On Saturday 19 Sep 2009 8:27:45 am Bill Kerr wrote:
http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2009/09/shape-31.htmlSo, I realised this
was a nice challenge in real maths and understanding of the application of
variables, measurement, ratio, proportion and fractions
I see this as a good example of where
I am interested in the outcome and future direction of SoaS distribution, as
this will serve as input to the future development of OLPC in Bangladesh.
I have not formulated a view yet, as would like to hear both sides. I do not
have extensive knowledge of the technical aspects, however, would
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 22:27, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi all,
Sebastian Dziallas has asked for clarity on how the SoaS distribution
he maintains is going to be treated and considered by SL. It doesn't
seem that there's consensus, so we suggest forming a Decision Panel:
On the
Hi Tabitha,
your offer is well noted and I'll suggest soon specific areas that I
think will be interested to test and hear the thoughts from your team.
About the particular effort of pushing forward one more stable release
for the XO-1, I strongly think we need a single individual that will
lead
I /really, really dislike/ this setting that replies only to the one
sender... :-)
Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
sugaronastick.com is Caroline Meeks, so I believe we are OK there
as to the .org, it would be a certain Peter Robinson (?)
Anyway, while marketing might be a Good Thing when our hearts
It's hard for me to understand why we are dropping so fast support for
the XO-1.
It is not logical, does not make sense to drop the biggest user base
Sugar has, except when we account for human feelings of pain and
betrayal that accompany the lore involving OLPC and such.
While Sugar, as-is,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 16:25, Yamandu Ploskonka yamap...@gmail.com wrote:
It's hard for me to understand why we are dropping so fast support for the
XO-1.
I'm not sure why you say that, who is dropping support for the XO-1?
I'm just pointing out that we need help coordinating the effort of
I'm sorry, I couldn't disagree more. The public has no idea what Sugar
is. Believe me, without marketing, that won't change. We're just at
the beginning, and for now paying marketing expenses out of pocket.
The Sugar on a Stick name and what it means wouldn't matter so much if:
a) GNU/Linux
I'm sorry, I couldn't disagree more. The public has no idea what Sugar
is. Believe me, without marketing, that won't change. We're just at
the beginning, and for now paying marketing expenses out of pocket.
The Sugar on a Stick name and what it means wouldn't matter so much if:
a) GNU/Linux
I am all for Sugar Labs protecting, owning and bestowing the SOaS
monickers, and for full recognition to Sebastian's work (and other's
within the Fedora one, and the other options).
Who will pay?
hmm, problem
Yama
Sean DALY wrote:
I'm sorry, I couldn't disagree more. The public has no idea
Hi,
I am all for Sugar Labs protecting, owning and bestowing the
SOaS monickers, and for full recognition to Sebastian's work (and
other's within the Fedora one, and the other options).
Who will pay?
I don't think anyone needs to pay anything. If we announced that the
SL policy
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090918110925298
http://lwn.net/Articles/353419/
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/09/18/windows_seven_sins_ngos/
Also note that from yesterday morning on, the top Google News result
for Software Freedom Day has been Reuters' reprint of our press
There are several passionate threads happening on various SL mailing
lists. As we push through these discussion I would like remind
participants about a couple of tactics I have learned for successfully
building a consensus on a mailing list.
1. Never take (or make) it personal. Passion is
Hi all,
As subject says, Glucose (and some of Fructose) 0.84.0 and 0.85.7 is now
packaged for Debian!
More info at http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar and
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Debian .
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 00:32, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Hi all,
As subject says, Glucose (and some of Fructose) 0.84.0 and 0.85.7 is now
packaged for Debian!
More info at http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar and
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Debian .
Wow,
ah, I haven't tried a multi-port hub with the Windows LiveUSB creator.
To burn 8 at a time did you open 8 instances of the LiveUSB creator?
Could you do a video? I know it sounds trivial but I think for a teacher its
not trivial and a little 2 minute video where you show how you did it might
give
I tried them out briefly in a VM this morning, worked great.
A couple of questions.
I don't understand the debian work flow. I see that you are carrying
.82, .84, and .85. Will you continue to carry all of them going
forward?
Do you have a recommended work flow for basing downstream packages
Hi David - and everyone else,
[please don't cross-post: respond only to OLPC list as requested]
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:49:00PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
I tried them out briefly in a VM this morning, worked great.
Wauw, you are quick! Good to hear that that at least initial tests work.
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:43:25AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 00:32, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
As subject says, Glucose (and some of Fructose) 0.84.0 and 0.85.7 is
now packaged for Debian!
More info at http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar and
19 matches
Mail list logo
