Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-24 Thread Ian mu
PB is loads better than pretty much anything out there in reality. You can see that by the effect of the community. CS is known as a game full of cheats and hacks..thats its reputation now, all the games with PB have been pretty much restored so that there is no dominance of cheats. Sure there

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-24 Thread sirtom__
Because: the other game-publisher care (much more) about their community. PB is great. Great in adminstration and bandwith. Maybe, with the big success in HL² Valve has now more money to spend into anticheat-divisions... I hope that VAC2 will do a turnaround - in technique and update-times...

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-24 Thread Eric (Deacon)
In a bold display of creativity, Ian mu wrote: PB is loads better than pretty much anything out there in reality. You can see that by the effect of the community. CS is known as a game full of cheats and hacks..thats its reputation now, all the games with PB have been pretty much restored so that

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-24 Thread Eric (Deacon)
In a bold display of creativity, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah exactly - and i KNOW there are hackers in the servers ive been playing in. Im sorry but skill just doesnt let you make a HS while jumping thru the air around a corner. All the weps are highly inaccurate while in the air. People come

RE: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-24 Thread admin
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric (Deacon) Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers In a bold display of creativity, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah exactly - and i KNOW there are hackers

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-24 Thread Ian mu
Such as? It sounds to me like you're suggesting that Macs have fewer viruses written for them because they have a great anti-virus program inherent in the OS, not because they're nowhere near as common as Windows boxes. -- Eric (the Deacon remix) Nope, I'm not, every game out there has

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-24 Thread Eric (Deacon)
In a bold display of creativity, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats what i mean with the downloaded skill lol. If they can consistently jump around a corner already aiming at you and hs you time after time after time and have 3:1 or better then I spectate them. Maybe they hack - maybe they lucky -

[hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread wouter v/d Bergh
The CPU load on our cs:s servers is INCREDIBLE low! Great job VALVe :D Thanks :D _ MSN Zoeken helpt je om de gekste dingen te vinden! http://search.msn.nl ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list

RE: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread admin
: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers The CPU load on our cs:s servers is INCREDIBLE low! Great job VALVe :D Thanks :D _ MSN Zoeken helpt je om de gekste dingen te vinden! http://search.msn.nl

RE: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread sirtom__
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of wouter v/d Bergh Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers The CPU load on our cs:s servers is INCREDIBLE low! Great job VALVe :D Thanks :D

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread hondaman
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of wouter v/d Bergh Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers The CPU load on our cs:s servers is INCREDIBLE low! Great job VALVe :D Thanks :D _ MSN

RE: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread admin
: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers Thats a really low cpu useage. I spike up to 30% on aztec on dual opteron 250's and 3 gigs of ram. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah I agree - full 16 player Cs:s server on a p4 2.8ghz - the usage is around 12-20% when full. Im happy lol -Original Message

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread William Warren
refresh time on top. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of hondaman Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers Thats a really low cpu useage. I spike up to 30% on aztec on dual opteron 250

RE: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread admin
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers has VAC and such been fuly enabled yet? Last time i checked that was MIA..I will wiat to sing valve's praises if VAC is truly up and running at a lower load. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread Bruce \Bahamut\ Andrews
. They cant keep up. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William Warren Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers has VAC and such been fuly enabled yet? Last time i checked

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread Jay Carter
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally I hope they get some sense about them and ditch VAC and leave it to a 3rd party. They havent updated VAC for 1.6 since when? Sept 11 or some crazy out of date date. They cant keep up. Actually I believe it

Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread Kingsley Foreman
in the past. Kingsley - Original Message - From: Bruce Bahamut Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 3:05 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers PunkBuster won't do it without source access and payment, so.. yeah :/ - Bruce Bahamut Andrews

RE: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers

2004-11-23 Thread admin
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jay Carter Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU load cs:s servers This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally I hope they get some sense about them and ditch