:
http://www.dds-lite.com/
And even MS Visio has the capability to do this...
-Original Message-
From: Bear Giles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:00 PM
To: Steve Ebersole
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] hbm - ER diagram tool?
What's a good schema -ER tool
FYI, I just started a massive merge from the v21branch onto the v22branch
this afternoon. There were/are a lot of discrepencies and conflicts that I
need to resolve manually. That's the reason for a lot of the issues you are
seeing.
I am hoping to finish it up tomorrow in the AM. I definitely
Very cool!!!
Guess I'll have to get eclipse and try it out :)
Great work...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Max
Rydahl Andersen
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 5:24 PM
To: hibernate-devel
Subject: [Hibernate] new event monitor in Hibern8IDE
OK, so here's the initial shot at allowing configuration of the listeners...
The dtd changes:
!ELEMENT listener EMPTY
!ATTLIST listener type
(auto-flush|copy|delete|dirty-check|evict|flush|load|lock|refresh|replicate|
save|update) #REQUIRED
!ATTLIST listener class CDATA #REQUIRED
!ELEMENT
Joshua, this was discussed prior to doing the merge. Sorry if you missed
it. I pulled everything over to HEAD that was current on the v22branch at
that time. I then tagged the v22branch. You should simply be able to do a
merge with your stuff against that new v22branch tag, and then apply that
I added that one as I needed to test some session caching related
functionality and had no idea where that test might fit in amongst
ABCProxyTest and FooBarTest :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gavin
King
Sent: Wednesday, June 23,
Title: Message
And
SessionCacheTest has only one test. If it fails, then yes that is a
problem. But make sure you have the latest code.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joshua
DavisSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 7:39 AMTo:
P.S., the current HibernateContext could be leveraged to perform this
(this is exactly what it does through a TransactionLocal).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 3:32 PM
To: hibernate list
As long as both of the sessions are on the same underlying Connection
this should be achievable. Otherwise you'd run into txn isolation
issues.
Using the current HibernateContext code as an example, we could
implement something like flush on retrieval. HibernateContext does
something very
Intelli-J has the notion of modules. A project in Intelli-J is made up
of one or more modules. A module base can be inside the overall
project directory structure. Is that what you mean?
How do your directories look? And how do you want them partitioned?
-Original Message-
From:
I use oracle 10g for my testing and it is actually almost twice as slow
against those drivers. The first version I wrote used arrays as opposed
to lists, but I found the performance hit of using Lists minimal enough
to warrant the easier programming model.
I still need to test this against
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:hibernate-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Ebersole
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 7:35 PM
To: Max Andersen; Hibernate development
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] WRAP_RESULT_SETS
I use oracle 10g for my testing
Not currently; but that's not at all hard to add.
I am assuming you want to perform syntax highlighting or something like
that.
It's a trivial thing, but consider something like count which is a
keyword depending upon usage. Think of a mapped entity that has a
property named count, like maybe
I think you might want to reconsider the perspective of the phrase you
are rude. Telling people what they should/should not do sure seems
awfully rude to me!
So are you volunteering to setup/host/administer the NNTP server?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the late reply, I've been out for the holidays and
simultaneously rebuilding my system from its hard-drive crash.
The read-only stuff would not fix this issue, as I understand it. From
what I think that user is asking for, he still probably wants to the
flushes against the main entity
. That was not my intent to imply such a thing.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 10:18 PM
To: Steve Ebersole
Cc: Max Andersen; Hibernate development
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] someone looking at flushing performance...
Steve Ebersole wrote
My fault. It is fixed now
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua
Davis
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 8:00 AM
To: Hibernate-Devel
Subject: [Hibernate] DynamicFilterTest failures
The 'New tests suite' used to pass, now DynamicFilterTest
Because it takes an Object parameter.
If you want to add constants, please do not do it in the core. There's
a big problem currently with the amount of effort needed to add
additional Listeners (as Gavin and Kabhir discovered while doing the
ejb3 stuff). An extra class to modify to add a new
You would definitely need the first to properly handle introspected type
resolution.
For the second, I think they would normally just put binary as the
type, but I would think an additional byte[] type mapping could not
hurt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Not sure which DB you are using, but for example I've noticed that HSQL
seems to not parse the entire statement string upfront which can lead to
issue like this. It leaves parsing certain pieces relative to its
internal working datasets; if there are no results in those working
sets, you get no
Rydahl Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 2:30 PM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate development
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Criteria curiosity...
but this check is something hibernate generates. its not db dependent
AFAIK.
Not sure which DB you are using
This is a usage question and has no
relevance to the furthering development of Hibernate. Please use the user
forums.
Thank you.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Safdar Kureishy
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005
9:02 PM
To:
It's v30beta4; it's there. How were you looking for it? ViewCVS?
Remember that there is a lag between those servers on SF.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Veitas
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:48 AM
To:
SAP (or at least MAXDB, which it became) has two modes of operation: normal
and oracle. The oracle mode simulates oracle-style theta syntax; the normal
mode uses ansi-style joins. Any particular reason we explicitly use the
oracle mode?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, any particular reason we explicitly allow the oracle-mode usage to
continue? ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max
Rydahl Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 8:57 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Gavin King; hibernate-devel
Theta-join syntax is supported. The issue was HQL index-access (i.e.
the [] stuff) and HQL collection-functions on theta-join dialects.
The collection functions are working. AFAIK, the index-access thing is
still a problem (at least there is a test case in HQLTest failing for
this reason when
NM, I just fixed it :)
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:54 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Gavin King; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today?
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:33:00 +0200, Steve Ebersole
[EMAIL PROTECTED
So I've been looking and thinking about this ability to define filter
conditions on many-to-many/ such that they apply to the associated
table (not the just association table, which is what we have now). So
the current thinking here is to allow another filter/ within the
many-to-many/; something
: Gavin
King
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005
12:01 PM
To: Steve Ebersole;
'hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] 3.0.2
The problems you were
having that you thought were bugs in OJL: were they actually bugs in existing
functionality, or was it just a problem for the new
I still need to figure out the filter
issue with Loader reading different values (FK vs. PK) for the many-to-many.
After thinking about it some more decided
to commit what I have since it does fix that other issue.
Im working on the other right now.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A fix of a very nasty bug in eager-releasing connections.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Bauer
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 11:58 AM
To: hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
Nothing that has to make 3.0.4.
My current focuses are to move forward
with the bulk statement support, some refactoring of the tuple stuff, and
improvements to the event stuff.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gavin King
Sent: Monday, May 16,
I am not sure what thing Gavin is mentioning when he says he and Scott
found an issue. So this is based off an almost 2 month old discussion
Scott and I had.
From my discussions with Scott, it was more an issue that Hibernate
attempting to configure the JACC provider itself was simply a broken
We were just talking about the delete use case last night in relation to
bulk deletes. I think it really comes down to how we want to
conceptualize the filters. Initially they were envisioned solely as a
mechanism for filtering returned data. What we are talking about here
is a serious
OK DB2 and TimesTen gurus :)
I am adding the insert ... select ... functionality to HQL. For
sequence generated ids I am not sure of the syntax of how to do this for
DB2 and TimesTen dialects.
The normal Dialect.getSequenceNextValString() returns a complete
statement (select + sequenceName +
Oops! That was me.
There was an over-sight with the new code
to determine the collections in which an entity is a participant. It is
fixed now
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Davis
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 6:42
AM
To:
Not sure what exactly this has to do with the development of Hibernate.
I think you are looking for the user forums.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sameer
Nanda
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:47 AM
To:
Not sure what exactly this has to do with the development of Hibernate.
-Original Message-
From: fabio quimbay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 3:36 PM
To: Steve Ebersole
Cc: hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] More information on How
Easy copy-n-paste ;)
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 4:59 PM
To: Steve Ebersole
Cc: hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] More information on How to Hibernate with PostgreSQL
Lol,
This is actually
We are talking about moving to log4j...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
Hawkins
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 8:49 AM
To: Christian Bauer
Cc: Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] commons logging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
In working on this functionality to test the support for database
generated values, I ran across an interesting issue with unit testing
this functionality. Basically, the only real way to test this in a
consistent fashion across all databases is to apply triggers to the
database in use for
exactly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max
Rydahl Andersen
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 6:40 AM
To: Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Re: testing question
The trick below doesn't work well when you run the unittest standalone
Actually, probably even better:
public interface DatabaseObject {
public String sqlCreateString();
public String sqlDropString();
}
;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Ebersole
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 7:54 AM
. It
simply returns warnings. I modified this test to fix this bit...
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 6:36 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: testing question
This is the same reason why I always get failures on the tests
=org.hibernate.dialect.OracleDialect/
/database-object
If anyone wants different name(s), speak now or forever hold your
peace...
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
Ebersole
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 8:01 AM
To: Hibernate
compared to my first example, right? I simply chose CDATA
tags to enclose my text, where you did not...
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:58 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] RE: testing question
i don't like database
5:58 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] RE: testing question
i don't like database-object, but I don't have a better suggestion,
so...(maybe just ddl ?)
I do though have some trimming suggestions:
database-object name=blahBlah
createCREATE INDEX .../create
drop
Of
Christian Bauer
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 1:55 PM
To: Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] RE: testing question
On Aug 8, 2005, at 8:48 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
If anyone wants different name(s), speak now or forever hold your
peace...
I think it should have a name= attribute so
Let's move this discussion over to:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-840
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:58 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] RE: testing question
i don't like database
be the same issue...
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:58 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] RE: testing question
i don't like database-object, but I don't have a better suggestion,
so...(maybe just ddl ?)
I do though
for this.
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 2:32 PM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] RE: testing question
mainly for tooling.
/max
Why a name, though? I was not planning on allowing lookup of these
things as I don't see a benefit
huh? we have no table/ element...
I'll check it in like this. If you feel that strongly about it, feel
free to change it.
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 2:20 PM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate devel
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] RE: testing question
string format, just embed the date string.
UserVersionTypes might possibly even be doable. I'd have to think it
through a bit.
_
From: Gavin King
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 5:39 PM
To: Steve Ebersole
Cc: hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
If you mean will we have 3.1 final out by the end of this week; no. We
are approximately 2 weeks away from 3.1rc1.
There is one change I am aware of that would cause problems with the
JBoss-Hibernate integration code regarding a change made to how
event-listeners are registered.
-Original
A simpler solution would be to just add a writeObject() impl to
HibernateException which culls the cause if it is not serializable
(either to null or some marker).
This would be all encompassing. Plus it would still allow the cause to
be known (so long as no attempt is made to serialize it).
Why? You can call clear() on collections marked as final. Obviously
you could not null them out...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max
Rydahl Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 8:44 AM
To: Gavin King; Emmanuel Bernard
Cc:
Here's another concern with the current impl for
ThreadLocalSessionContext: the static accessors. Basically the way
this is setup right now, users will nt be able to use this
simultaneously for multiple session-factories...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Of
Christian Bauer
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:25 AM
To: Hibernate development
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] ThreadLocalSessionContext javadoc inconsistency
Steve Ebersole wrote:
Here's another concern with the current impl for
ThreadLocalSessionContext: the static accessors. Basically the way
then
keep a map of SessionFactory - Session.
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:21 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate development
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] ThreadLocalSessionContext javadoc inconsistency
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:15:01 +0200, Steve Ebersole
FYI,
I made the JDBCContext.hibernateTransaction field transient. This
worked around this issue of serializing a session with an associated
transaction, which also allowed me to expose more of the methods of
Session/SessionImplementor on the proxy generated from
ThreadLocalSessionContext.
So as far as I am concerned, I am ready to push out 3.1rc2. Anything
anyone else wanted to get into this before I cut it?
I hope to get time to do it this weekend. If not, it'll be early next
week.
Here is the change-log so far:
** Bug
* [HHH-1045] - Example contains inner classes that
through the event listener system
(create-onflush tag)
I still need to test, but I'll be able to commit by the end of the
week-end
2. How does the type discovery work? Did you add a typeless
setParameter() to the Query?
Steve Ebersole wrote:
So as far as I am concerned, I am ready to push out
There maybe some setting we are just missing for test purposes. For
example, I don't know about you, but on my Oracle setup I disable
recovery logging on the datafiles backing my test schema. Without
disabling this option, it is painfully slow to run the testsuite against
Oracle; and obviously I
Hibernate 3.1 rc2 has just been released. It contains some minor bug
fixes and changes to handling of connection release mode.
Please see the Change Log and Release Notes for more details:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=364170
The release can be downloaded at:
As an fyi...
I just checked in a bunch of changes related to how queries
translations are cached. I added a new concept of query plans and a
QueryPlanCache to encapsulate the role that used to be filled by the
building and caching of the QueryTranslator arrays within
SessionFactory. This has a
SQL query caching is in there...
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 11:53 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate development
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] query plans
Nice stuff - give a ping when sql query caching is in there somewhere ;)
btw. if you know
Yes, try reading what you quoted from me again ;)
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 3:24 PM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate development
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] query plans
SQL query caching is in there...
ok - where ? Can't find it.
And from your
Geez... SF dev CVS is *still* down; highly annoying!
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ebersole
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 10:26 AM
To: Scott M Stark; Max Andersen
Cc: Hibernate development
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] you just gotta love sf.net
I plan to have a look
Hibernate 3.1rc3 has just been released. This release contains various
bugfixes, as well as improvements and enhancements regarding caching of
HQL and native SQL queries.
Please see the release notes and changelog for more details:
Yes, futile silly inane discussions such as this one kill my enthusiasm and
interest a little bit every day...
Tell you what: you run your project the way you want, I'll not interfere;
ergo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leonardo
I tag CVS first, and then use that to do the build. So no problem
there...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
Hawkins
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:48 PM
To: Hibernate devel
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Hibernate] Provision of source-only
In relation to
http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-73
(Statistics for HQL queries use pre-processed query string):
The original issue behind this case is now easy to fix because of the
introduction of query plans. The query plans know about the query
strings before any
I guess we could make it so. This issue is that currently it does not
know the non-expanded query.
-Original Message-
From: Gavin King
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:51 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Hibernate devel
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] query statistics
Could the query plan cache both
query.
-Original Message-
From: Gavin King
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:55 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; 'Hibernate devel'
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] query statistics
Right. The only downside would be increased mem usage, I suppose.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ebersole
Sent
Can you give me the connection info to the various db instances? I'll
try running these manually and see how long things are taking. Or have
you tried this already?
With Oracle for example, it is pretty important how the underlying
database is setup in terms of how fast/slow the testsuite runs.
6:05 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Gavin King; Hibernate devel
Subject: RES: [Hibernate] query statistics
just a quick response.
the priorities for the tools is:
A. get the underlying sql(s)
B. get the guessed types of the parameters
C. get the locations of the parameters in HQL and SQL
A and B
I plan on releasing 3.1 final next week, unless something unforeseen
comes up.
Please take a look at the JIRA issues assigned to you for inclusion in
3.1 to see if you will be able to complete them. Please let me know
about any issues.
Sweet, just in time ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max
Rydahl Andersen
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:55 PM
To: Hibernate development
Subject: [Hibernate] Fwd: antlr 2.7.6rc1 available
updated antlr rc with our fixes included
Already planned:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1050
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Emmanuel Bernard
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:25 AM
To: Hibernate development
Subject: [Hibernate] HQL UNION
I
Hibernate 3.1 final has been released. It includes numerous bug-fixes
and enhancements as well as upgrades to a few libraries. For details,
check out the change log:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=377721group_id=
40712
The release can be downloaded at:
Not all databases handle DDL the same in
terms of transactional semantics.
The simple (and most natural) solution is
to bootstrap your SessionFactory (and thus run hbm2ddl) when the app
deploys/starts-up, not on first access.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hibernate 3.1.1 has just been released including mainly bugfixes and
minor improvements. For details check out the release notes:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=386304group_id=
40712
Downloads are available at:
You want the user forum: http://forum.hibernate.org/
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Srinivas Jadcharla
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006
3:20 PM
To:
hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Hibernate] bind
variables Question
Hi there,
A custom Dialect should be enough, although you may need to
appropriately set some configuration properties as well...
The best thing to do is to simply try running the Hibernate test suite
using your custom dialect; that'll give you an idea of what type/level
of SQL support Hibernate is
Hibernate 3.1.2 has just been released:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=40712package_id=1
27784release_id=388971
This release fixes, amongst other minor bugs/enhancements, bugs with
Session closure checking, some potential bugs in HQL parameter binding,
and issues with
LOL, I am still trying to checkout that beast ;)
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 10:24 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hibernate] Hibernate 3.1.2 released
This has been added
BTW
I have just branched cvs for the purposes of 3.2 development, as 3.2 is
expected to introduce a number of API changes (mainly minor stuff in
some of the extension APIs) and some different behaviors required for
EJB3. The branch is named Branch_3_2 if you are interested...
advanced work on HEAD. In this case branch
for 3.1.x?
This is a very old discussion that seems to come out of my memory.
Steve Ebersole wrote:
BTW
I have just branched cvs for the purposes of 3.2 development, as 3.2
is
expected to introduce a number of API changes (mainly minor stuff in
some
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] hibernate 3.2
Steve,
is 3.1 stuff in HEAD ?
Thanks
On Thursday 02 February 2006 04:35 pm, Steve Ebersole wrote:
BTW
I have just branched cvs for the purposes of 3.2 development, as 3.2
is
expected to introduce a number of API changes (mainly minor stuff
You should do it as part of every commit. It is far more painful to do
large occasional merges.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max
Rydahl Andersen
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:08 AM
To: Hibernate development
Subject: [Hibernate]
Yes, I plan to start using these conventions starting with 3.2.
I'm not a big fan of all minor releases needing to append '.ga' (i.e.
3.1.3.ga.jar). I really wish there was a way to define ordering amongst
qualifiers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The thing that we discussed (and I have just not yet had time to
implement) is actually converting QueryExceptions that contain antlr
stuff during serialization by either writeReplace() or writeObject().
Initially we had discussed just stripping the cause in the case of antrl
exception, but
Well I think the distinction here is that Hibernate constitutes a hard
dependency on Antlr. The users choice to use Oracle is completely
within their control.
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 8:41 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; Scott M Stark;
jboss
What does the SQL look like to access this?
-Original Message-
From: Bompart Cedric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 3:40 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE : [Hibernate] livelink collections server
Hello,
The livelink
Ahh [EMAIL PROTECTED]@#E
Sorry my fault. I commited the support for the new JBossCache
optimistic locking model, but forgot to commit the new jar.
Give me a sec...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Bauer
Sent: Friday, February
The keystone of that logic is the
org.hibernate.cache.CacheConcurrencyStrategy. Have a look at the
different implementations of that interface.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shalon
toy
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:30 PM
To:
The EJB3-persistence-spec requires that LockModeType.READ and
LockModeType.WRITE acquire physical database update/exclusive locks for
the duration of the current transaction. Currently we have mapped
LockModeType.READ to LockMode.UPGRADE and LockModeType.WRITE to a new
LockMode.FORCE
Sure, I can get Damon to move all of it. I thought there was some stuff
you could not move due to your eclipse work?
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:19 AM
To: Steve Ebersole; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate
I kinda ignore stuff from you mostly ;)
-Original Message-
From: Max Andersen
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 3:34 PM
To: Steve Ebersole; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hibernate] Subversion move
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:50:38 +0100, Steve Ebersole
[EMAIL PROTECTED
having a very hard time actually grabbing the backup
tarballs from SF as somehow the connections keep getting dropped on me
in the midst of the download, so I want to build in some leeway for that
as well.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ebersole
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:06 AM
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
