--
Hi there!
I have a problem with my public HLDS Linux server.
Until the server reaches 15 players, the ping is fine (~20 ms).
But if there are 15 or more players on my server, the ping goes up to
~100 ms.
The internet connection is a good one, linux kernel is 2.6.9,
Pentium 4 1,7ghz, 512Mb
what is your upstream? 15 players need ~600k of upsteam. 1.7g should be
able to ran 32ppl.
chris
Martin Zwickel wrote:
--
Hi there!
I have a problem with my public HLDS Linux server.
Until the server reaches 15 players, the ping is fine (~20 ms).
But if there are 15 or more players on my server,
Alfred said something about it not so long ago. I think it was along the lines
of we are completing cs:s and dod:s then if time permits and there is incentive
to do so they would look at tfc:s. I have a rubbish memory so it may have been
'we are not making tfc:s ever'.
-Original
The information was already public,
Sure it was public on warez sites or whatever but why spread it ? You actively
have to search for those things, people don't need it delivering to their
inboxes.
and other than valve who cares if
some people get HL2 for free, it doesnt effect my ability to
Any addons in use? AMX co. are cpu-terminators ;) (in some versions)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 23.11.04 09:40:31:
what is your upstream? 15 players need ~600k of upsteam. 1.7g should be
able to ran 32ppl.
chris
Martin Zwickel wrote:
--
Hi there!
I have a problem with my public
Once you know it exists it's pretty easy to find flawless instructions
to implement it, though I'm positive VALVe is trying to correct the
issues, it's just a complex task. Believe it or not, there are some
flaws in systems that are extremely difficult to fix, whether it's a
flaw in Windows or
--
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:42:06 +0800
Christopher Luk [EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled:
what is your upstream? 15 players need ~600k of upsteam. 1.7g should
be able to ran 32ppl.
hmm, I don't know the upstream exactly, but I thought 4-6 kb per client
is enough of upstream. (If the netstat window of
--
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:08:23 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled:
Any addons in use? AMX co. are cpu-terminators ;) (in some versions)
yeah, amxx v0.20.
--
MyExcuse:
Operators killed when huge stack of backup tapes fell over.
Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Research Development
TechnoTrend
kBytes not kbits ( so 32 - 48 kb per user ). So between 12 and 19
players per 600kb/s.
- Alfred
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Zwickel Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 1:20 AM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 01:32:42 -0800, Alfred Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kBytes not kbits ( so 32 - 48 kb per user ). So between 12 and 19
players per 600kb/s.
I'd also like to point out that latency goes up quite rapidly when you
approach the maximum transfer for a circuit (e.g. even if
Hello,
Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 09:17:00PM -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal:
Anyone have any optimizations/tweaks to the os/network that they want to
share? I thought it might be beneficial to start a thread on it so we could
get input from everyone to see what works / doesnt work.
For Linux...
in my experience (with the first hlds version under cs 1.5/1.6), the 2.4.x
performance on pentium4 was terrible. i then upgraded to 2.6.x and kept sticking
with it every since, even though i'm currently using dual athlon mp boxes.
as far as i recall, most ppl agreed that the performance with 2.6.x
Try updating to AMXX version 1.0 with new binaries. I tried 0.20 a while ago
and it was
definitley to laggy with more than 16 players on the server.
Other helpful commands to lower bandwith on clientside:
sv_maxrate 7500
sv_maxupdaterate 35
Just try.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 23.11.04
--
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:16:08 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled:
Try updating to AMXX version 1.0 with new binaries. I tried 0.20 a
while ago and it was definitley to laggy with more than 16 players on
the server.
Ok, upgraded to 1.0. Hope it helps...
--
MyExcuse:
Recursive traversal of
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hi all!
Lately I have seen post all over the Internet, even in this list, that
suggest to set rate/sv_maxrate to 25000.
I believe that the max. value of those cvars are 2, have this changed
since 1.5?
Anyway, I can't find any reliable info on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any addons in use? AMX co. are cpu-terminators ;) (in some versions)
Not any default version of AMX I have ever run. And I have run pretty
much all of them. Now, installing 300 some odd plugins or misconfiguring
it then sure.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2
The CPU load on our cs:s servers is INCREDIBLE low!
Great job VALVe :D
Thanks :D
_
MSN Zoeken helpt je om de gekste dingen te vinden! http://search.msn.nl
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list
Last I heard (sometime over a year ago), Erik had mentioned that CS 2 and TF
2 will be sold as complete games, not as a MOD. But, I'd bet that a 3rd
party MOD team will create a TF style MOD within the first 6 months after
the final SDK is released. As history has shown, it'll probably pwn
Yeah.. because we all know VALVe is incapable of making a good game.
[/sarcasm]
As history has shown, it'll
probably pwn Valve's efforts anyway.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
I'd really like to know when we can expect a CSS update. When it was
officially released as part of the pre-order, it was very obvious very
quick that it was really just the Beta with a few more maps added.
When will the AI and bots be activated?
When will we be allowed to manipulate objects like
Michael McKoy schrieb:
I'd really like to know when we can expect a CSS update. When it was
officially released as part of the pre-order, it was very obvious very
quick that it was really just the Beta with a few more maps added.
When will the AI and bots be activated?
When will we be allowed to
--
I'm not sure this is the correct list to post this (linux server list).
However, I'd like a server update too ;)
The server part give me this unfinished fell too, but I think it was
already discussed here.
--
DjoDjo
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 01:56:45PM -0500, Michael McKoy wrote:
I'd really
--On Monday, November 22, 2004 9:13 PM -0700 Matt Heler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies = 0
# change syncookies to 1 if you will use them
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn = 0
net.core.rmem_max = 8388608
net.core.rmem_default = 262143
net.core.wmem_max = 8388608
net.core.wmem_default = 262143
Valve Cracks Down on 20,000 Users
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/23/1723232
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
This is not true for counterstrike or Czero. It is totally dependant on
a lot of factors. Maybe true at standard rates but players change these
as soon as they find out how 2.
It is possible to pull 11kb/sec through per client at full rates on a
good server.
Server setup can effect this also,
I agree - i run Gentoo on one box and CentOS on the others and both have
2.6.x kernel. Outperforms 2.4 mostly on HT and Dual CPU boxes (mp and xeon).
It has alot of other things going for it like the hz= is set to 1000 vs 100
for the 2.4 kernels.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah I agree - full 16 player Cs:s server on a p4 2.8ghz - the usage is
around 12-20% when full. Im happy lol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of wouter v/d
Bergh
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Yes, 30% with 20 players on an AMD 2600.
I hope this will be still a number after future srcds updates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 23.11.04 22:53:01:
Yeah I agree - full 16 player Cs:s server on a p4 2.8ghz - the usage is
around 12-20% when full. Im happy lol
-Original Message-
Hello, I have prepare the files for a HL2 server but a file is missing:
server_i486.so for HL2.
If ValveSoftware can release dans send me this file, it could be great.
Thanks for an answer.
Destroy Dav
www.adminreseau.com
www.quadparty.com
___
To
Yeah.. because we all know VALVe is incapable of making a good game.
[/sarcasm]
They make a good game... just haven't made a good original MOD. But,
they're pretty good at grabbing MODs from others and making $$ off of them.
Then again, there are those MODs that come out of the gates nicely,
Thats a really low cpu useage. I spike up to 30% on aztec on dual
opteron 250's and 3 gigs of ram.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah I agree - full 16 player Cs:s server on a p4 2.8ghz - the usage is
around 12-20% when full. Im happy lol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just checked it again using top and 14/16 players are on it and its using
around 13-20%. thats using a .5 refresh time on top.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of hondaman
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
has VAC and such been fuly enabled yet? Last time i checked that
was MIA..I will wiat to sing valve's praises if VAC is truly up
and running at a lower load.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked it again using top and 14/16 players are on it and its using
around 13-20%. thats using a .5
Personally I hope they get some sense about them and ditch VAC and leave it
to a 3rd party. They havent updated VAC for 1.6 since when? Sept 11 or some
crazy out of date date. They cant keep up.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William
Warren
PunkBuster won't do it without source access and payment, so.. yeah :/
- Bruce Bahamut Andrews
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I hope they get some sense about them and ditch VAC and leave it
to a 3rd party. They havent updated VAC for 1.6 since when? Sept 11 or some
crazy out of date date.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I hope they get some sense about them and ditch VAC and leave it
to a 3rd party. They havent updated VAC for 1.6 since when? Sept 11 or some
crazy out of date date. They cant keep up.
Actually I believe it
guys excluding the lacking from vac as of late
pb is no better then anything else.
pb covers many games that don't nearly have as many hacks as cs.
cs has at least 20x more hacks then any other game if not all of them
combined
so i got no idea why i think it would do a better job.
it didn't in the
Yeah exactly - and i KNOW there are hackers in the servers ive been playing
in. Im sorry but skill just doesnt let you make a HS while jumping thru the
air around a corner. All the weps are highly inaccurate while in the air.
People come around corners already aiming at me all the time. They may
Brian A. Stumm wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, HoundDawg wrote:
Yeah.. because we all know VALVe is incapable of making a good game.
[/sarcasm]
They make a good game... just haven't made a good original MOD. But,
they're pretty good at grabbing MODs from others and making $$ off of them.
Then
39 matches
Mail list logo
