-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents but I don't
think most people would be in favor of jail time for cheaters.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Dustin Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you hack
will
suffice in the mean time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin Wyatt
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually
, November 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents but I don't
think most people would be in favor of jail time for cheaters.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Dustin Wyatt [EMAIL
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin Wyatt
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents but I don't
think most
time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin Wyatt
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents
please bear in mind that there are a lot of false positives with vac ^^
Being VAC banned is not proven guilty?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents but I don't
think most people would be in favor of jail time for cheaters.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:03 PM
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin Wyatt
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents but I don't
think most people would be in favor of jail time for cheaters
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin Wyatt
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents but I
You obviously have proof to backup that statement?
2008/11/21 Philip Bembridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please bear in mind that there are a lot of false positives with vac ^^
Being VAC banned is not proven guilty?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list
How many are false positives? How many are positives? I am very interested.
please bear in mind that there are a lot of false positives with vac ^^
Being VAC banned is not proven guilty?
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
The logic does hold, the VAC ban is only 1 year, so if you rob a bank you
are sent to jail for some amount of time. Durring that time you are
banned from all other activities. Sounds like a fairly good analog to me.
Now to address Scott, how did you get HL1 VAC banned if you didn't use a
cheat?
Gregory Matherne wrote:
The logic does hold, the VAC ban is only 1 year, so if you rob a bank you
are sent to jail for some amount of time. Durring that time you are
banned from all other activities. Sounds like a fairly good analog to me.
Actually, VAC bans never go away. Not sure why you
They are permanant now, they haven't been 1 year for ages
Leonard L. Church wrote:
Gregory Matherne wrote:
The logic does hold, the VAC ban is only 1 year, so if you rob a bank you
are sent to jail for some amount of time. Durring that time you are
banned from all other activities.
Missed the update on that... Anyway if they are permanant then I agree
banning for all games might be a bit over the top.
On 11/21/08, Tom Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are permanant now, they haven't been 1 year for ages
Leonard L. Church wrote:
Gregory Matherne wrote:
The
= death penalty
- Original Message -
From: Tom Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
They are permanant now, they haven't been 1 year for ages
] On Behalf Of Gregory Matherne
Sent: Saturday, 22 November 2008 4:41 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
Missed the update on that... Anyway if they are permanant then I agree
banning for all games might be a bit over the top.
On 11/21/08, Tom Leighton
The length of the bans does not matter because cheaters are never
banned, only their account is. It's like taking the robbers shotgun
away and put it in jail for a year, five years or forever, it does not
matter, because the robber is still free and will just buy or steal a
new shotgun. Next day
to rectify it.
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:39:32 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
The length of the bans does not matter because cheaters are never
banned, only their account is. It's like taking the robbers shotgun
away and put
In the end, neither I nor most of the other admins care what the hell you
all say. We'll do what we want with our servers. I will definitely think
about implementing this vac ban plugin as long as it has a white-list. If
someone bothers to post on my site saying they were banned but would like
For the plugin, it would be nice to restrict bans to 1 engine. Im pretty sure
the bans in the database arent all known yet or active to ban from servers for
VAC.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list
dito, found him on my ban list. Funny than he/she hasnt a vac ban yet.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Paloma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list'
hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's a stupid idea. Hey, I'm vac banned on the HL1 engine, therefore I
must hack in every game I own, right?
Donnie Newlove wrote:
Well, his VAC status does not look good for him so its true that he is
a cheater, but he has probably not been caught by VAC on the Source
engine.
This plugin
Right.
On 11/20/08, tgnwells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a stupid idea. Hey, I'm vac banned on the HL1 engine, therefore I
must hack in every game I own, right?
Donnie Newlove wrote:
Well, his VAC status does not look good for him so its true that he is
a cheater, but he has
If you hack on one engine, you're likely to hack on another. Even if
that wasn't true, I can't think of a better deterrent than thread of
banning from all Valve games.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:30 PM, tgnwells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a stupid idea. Hey, I'm vac banned on the HL1 engine,
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents but I don't
think most people would be in favor of jail time for cheaters.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Dustin Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you hack on one engine, you're likely to hack on another. Even if
that wasn't true, I
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin Wyatt
Sent: 20 November 2008 23:04
To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
If you hack on one engine, you're likely to hack on another. Even if
that wasn't true, I can't think of a better deterrent than thread of
banning
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
That's not true, I actually can think of better deterrents but I don't
think most people would be in favor of jail time for cheaters.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Dustin Wyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you hack on one engine, you're likely to hack on another
So I wanted to play on my server, 18 poeple on it, filling up... so while I
load, this hacker gets on with his aimbot/speed hack as sniper, and
basically makes most people quit, there are only 5 people remaining when I
get in game.
You have no Idea how enraged I was over this, I told him I was
2008/11/20 Ben B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I wanted to play on my server, 18 poeple on it, filling up... so while I
load, this hacker gets on with his aimbot/speed hack as sniper, and
basically makes most people quit, there are only 5 people remaining when I
get in game.
You have no Idea how
Why should we bother to ban someone if you can't be bothered to provide
evidence?
Ben B wrote:
people were leaving in droves, i wasn't going to waste time recording a demo
when it was so obvious.
http://gs1.1.fpsbanana.com/psychostats/player.php?id=2051
look at this stats, 50 snipers kills
put his ID in google, and you will see that he has been banned from multiple
server for speedhacks/aimbots.
That along with my psychostats page should be just as good as a demo.
He emptied my server, and I was getting rid of him as soon as possible.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Kitteny Berk
make a note of them in case
others encounter them.
And before the issue is raised - I fully support public display of the hacker's
IP and Steam ID.
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:44:36 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
Why should we
@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
Why should we bother to ban someone if you can't be bothered to provide
evidence?
Ben B wrote:
people were leaving in droves, i wasn't going to waste time recording a demo
when it was so obvious.
http://gs1.1.fpsbanana.com/psychostats
ID.
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:44:36 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: Re: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
Why should we bother to ban someone if you can't be bothered to provide
evidence?
Ben B wrote:
people were leaving in droves, i wasn't going
This guy was already on my list, but thanks. I hate how one guy can empty
out the place.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben B
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 4:10 PM
To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com
Subject: [hlds] TF2 Hacker
So I
Well, his VAC status does not look good for him so its true that he is
a cheater, but he has probably not been caught by VAC on the Source
engine.
This plugin still does not exist yet, but when it does it will change
that, I'm looking forward to it.
http://www.vacbanned.com/plugin.php
On Thu,
37 matches
Mail list logo
