Xie Qian
 
Open System and Chinese Information Processing Center,
Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
P.O. Box 8718, Beijing 100080, CHINA



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hideki Hiura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [I18n] Using XIM - must give up compose keys


> > From: Phillip Vandry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is it possible to use XFree86's builtin IM (XimLocal) which implements
> > compose keys and dead accents and the XIM protocol (XimProto) at the
> > same time? It looks to me like it is not possible.
> 
> Do you specifically want to use XimLocal module and XimProto module at
> the same time? 
> Or you want the local simple composition IM capability and the remote
> complex IM capability at the same time?
> 
> If what you want is the latter, you may want to try IIIM Xlib module
> called xiiimp.so.  By modifying the XIM entry of your 
>     /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/<current locale>/XI18N_OBJS
> from
> 
>   XIM common/ximcp    _XimOpenIM _XimRegisterIMInstantiateCallback 
> _XimUnRegisterIMInstantiateCallback 
> 
> to something like 
> 
>   XIM common/xiiimp _SwitchOpenIM
>   XIM common/xiiimp _XimpLocalOpenIM
>   XIM common/ximp40 _Ximp_OpenIM 
>   XIM common/ximcp _XimOpenIM _XimRegisterIMInstantiateCallback  
> _XimUnRegisterIMInstantiateCallback 
>   XIM common/ximll _XimpLocalOpenIM
>   XIM common/ximlocal _XimpLocalOpenIM
> 
> You can use localIM/remoteIM at the same time, and you can go back and
> forth among them.
> 

Is That all need to do? Doesn't need something else like a modified version xlib, or 
some modification on environment variables setting?

> They are available from openi18n.org.
> 
> > What would be the correct solution?
> 
> I'd like both ximlocal and ximcp/ximp40(R6 and R5 XIM protocol
> modules) and actually all XIM servers to be tapering out, because the
> combination of them does not really provide multilingual solution, its
> old design carries many limitations, and not extensible/flexible. 
> 

I'm absolutely after you on this point, but I doubt if IIIMF is the right solution. To 
me, IIIMF seems too complex, too multi purposed, and too not X! Maybe I'am wrong, but 
I think it worth to try another path.

_______________________________________________
I18n mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n

Reply via email to