Re: [IAEP] Voting reminder (3 days for voting on Motion 2017-08-10: Sugar Labs Financial Manager to have a monthly compensation

Motion passes with 4 votes on favor (Samson, Lionel, Adam and Laura). Next step will be to agree on the value of the stipend. I suggested earlier we could start the debate with US$100 /month. keep in mind the deliverables expected are 4 quarterly reports /year (1 complete financial report per

Re: [IAEP] Voting reminder (3 days for voting on Motion 2017-08-10: Sugar Labs Financial Manager to have a monthly compensation

+1 On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Lionel Laské wrote: > Sorry. Miss the motion. > > +1 > > Lionel. > > 2017-08-14 19:32 GMT-07:00 Laura Vargas : > >> Dear Adam and Lionel, >> >> Please share your vote before voting period closes on

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] URGENT action needed

Thanks Karen for please responding to these 3 emails I sent you when possible: - July 12 subject line "Donation from Facebook" [paperwork required so donations can flow to Sugar Labs] - Aug 4 subject line "Donation from Facebook" [paperwork required so donations can flow to Sugar Labs] - Aug 9

Re: [IAEP] Voting reminder (3 days for voting on Motion 2017-08-10: Sugar Labs Financial Manager to have a monthly compensation

Sorry. Miss the motion. +1 Lionel. 2017-08-14 19:32 GMT-07:00 Laura Vargas : > Dear Adam and Lionel, > > Please share your vote before voting period closes on 2017-08-17. I > changed the word compensation for stipend as James suggested but abstained > from adding

Re: [IAEP] Motion to Change The Sugar Labs Rules of Governance

If the election cycle is starting tomorrow, then I agree there's no real need for a recall vote, provided the person(s) in question are up for re-election this year {positions are staggered}. Personally I don't know what's going on here. If someone truly believes a recall vote is in order, then

Re: [IAEP] Motion to Change The Sugar Labs Rules of Governance

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 02:07:04AM +, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > [...] Motion to be voted on by the SLOB members: > > These lines in the Sugar Labs Rules of Governance shall be changed > wherever they occur from: > > "The members of the Oversight Board may be removed from the position > at any

[IAEP] Voting reminder (3 days for voting on Motion 2017-08-10: Sugar Labs Financial Manager to have a monthly compensation

Dear Adam and Lionel, Please share your vote before voting period closes on 2017-08-17. I changed the word compensation for stipend as James suggested but abstained from adding the US$100/monthly compensation suggested. Motion: *Sugar Labs Financial Manager will have a monthly stipend of US$

Re: [IAEP] Motion to Change The Sugar Labs Rules of Governance

I disagree with this. While I have been on boards with an annoying member or two, letting a few board members vote the others off leads to coups and other odd politics. I have never personally seen such language in governing documents before. That said, what is considered a quorum of the

[IAEP] Motion to Change The Sugar Labs Rules of Governance

Dear Fellow Sugar Labs Members Recently the SLOB has become extremely dysfunctional. When this happens to this degree, it may be time to look for a remedy. Sometimes this will best be accomplished by a change in personnel. Here are what some websites have to say about this issue: *

[IAEP] Request to access to Sugar Labs ledger file

Hello Adam, As Sugar Labs Oversight Board member I request you grant *access to Sugar Labs ledger file to all current Sugar Labs Oversight Board members*. Regards and thanks in advance. -- Laura V. * I SomosAZUCAR.Org* “Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.” ~ Laura Victoria Happy

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] URGENT action needed

+1 for James C. The voice of reason speaks! Thank you! From: IAEP on behalf of James Cameron Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 1:57:40 PM To: Laura Vargas Cc: iaep; sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org; OLPC para

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] URGENT action needed

The policy does not apply when the funding comes from an organisation external to SFC. Thanks to OLPC-SF and Hilary! On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 03:00:54PM -0500, Laura Vargas wrote: > Hi Hilary, > > Sugar Labs is a member project of the Software Freedom Conservancy, and so > travel funding is

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] URGENT action needed

Hi Hilary, Sugar Labs is a member project of the Software Freedom Conservancy, and so travel funding is subject to the *Software Freedom Conservancy Travel and Reimbursable Expense Policy.