kindly notify the sender by reply
e-mail. Please advise immediately if you or your employer
do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of
Expert Information Services Pty Ltd ("The Company")
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
The Company advises that this e-mail and any attached
files should be scanned to detect viruses. The Company
accepts no liability for loss or damage (whether caused
by negligence or not) resulting from the use of any
attached files.
**EIS******** End of Disclaimer **********
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
_______________________________________________
hibernate-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
