Re: [htdig-dev] FOUND IT!!!! (Was: Bug :( )

2003-06-23 Thread Neal Richter
Could you post a few more details? Do you have a patch I can play with? I'm looking for that term in both the New Riders Berkeley DB book and in the onone BDB documentation. Thanks. On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Lachlan Andrew wrote: Greetings all, I think I've finally found the *source* of the

Re: [htdig-dev] Re: Report on Native Win32 memory leak fixes

2003-06-23 Thread Geoff Hutchison
On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 09:03 AM, Lachlan Andrew wrote: have to implement a proper fix before the beta goes out. However, I don't think I'll have time for that for the next two months :( Translation: I'm in favour of your checking it in. Ditto. -Geoff

Re: [htdig-dev] 3.2.0b5 Next progress check :)

2003-06-23 Thread Geoff Hutchison
I don't think Geoff was saying we *shouldn't* use 2.7. It's just that we haven't actually *tested* it under 2.7. If (when :) you can confirm that it still works under 2.8, Right. Sorry for the confusion. If it works under gcc-2.7, so much the better! But IMHO, we should be pushing people towards

[htdig-dev] b4 make succeeds on Solaris with Sun c++!

2003-06-23 Thread Neil Kohl
Lachlan, Success! Note that one test -- t_htsearch -- failed; see output below my .sig. I'm digging htdig.org right now and will post results tomorrow. -- Neil Kohl Manager, ACP Online [EMAIL PROTECTED] PASS: t_htdig tempWords: 'also:0 ' Boolean: 'also:0 ' initial: '' Fuzzy on: also

Re: [htdig-dev] FOUND IT!!!! (Was: Bug :( )

2003-06-23 Thread Neal Richter
Here's Lachlan's diff to db/mp_cmpr.c if(CDB_db_create(dbp, dbenv, 0) != 0) --- /* Use *standalone* database, to prevent recursion when writing pages */ /* from the cache, shared with other members of the environment */ if(CDB_db_create(dbp, NULL, 0) != 0) He is indeed talking about the