On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Neal Richter wrote:
I noticed that.. but what I did also notice is that I didn't see
that the mifluz code officially had copyright assigned to the
FSF.
He can't assign copyright to the FSF since it involves some code which is
not his, least of all the Berkeley DB
According to J. op den Brouw:
Time to try to include the SSL patch permanently in, say, 3.1.7?
Joe R. Jah wrote:
FYI,
ssl.9 33
Most definitely not! I don't have statistics on how many downloads
htdig-3.1.6.tar.gz has gotten, but it's very likely one or two
