Re: [hugin-ptx] Can you calculate position and FOV of cameras using Hugin for 3dsmax?

to good old self-hosted SMTP. On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 22:46 +, Yuval Levy wrote: > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 08:47 +1100, Terry Duell wrote: > > I'm drawing on a vague memory here. I reckon that tutorial, or at > > least > > one similar to your description, was by Yuval Levy i

Re: [hugin-ptx] Can you calculate position and FOV of cameras using Hugin for 3dsmax?

On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 08:47 +1100, Terry Duell wrote: > I'm drawing on a vague memory here. I reckon that tutorial, or at > least > one similar to your description, was by Yuval Levy if that's any > help. my memory is as vague, but a search engine did the trick. blast from the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Request : forum migration

On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 20:25 -0500, Pat David wrote: > Leaving already? :) Did I ever come back? > Or was that more of a "goodbye, please leave"? That would have been inappropriate. I hope you did not understand it that way. > Just to clarify I did not want to embark into spending time I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Request : forum migration

On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 14:51 -0700, Patrick David wrote: > Howdy all! Hello and goodbye. I've retired from Hugin for years. Lack of time. When I saw this thread, I had a few thought that I first kept to myself. After all, we want the project to thrive beyond the lives of individual

Re: [hugin-ptx] Looking for SW able to stitch pictures taken in a narrow space - cabinets, comms rooms, etc.

On 2017-07-29 01:42 AM, makr...@gmail.com wrote: > I face a problem when taking pictures in a comms rooms try doing each side of the wall separately first (each wall, floor and ceiling), and then stitch them together. on each wall, place the control points manually, and place them on the

Re: [hugin-ptx] new image stitching software

On 16-07-28 05:05 AM, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > What bothers me more is this: > http://molanisvr.com/78-molanis-vr/76-360-vr-image-stitching-software > > To me his now promoted software looks exactly like hugin. I assume (?) that > mr. Valdes will act according all license obligations he has to

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2016.0 beta 1 released

On 2016-01-25 10:42 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: It can be downloaded at sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin/hugin-2016.0/hugin-2016.0.0_beta1.tar.bz2/download >>> >>> After a lot of searching, I discovered that the real download link is >>>

[hugin-ptx] ACTION REQUIRED

Hi Hugin community, Below is a message I just found in my mailbox. Before you continue to read, I suggest that you watch the youtube video sent with the message and make up your own mind. The link: Give your feedback directly to Sourceforge -- contact details

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: GUI overhaul

Hi Terry, and everybody else: On 15-09-21 01:55 AM, Terry Duell wrote: > [snip] > >> >> Yes, I had a few complaints about the redesign. None of my complaints >> were given any response beyond the above, 'Your issue doesn't cause me >> any >> concern' and boiled down to 'you'll get used to it.' >

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: buliding panomatic fails on Ubuntu 9.10 / AMD64

Wow, You quote my message from almost six years ago! Can you post the error message? The patch is quite trivial, have you tried replacing the whole three patched lines with something like #include stdio.h ? You may need to give it a path too, find if and where the header is installed in your

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Github anyone?

+1 to move the codebase away from SF. On 15-07-18 11:32 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote: If hugin switched from HG to GIT using launchpad as repository hoster would be the natural choice since the bugtracker is already there. Have I missed something? I thought launchpad was using Bazaar. I am

Re: [hugin-ptx] Shooting a subject from all directions, similar to cartography

On 15-05-03 06:43 PM, piccolbo wrote: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-iyuyJUGhLGU/VUafJWL6qNI/ON0/yvlmQmuSgEI/s1600/_1070218%2B-%2B_1070238.tif Does anyone understand what is going on, let alone how to fix it? Thanks Ciao Antonio, the described process would only work if your bowl

Re: [hugin-ptx] lensdb - too generic name for binary?

On 15-05-03 02:04 AM, Andreas Metzler wrote: How about using hugin-lensb or lensdb-hugin? +1 for hugin-lensdb (I assume the lack of *d*) to be a typo. Yuv -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin's website rework (long term project)

Hi Vaclav, On August 29, 2011 02:01:53 AM Vaclav Cerny - vatoz wrote: I have added translation branch to hugin-web site. Main script g.php is meant to be run offsite, to generate translated pages, it includes process documentation. Thanks. I have looked into it, which means I could read and

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin's website rework (long term project)

On September 1, 2011 04:00:36 AM cri wrote: On Aug 28, 8:58 pm, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: What would it take for Hugin to adopt transifex? It's really simple from a translator's point of view. You just need to create an account and start translating via a web interface. [1] I looked

Re: [hugin-ptx] pyHugin: A Gui exercise in python/pyside

On August 29, 2011 12:22:17 PM Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: I haven't tested it yet, but seems like a bad timing: http://lists.pyside.org/pipermail/pyside/2011-August/002816.html Let's hope pySide development will continue. If it does not, it is still enough compatible with PyQt to fall back on

Re: [hugin-ptx] cpfind - max matches?

On August 30, 2011 05:29:41 AM Jeffrey Martin wrote: Sorry Yuv but this is a completely useless strategy, either you get too many points or not enough. Sorry Jeffrey. 1 - do not shoot the messenger and 2 - no need to apologize for the obvious. You asked if there is a way to limit the number

[hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.2.0 released

... not! Hi list, I wish this mail would be announcing a release, but IMHO RC4 is not of final quality and I can not declare it final. The more sensible option IMHO would be to issue an RC5. But I will leave that decision to whoever wants to take over. There are fixes in the default branch

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin's website rework (long term project)

ciao Cristian, sorry you had to wait so long for my reply - I had not yet recovered from my notebook's HDD crash that my desktop's HDD crashed as well (Murphy's law: the replacement HDD was on the desk for three days). I spent most of my time at the PC in the last two weeks recovering data

Re: [hugin-ptx] pyHugin: A Gui exercise in python/pyside

On August 27, 2011 05:27:11 PM Harry van der Wolf wrote: After all the discussions about building a Gui in python, I decided for myself to simply try it and use PySide (1) as graphical part. Well done! Amazing! Thanks for sharing. All I had to do, on my nearly blank new Kubuntu box, was:

Re: [hugin-ptx] cpfind - max matches?

On August 22, 2011 11:55:17 AM Jeffrey Martin wrote: Is there a way to limit the number of CP's as a-s-c does ? First, you can limit the max number of points per bucket with --sieve1size CPfind partitions the images into a grid of buckets with --sieve1width and --sieve1height. Both have a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 22, 2011 09:49:23 AM Jeffrey Martin wrote: slightly OT: does anybody know what has happened to http://panoverflow.com/ ? It says simply The website panoverflow.com has been disabled. If you are the administrator of this Stack Exchange 1.0 site, please email se1-

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 22, 2011 09:51:37 AM Jeffrey Martin wrote: Is the usage of QT by Autopano Pro (and Autopano Giga) the reason that those programs work exactly the same way (i.e. really well, no obvious errors in UI, etc.) on mac, windows, and linux? I can't say the same for Hugin. I don't know if

[hugin-ptx] Heads Up Translators

little changes to the 2011.2 release notes on the web: * removed time reference in New since 2011.0 preamble * more details about OS X 10.7 Lion * new known issue: OpenSuse 11.4 http://hugin.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/hugin/hugin-web/rev/c00b1af9673b thanks Yuv signature.asc Description: This

Re: [hugin-ptx] Building 2011.2.0 RC4 on Ubuntu

On August 21, 2011 07:27:39 AM Thomas Pryds wrote: I added the hugin repository and installed all dependencies through apt- get might be that a dependency has changed. Would it be better if I start the process from scratch and post a log of the messages from this process instead? (there were

Re: [hugin-ptx] Problems with windows build

On August 21, 2011 12:39:33 AM Jeff wrote: I had the same problem trying to compile Hugin after being away from it for a couple months (see https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/hugin-ptx/Q-KrS38SJ_Y). I'm glad to see others trying to compile for Windows as well. Sorry for this. I made

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin's website rework (long term project)

On August 18, 2011 05:12:31 AM cri wrote: I agree with Vaclav considerations about gettext. I also want to add that with a gettext infrastructure the updates on webpages text can be more easily tracked by any translator simply by updating the po file. And how would such a system deal with

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin's website rework (long term project)

Hi Cristian, On August 16, 2011 02:42:03 am cri wrote: I also would like to rework the layout and graphics of the website Thanks. That's sorely needed. I've been just fixing the current layout for a (slow) start, making the HTML more CSS-designable. I like what you did with GNUcash. It is

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.2.0_rc3 released

Hi Allan, On August 16, 2011 07:38:12 am AKS-Gmail-IMAP wrote: There remains something fundamentally wrong with how new stitch processes are added to PTBatcherGui in OS X. Thank you for testing and for your feedback. Do I need to open a specific bug entry for this or is there one already?

HEADS UP: rc4 comaing soon (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.2.0_rc3 released)

Hi Terry, On August 16, 2011 03:22:26 am Terry Duell wrote: Sorry for the late response. late? what's late? RC3 builds OK here on fedora 15 x86_64, and very preliminary tests look OK. great. I haven't had the time thus far to do my usual level of testing, but hopefully will be able to

[hugin-ptx] translators: 2011.2.0 release notes updated once again

Hi translators, I added mention of the newly contributed Danish translation in the release notes [0]. Please updated. Thanks Yuv [0] http://hugin.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/hugin/hugin-web/rev/fc4dfd8b35b7 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.2.0_rc3 exception CORRECTED

Hi, On August 15, 2011 12:07:09 pm PhG wrote: After a while, on win2k SP4, Hugin exits with an exception here (below), I just put ***image center shift*** to 0 it seems not to be reproducible I am surprised that Hugin still works on Win2K. Nothing intentional to break it will be done, but

[hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.2.0_rc4 released

-xrc.sh 2011-07-27 23:18 +0200 Vaclav Cerny va...@seznam.cz (6973435c5a20) Updated Czech translation src/translations/cs_CZ.po 2011-07-27 10:45 -0400 Yuval Levy y...@users.sourceforge.net (43f8cb0a32ae) Updated Brazilian Portuguese translation (Luís Henrique Camargo Quiroz) src

Python Windows (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2011.2.0_rc3 released)

On August 16, 2011 01:57:54 pm Matthew Petroff wrote: Hugin 2011.2.0-rc3 binaries for Windows are now available. Thank you, and sorry for making it obsolete right away with an rc4. Actually in technical terms rc3 and rc4 are the same, only two translations differ, so there is no need to rush

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 16, 2011 09:11:08 pm Charlie Reiman wrote: I hope someone has already mentioned Blender (www.blender.org) No. The proximity is so obvious, thank you for mentioning it. Implementing a private non-standard UI has a certain advantage in that documentation and advice don't involve

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.2.0_rc4 released

Hi Terry, On August 16, 2011 10:09:12 PM Terry Duell wrote: Builds here OK on Fedora 15 x86_64. I realise that the change from rc3 is minor, but still worth checking. thanks. yes. I appreciate your support. Yuv signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Please test this patch (overview issue)

Hoi Harry, On August 13, 2011 05:37:48 pm Harry van der Wolf wrote: no python in 2011.2 for OSX. Thank you for the detailed report. I understand the situation and I thank you for your efforts. Without you, OSX users would not have any Hugin to play with. Yuv signature.asc Description:

[hugin-ptx] Translators: 2011.2.0 release notes changes

http://hugin.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/hugin/hugin-web/rev/0c8a40cd5fa9 thank you for updating the notes in your own language to reflect the changes: * Lens Calibration Tool: quadrant is more specific/precise than 1/4 * Python Scripting Interface: one new paragraph mentioning that the feature is

[hugin-ptx] Hugin-2011.2.0_rc3 released

-27 10:45 -0400 Yuval Levy y...@users.sourceforge.net (43f8cb0a32ae) Updated Brazilian Portuguese translation (Luís Henrique Camargo Quiroz) src/translations/pt_BR.po 2011-07-27 10:44 -0400 Yuval Levy y...@users.sourceforge.net (219a244726f4) Updated French translation (Jean-Luc

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 14, 2011 05:32:45 am kfj wrote: I spent half a day surfing and inverstigating, looking for a suitable substrate. I appreciate that and agree with you that we need more investigation. when having a good long look at what Qt (and it's python binding pyQt) Have you checked PySide

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-sift-c working better than cpfind on small rectilinear images

On August 14, 2011 05:47:43 am kfj wrote: it's the image's content that lends itself better to be detected with either one or the other detector. Most likely. If, of course, we'd find that in certain use scenarios one definitely outshines the other, this would be helpful. Not that I expect

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 14, 2011 03:43:38 pm Bruno Postle wrote: On Sun 14-Aug-2011 at 02:32 -0700, kfj wrote: Bruno also seems to think it's a good idea: On 14 Aug., 00:20, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: I've been using bitbucket for a while. I haven't had any connectivity issues, and the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Please test this patch (overview issue)

Hi Terry, On August 11, 2011 09:37:40 pm Terry Duell wrote: I'm not sure if my experience helps or not, but the patch doesn't seem to be doing what you intended. Helps a lot, thank you! It confirms to me that the patch causes the error on more than one machine. I still can't explain why,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Please test this patch (overview issue)

Hi Harry, On August 12, 2011 02:14:34 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: As I'm the only one on OSX who encountered this FPW error only 2-3 times and all other OSX users mention that they never experienced it, I prefer the attached patch. Makes sense. At the moment I don't think that this patch

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 11, 2011 01:00:22 pm kfj wrote: On 11 Aug., 15:09, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: On August 11, 2011 05:17:41 am kfj wrote: I beg to differ. I hope it will be better, because it should be faster and crash less. Will you deliver? I rather under-promise and over-deliver

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: autopano-sift-c working better than cpfind on small rectilinear images

On August 13, 2011 03:54:58 am kfj wrote: On 12 Aug., 16:14, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote: i've noticed in a few cases that autopano-sift-c does a better job finding CP's than cpfind. do i need to upload some example images? has anyone else noticed this issue? I'd not

Re: [hugin-ptx] Please test this patch (overview issue)

On August 13, 2011 09:10:45 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: Have you any idea when an 2011.2-RC3 can be released? I still have the ambition to do something about the threading issue, but I don't have much time and it is new territory for me. There are some encouraging remarks on the tracker

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 11, 2011 06:16:18 am Stefan Peter wrote: wxPython already _is_ a wrapper for wxWidgets. So, no need to reapeat this work. What need to be wrapped are the Hugin-specific widgets (and it is a lot of work), which technically speaking are wxWidgets but are too app-specific to be

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 11, 2011 06:51:43 am Gnome Nomad wrote: Yuval Levy wrote: http://www.sqlite.org/famous.html Hmm, I've used Firefox for a long while. I think one of the reasons that it is slower is the use of SQLite. (And, perhaps, the fact that much of its UI is really running Javascript

[hugin-ptx] Please test this patch (overview issue)

Hi all, Maybe somebody can help me make sense of the following weird observation. In a nutshell: I have written a simple patch (attached) to override the saved configuration and hide the overview. It triggers what I think is the error on my machine: no matter what the initial status of the

Re: [hugin-ptx] Please test this patch (overview issue)

Hi Terry, On August 11, 2011 08:43:32 pm Terry Duell wrote: The attached overview.patch turns up here as some text from what looks like a hg help file. duh! should have checked it (typo in the command to produce the patch). attached is the correct patch, thanks for testing. Yuv diff -r

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

while waiting for build-install cycles to complete, I had the time to write this. On August 8, 2011 09:15:37 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: = User friendliness (not mentioned before, but my point of view): I can't read Kay's mind, but I think that user friendliness is one of the major motivator

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On August 9, 2011 08:57:07 am Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: There is no reason to be insulting. It is insulting to experienced veterans when people with less understanding of the issues come to half-baked conclusions; pretend that their conclusions are universally valid; and keep arguing without

Re: [hugin-ptx] Releasing 2011.2.0 and declaring the next release cycle a bugfix release

On August 7, 2011 02:33:48 pm Harry van der Wolf wrote: Both default and 2011.2 are OK and build OK. Both include the original 3 changes as well as my latter changes. If the current 2011.2 branch becomes RC3 I'm fine. In that case I could already release an unofficial RC3 as I already built

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

intentional top post and another good reason to keep bug related comments on Launchpad. /intentional top post On August 5, 2011 04:03:22 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: 2011/8/5 Greg 'groggy' Lehey groog...@gmail.com On Thursday, 4 August 2011 at 22:33:19 +0200, Harry van der Wolf wrote:

[hugin-ptx] Releasing 2011.2.0 and declaring the next release cycle a bugfix release

Hi all, Thanks to everybody who contributed to zero-in on the fast preview bug. I updated the bug description [0] with a: * Workaround * Affected Systems * Affected Versions * Summary for Developers/Bug Hunters The good news is that we have a workaround. Please test it, especially those who

Re: [hugin-ptx] Releasing 2011.2.0 and declaring the next release cycle a bugfix release

On August 6, 2011 12:16:30 pm Harry van der Wolf wrote: I somehow screwed up. don't worry. it's nearly [0] impossible to screw up with Mercurial. It now turns out that my folder structure holding my local copy of the default branch is now the 2011.2 branch (and I'm sure I didn't do a hg up

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Workflow for manual 16 bit blending of Hugin panoramas using 8 bit gimp

On August 5, 2011 05:45:00 pm torger wrote: Unprocessed JPEG from camera highest quality (cropped the top though for better composition): http://www.torger.org/temp/img_jpg_unprocessed.jpg The clouds are grey, as I imagine they are intended to be. Here's the creative RAW conversion:

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On July 28, 2011 04:26:14 pm Tom Sharpless wrote: My 2 cents. thanks for sharing. It seems to me Hugin has been doing rather well during my time with it. Chaotic, sporadic, but basically going in the right direction. Even madness has method. Even the most finely tuned combustion engine

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Autocrop and calculate optimum size doesn't work for all projections

Hi Henk, On July 29, 2011 04:27:28 pm Henk Tijdink wrote: The number I filed in the bugtracker is 806153. thank you for the detail. I looked into it. Answer at https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/806153 Yuv signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] semi-automatic windows SDK build

On August 2, 2011 03:49:18 pm Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: A set of simple scripts which can be used to automate builds of libraries on windows. The scripts are attached. Thank you! Has anybody picked up on this? The Windows SDK is coming of age. I know Tom and Matthew are working on an updated

Re: [hugin-ptx] long view of street?

On August 1, 2011 10:11:58 AM David Haberthür wrote: Hy Paul. On 01.08.2011, at 11:51, paul womack wrote: In my town we have a nice high street. Like most high streets (in the UK) it's a good deal longer than it is wide (!!). I would like to make an image of all the shop fronts;

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On July 28, 2011 08:18:54 AM kfj wrote: In my experience recreating a software by rewriting takes much less time than the first 'incarnation'. If it can be of any help, the last time such a total rebase happened it took three months. GSoC 2007. Ippei re-organized the codebase. The goal was

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Website update

On July 28, 2011 10:08:25 AM Yuval Levy wrote: On July 28, 2011 01:44:03 AM Terry Duell wrote: This is what happened here with Opera 11.50. I will look into why Opera does not show the red *square*. fixed. http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/2011.2.0/en.shtml the longest part

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Autocrop and calculate optimum size doesn't work for all projections

in Hugin.. nl Hugin 2010.2 RC1, and solved. There was a thread. see:http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/ a4b2748d4a4b49d1/d8d2f51d484f0b87?q=#d8d2f51d484f0b87 On Jul 8, 12:33 am, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: On July 5, 2011 04:19:20 pm Henk Tijdink wrote: Filed

Re: [hugin-ptx] how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

On July 28, 2011 03:46:58 AM Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: According to ohloh [1] the hugin took 65 man years, so it could be quite a lot. I would take ohloh's figures with a grain of salt. It seems to no longer track changes since the project moved from SVN to Hg [2], and yet it gets the Hg changes

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

On July 27, 2011 09:24:25 PM Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Which version should I be trying? hugin-2011.2_beta? Sure. I think any version after 2010.4.0 is good for trying. Terry has been able to reproduce the bug as far back as revision 4808 (which is the last time when major features were

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Feature request: make post-processing with exiftool optional

On July 27, 2011 10:59:03 AM Tom Sharpless wrote: Agree with Nomad that metadata copying should be customisable, and with Markku, that it should be done within the hugin tools, in a way that supports hugin functions first. +1 However both of those sound to me like big projects. there is a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hmmm, no emails from list?

On July 8, 2011 02:36:10 AM Gnome Nomad wrote: I shoot handheld panos every week - I shoot photos of my church's worship service. Here are some of the most recent ones: thanks for sharing. I'm still puzzling out the use of horizontal lines. Cuz I shoot handheld usually, would love to figure

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0 release notes - fixed background image

On July 27, 2011 04:16:48 AM Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: In RC2, I spotted two occurrences of Hugins: in the Images tab, I found Hugins CPFind in the combo, and the Windows tray bar icon hint is Hugins batch processor. Before putting anything in Launchpad, are these were indeed wrong? bad news

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

On July 27, 2011 05:24:44 AM Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: I still have a mono-processor laptop from 2002 running Windows XP. Would it help if I did a few tests on it? sure! the more data points we have, the better. Yuv signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: tweaking enfuse parameters pays

On July 27, 2011 05:05:41 AM kfj wrote: measuring the time-to-satuartion for the cells. Wonder if anyone thought of that? http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=MkDJEBAJdq=measure+time+to+saturation+%2Bphotography coming to a camera in your neighborhood photo shop in 17 years? Yuv

Re: [hugin-ptx] Repository acces in time between release candidates

On July 27, 2011 02:18:10 pm Vaclav Cerny - vatoz wrote: I have also found, that my Czech translation update from default branch ( 723668d8c4cc ) wasn't one of them. 2011.2 with copy of file from default branch will be fully translated and compilable/ installable/runnable. Sorry, this was

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Website update

On July 27, 2011 02:18:44 pm Steve Wesemeyer wrote: At the moment, it looks like a pop-up ad that I can't even close. Got the message. will fix before the release becomes final. Thank you for your honest feedback without which I would not have realized that this was too much in-the-face.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0 RC2 32 bits windows crashes.

Thank you for https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/817104 I got confirmation from Matthew that he used a new SDK to build RC2. It is likely that a number of the newly observed bugs are a consequence of the new SDK. He will get back to Windows users with more information and a strategy moving

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Website update

On July 27, 2011 05:59:38 pm Carl von Einem wrote: How about exchanging the panorama (the one in the header) in the /releases section with with the panorama that is specially featured? the formats and purposes are completely different and I would not want to add restrictions on the featured

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

Hi Lukáš, On July 26, 2011 08:10:28 AM Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: I think this is one of the most serious bugs hugin ever had. What makes you reach this judgment? In my opinion it's some threading issue, because even though it happens very often, it doesn't happen every time. You know more

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

On July 24, 2011 11:52:53 PM Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I've just cloned the hg repository and built the latest version (5345). Thank you for chiming in, your help is appreciated. I had some difficulties building, which I'll mention in a separate message Please do. [0] can use an update,

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0 release notes - fixed background image

On July 26, 2011 10:05:41 AM David Haberthür wrote: The image is not from the Flafleralp, but from the Fafleral. fixed in the repo, should go live at the next scheduled sync. Should I submit a bug-report on launchpad? :) too late :) honest and serious: yes please. *everybody*. reporting

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

On July 26, 2011 08:10:28 AM Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: I think this is one of the most serious bugs hugin ever had. What makes you reach this judgment? Mainly because of the number of users affected by this issue. Yes, it is growing. And I see two drivers of growth that would confirm

[hugin-ptx] Website update

Hi all, prompted by the recent release notes design discussion, I updated the English release notes [0] and made some small changes under the hood of our website. This was more than 36 hours and 4000 visits ago and there was no outcry, so I guess it works. Nevertheless, please test with

Re: [hugin-ptx] Feature request: make post-processing with exiftool optional

On July 26, 2011 03:51:29 PM Tom Sharpless wrote: A year or two ago I submitted a simple patch that adds that option to the preferences tab. https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/679660 consider adding it to the next release. I second the addition. You have write access to the Hugin

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

On July 26, 2011 03:16:43 AM Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I don't like the overview mode (maybe because I don't understand its purpose) the relationship between the preview and the overview is like that between a map of the earth and a globe. The overview shows the globe itself, and you can

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

On July 25, 2011 10:14:08 PM Terry Duell wrote: Time to let the computer cool down a bit while I take a break. thanks for going so quickly through the dissecting process and helping build understanding for this pesky bug! Yuv signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

On July 26, 2011 05:22:42 PM Carl von Einem wrote: I didn't see this issue so far on both of my Macs: the oldish one is a dual processor PowerPC (2x 2.3 GHz, 6.5 GB RAM), the newer one is a dual hexacore Intel Mac with about 24 or 26 GB of RAM. thanks for reporting. what version of OS X are

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Website update

On July 26, 2011 06:15:34 pm JKEngineer wrote: I looked at it using IE8 under Win XP Pro. thanks for the feedback. There's a repeating image at the top with the logo in the right corner. yes, that's the banner. the only new thing here is that the logo is in the right corner, thanks for

[hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

Hi all, We know that the current Hugin is plagued with a pesky spurious bug that is difficult to reproduce. It is causing grievance to a lot of users as seen on the ML and on the main tracker ticket where the bug is discussed [0]. This is most likely caused by a memory leak. The most

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0_rc2 released

On July 24, 2011 09:46:16 AM Tom Sharpless wrote: I do have a local Python, how can I get an 'enabled' hugin for win32/ win64? It's a build-time option. You may have to build it yourself with BUILD_HSI set to ON; or maybe Matthew can build a hugin.exe binary with this option and make it

Re: [hugin-ptx] CRITICAL: join us to nuke the pesky bug that is plaguing the fast preview

Hi Terry, On July 24, 2011 07:21:16 PM Terry Duell wrote: just to clarify, what is this next section (to the -) for? Don't you already have the tarball you want to upload? never upload a tarball without having tested at least that it builds on your machine. the next tarball is up:

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0 release notes

On July 23, 2011 12:04:59 am Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Given that this is part of Hugin, the repeated word Hugin seems redundant. Why not just Lens Calibration Tool? yes, repeating Hugin is redundant indeed. Yuv signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0 release notes - fixed background image

Hi Terry, On July 23, 2011 07:40:32 pm Terry Duell wrote: I have looked at [0] and [1] with Opera 11.5, and both have problems. thanks for the test and quick reply. screenshot hugin-1.jpg shows how Opera renders [1] yes, that's the right hand side bleeding that I mentioned appears in

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0_rc2 released

On July 23, 2011 11:43:54 PM Matthew Petroff wrote: Hugin 2011.2.0-rc2 binaries for Windows are now available. See sourceforge.net downloads page: https://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin/hugin-2011.2_beta/ Thank you! The builds are not Python enabled as I have yet to devise a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.2.0_rc2 released

On July 20, 2011 01:27:46 am Lajos Höss wrote: When will the final version out? (my translation not completed yet, 95% ready) A few translations arrived this week. I will issue an RC3 that will include them. No final version is out without testing, but you can assume that unless there is a

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: 回覆：Autopano-sift-c and win32

On July 20, 2011 05:38:19 am Constantine wrote: Thank you for reply P.S. It'll be better to reflect this in wiki The wiki is self-maintaining - you can create yourself an account there and updated it to reflect the knowledge you acquired and the wiki still lacks. Thanks Yuv signature.asc

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0 release notes

On July 22, 2011 04:51:24 pm Harry van der Wolf wrote: 2011/7/22 zarl c...@einem.net I find three different names for the same tool: - http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/2011.2.0/en.shtml Lens Calibration Tool - http://wiki.panotools.org/Calibrate_lens_gui Calibrate lens

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0 release notes

On July 22, 2011 11:22:06 am zarl wrote: The last paragraph in the Download section should end with a '/p'. fixed all typos, thanks for reviewing and reporting. Yuv signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0_rc2 released

On July 22, 2011 05:02:36 am JeCh wrote: I'm afraid this bug might affect all Windows users This bug affects everybody, but is spurious, i.e. most users don't have any symptoms. If it had manifested itself with symptoms to all Windows users, it would have been caught before. The bug is most

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.2.0_rc2 released

On July 21, 2011 12:33:14 PM Harry van der Wolf wrote: Hi, 2011/7/21 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch When I state that I do not think of it as a show stopper, I am not making a statement about the seriousness of the bug, but rather about our alternatives which are the same we faced when

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.2.0_rc2 released

Hi Terry, On July 20, 2011 08:44:59 pm Terry Duell wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:30:40 +1000, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: The 2011.2.0_rc2 source tarball can be downloaded Builds and runs here OK on Fedora 15 x86_64. thanks for testing. Sorry for the delay with this advice, but I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.2.0_rc1 released

On July 19, 2011 03:06:21 am Harry van der Wolf wrote: Sorry to slow down the process a little no need to apologize for the unknowns inherent in the prediction of software development speed. I'm afraid we need to have an RC2 that's OK. I have skipped the planned beta2 and jumped to an RC

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >