Rafe, what thickness papers would you say the HP 130 is not well suited
for? 308g? Is it the paper handling capability that is the issue?
Raphael Bustin wrote:
At 02:53 AM 2/4/2005 +, Aex wrote:
I think the HP 130 is a ground breaking advancement into the area I
would like to go,
Andy, who sells these compatible inks?
Bill
Andy wrote:
Greetings to all. Here goes my first post:
Two scenarios:
A) printing on combination of originial HP #85 inks for the HP 130
with original HP paper (the swellable ones such us HP premium plus
photo and proofing gloss). This is
Disregard this changed colors of email text and background, could
not see the link...sorry...
Bill
Bill G wrote:
Andy, who sells these compatible inks?
Bill
Andy wrote:
Greetings to all. Here goes my first post:
Two scenarios:
A) printing on combination of originial HP #85
Michael thanks for sharing your hard earned data with the group...
Michael E. Gordon wrote:
I've noticed that there is a large set of technical documents filed
under the business support center.
Thank you, Christopher. I once again spent 1.5 hours on the phone today with
HP
Just go to radio shack, get a 24 or 120v fan, mount on outside, and run
seperate power, this will assure no overheating!
neil_snape wrote:
on 20/03/2005 12:13, HPDesignJet_Printers@yahoogroups.com wrote :
You need to drop 12 volts at 0.15 amp
E=IR ...R=E/I = 12/.015 = 800 ohms.
I was considering not responding to this, as my last post touched on
most of this. But to the benefit of some, I will gamble and try again.
There is much over looked here and I know many photographers are
resolution freaks, including me.
The only question is, can the HP printers
somehow
Rafe
I need no convincing that pixels from a good digital
capture carry more information than pixels from a
film scan;
The more should say, more accurate, a pixel, a dpi,
it's all one spot in a grid.
I've seen ample evidence of that myself,
but it has no bearing on my
And this is what I'm saying is... well...
not very smart. There's no more information
in that 900 meg file than in your 18.4 meg original.
Just to be clear, as this can benefit many new users to
digital files, and we all seemed to be tricked by this
there is no more
Very impressive Qimage site
I guess they demonstrated their software does a better job of uprezz
than PS. Not surprising, as PS does not hang its hat on upsizzing.
What I found interesting was, when a highly detailed file was sent to be
further upsized, the differences were nill,
and resolution is, ONLY 5% of an image, i.e. the point
of exact focus actually records the max detail the film can hold, say 50
lp/mm, but the near and far points on most landscape shots are in the 10
lp/mm range. It's the nature (and shortcoming) of optics...
Bill G
Website: http
Andrew, some good information on those links
The basic conclusion is that 6 - 10 lines per mm is the absolute maximum
visible to a good naked eye at a range of 25 cm (10 inches). Converting
to inches we get a maximum dpi of 250 with a more realistic value of
200. (If you want to allow
And let's not forget, we're talking about
alternate ways of inventing data -- dressing
up the pig, in other words.
H heee yeah, we all desire to make pretty
pigs. BTW, talk about dressing up A standard digital file
after spit out of any RAW converter
This is an important point. We are not talking about original data, but
modified
data and data in layers. My partner Rob, a Photoshop professional, often works
for an hour on a customer image. It is a business decision to save the
modifications within layers.
Marty Markoe
Marty,
Mike, but I do not think the fixative sprays protect against UV light?
correct?
Did he comment on spraying them with clearcoat type products which are
UV protective?
Bill
I've been in contact with HP's Larry Stonestreet in San Diego CA. He
indicated that if you use HP's Photo Matte Paper
Is the vivera issue resolved yet? this was a press release by HP, not
sure of date. I am still baffled why HP states you can use many fine
art papers with the HP5500 printer which uses Vivera inks, but does not
allow for such with the 130? maybe they are just behind in updating
Bill: Is the vivera issue resolved yet?
I'm waiting for an official answer from HP on this, however lots of people
there are on vacation so who knows when it will come.
Harald, I am interested in your findings, and appreciate
your list contribtutions
Regarding the
On this Wilhelm Epson White Paper a pdf file, page 6,
he states, HP95 and HP97 are Vivera Inks. So the Vivera inks are not
unique to the HP130. but what other carts are these inks in... I
think the name change mid stream is part of the confusion but still
does not explain the
Harald
Hey Bill, I seem to be missing something here. Before I sent that last
e-mail, I checked the HP site, looking at the pages related to the DJ5500
printer
(printer pages + supplies pages), and I could not see any use of the word
Vivera. Are you perhaps referring to another printer with
* Here is what the HP media team says about Vivera differences (just received
this from HP): The bottom line is that HP 'tunes' each Vivera inkset for the
particular application. So, for example, print speed or plain paper gamut or
gloss on photo media are the types of attributes we tune to
neil
Hahnemuhle 308 prints beautifully with this printer in both colour and BW.
Profiles are available on the HP site for these now.
I assume this is Photorag...? If so, sheets or rolls?
Can it handle sheets this thick?
Bill
Yahoo! Groups
Nice Work Haralad.now we finally know everything about Vivera inks!
Bill
:
Hi Gang,
Here's a follow-up based on a FAQ sheet dated May 2005 I just received from
HP (these are extracts):
Q5: What is the correct pronunciation of ‘Vivera’?
A5: The correct pronunciation of Vivera is
Why not use the 196 Han. PR paper instead? i believe the surface is the
same, right?
Bob Wise wrote:
I believe 308 is too thick for the front slot, per the printer spec. The rear
slot is just barely within spec. Try that.
-Bob
_
From: HPDesignJet_Printers@yahoogroups.com
sorry, I meant 188 a previous poster mentioned this paper was
different than 308, but both called PhotRag?
Why not use the 196 Han. PR paper instead? i believe the surface is the
same, right?
Bob Wise wrote:
I believe 308 is too thick for the front slot, per the printer spec. The
Kirk
Nice post A few things to consider
1) I have tested many 5000 - 5500 Kelvin lights, and most are not even
close typically they fall in the 4000K range... these include OTT
lights, specifically suited for daylight viewing and are quite
expensive. Some measured
Bob, why the fixative first?
So what was the fade resistance?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. Stop slavery.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/WpTY2A/izNLAA/yQLSAA/vIg0lB/TM
Before I put this puppy on ebay, I figured this list may be interested
HP130 in factory sealed carton
write me off list...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet
26 matches
Mail list logo
