On May 28, 2006, at 10:50 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
And I guess you really want it disjunct from the mapping and not
just where the assocation is already defined ?
class name=User
...
set name=rules fetch=select
...
profile name=login fetch=join/
/set
set
It occurred to me today that you could avoid my objection just by
defining the fetch profile in its own section of the XML, instead of in
the association mappings. eg.
profile name=login
association name=User.roles fetch=join/
association name=User.orders fetch=select/
/profile
Exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
And I guess you really want it disjunct from the mapping and not
just
where the assocation is already defined ?
---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and
and if that is what it takes, then let that be it ;)
/max
Exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
And I guess you really want it disjunct from the mapping and not
just
where the assocation is already defined ?
--
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
