Re: [IAEP] Seeking insights into Oversight_Board/Decisions

2016-04-11 Thread Dave Crossland
On 11 April 2016 at 14:32, Adam Holt wrote: > > You are thorough enough to consider the fiduciary/stewardship secretary > role outlined below, and/or coaching/mentoring someone younger to assist > you -- would you consider giving back in this way? > Sort of: I don't want to

Re: [IAEP] Seeking insights into Oversight_Board/Decisions

2016-04-11 Thread Dave Crossland
SORRY I shot this off and didn't double check, I think I confused myself because (IIRC) Adam put together the finance wiki page summary and I got confused =) THANK YOU WALTER :D ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)

[IAEP] Seeking insights into Oversight_Board/Decisions

2016-04-11 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Thanks to Adam for putting together https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions - is a great read :) I have some questions about some of the motions, but some are a few years old and perhaps it is no longer easy to answer them - no pressure :) > selectricity This sounds great!

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Action needed on two issues

2016-04-11 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Laura! Thanks for the spreadsheet - this is great! On 10 April 2016 at 23:57, Laura Vargas wrote: > According to the published numbers (I'm attaching a Spreadsheet with the > information published by you) for the last 4 years, ~80% (USD$26,400) of > expenses are

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Action needed on two issues

2016-04-09 Thread Dave Crossland
On 9 April 2016 at 11:26, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > I also agree that $500 does seem excessive, and even inappropriate FWIW, I thought it was small; it is under minimum wage for some places. ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project

Re: [IAEP] Motions to create position of Translation-Community Manager

2016-04-08 Thread Dave Crossland
On 5 April 2016 at 05:32, Tony Anderson wrote: > I move that the SugarLabs Oversight Board approve the position of > Translation-Community Manager as described at > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Translation-Community_Manager. > > I further move that Chris Leonard be named

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motions to create position of Translation-Community Manager

2016-04-08 Thread Dave Crossland
On 7 April 2016 at 13:33, Sebastian Silva <sebast...@fuentelibre.org> wrote: > > > El 06/04/16 a las 10:30, Dave Crossland escribió: > > On 6 April 2016 at 03:25, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > >> Wiki technology is a bad match for decision mak

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motions to create position of Translation-Community Manager

2016-04-07 Thread Dave Crossland
Not used it, would like to :) Yep, definitely for design docs! :) ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motions to create position of Translation-Community Manager

2016-04-06 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Lionel! On 6 April 2016 at 15:56, Lionel Laské wrote: > I'm just considering that the limited resources of SugarLabs should be > dedicated in priority to increase the community and I'm not convinced at > all that translation is the better way. At least the ratio cost

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motions to create position of Translation-Community Manager

2016-04-06 Thread Dave Crossland
On 6 April 2016 at 10:44, Walter Bender wrote: > Does the traffic include deliberation of motions? :) >> > > Never intentionally. When it does happen, we try to catch the mistake, > such as Adam reminding Tony to circulate his motion publicly, > I think this is all

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Motions to create position of Translation-Community Manager

2016-04-06 Thread Dave Crossland
On 6 April 2016 at 09:42, Walter Bender wrote: > the traffic on the list is close to nil Does the traffic include deliberation of motions? :) ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)

Re: [IAEP] Motions to create position of Translation-Community Manager

2016-04-06 Thread Dave Crossland
On 6 April 2016 at 03:25, James Cameron wrote: > The hiding of SLOBs deliberations once they move to their private > mailing list > Why is the SLOB list private? ___ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)

Re: [IAEP] FW: Commenting on Treasurer Motions Enabled!

2016-04-06 Thread Dave Crossland
On 6 April 2016 at 04:58, Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > >> I agree that it would be awesome if someone holding the Treasurer office >> was also actively fund raising for the proje

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

2016-04-05 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Samson Great proposal - and glad to hear you are feeling better :) I have 2 questions :) 1. You write in the proposal, the reason why the Yoruba was the most expensive, was because the logistics Portable internet and internet plan was included, two laptop was included too. I am curious

Re: [IAEP] Long term, medium term, short term objectives (Local Labs 2011)

2016-04-05 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Great stuff - I've added it to the talk page where I've been collecting similar related links https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Vision_proposal_2016 On 5 April 2016 at 06:51, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Hi Dave, Lionel, > > To follow up with the discussion at last

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs Membership List Review?

2016-04-04 Thread Dave Crossland
On 4 April 2016 at 13:10, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Is there something wrong with this list? To clarify, the list is already published at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members/List :) ___ IAEP -- It's An Education

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs Membership List Review?

2016-04-04 Thread Dave Crossland
Thanks! I've added a note to the wiki page On 4 April 2016 at 10:59, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote: > It was last revisited in January. > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> http://wik

[IAEP] Sugar Labs Membership List Review?

2016-04-04 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi! http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Members says, The Membership and Elections Committee will review the membership list for currency once per year. Any member may join this committee, which is currently staffed by Sebastian Silva, Samson Goddy, and Caryl Bigenho. When the membership

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] quarterly or semiannual financials/vibrancy/transparency around Sugar Labs' 1st hire

2016-04-04 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Chris! On 4 April 2016 at 01:23, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > > On another note, and sorry that I missed this as it was surely stated > > elsewhere, but, what is the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] quarterly or semiannual financials/vibrancy/transparency around Sugar Labs' 1st hire

2016-04-03 Thread Dave Crossland
On 3 April 2016 at 19:52, Walter Bender wrote: > the wiki page was the appropriate place to add ... reporting requirements I note that Walter did update that wiki page today, but did not add any further requirements to what Tony had drafted in the last few days.

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder

2016-04-01 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi On 31 March 2016 at 04:02, Samson Goddy wrote: > I will suggest that the samson proposal should be taken first in the > meeting tomorrow. the meeting is 8pm by nigerian time and the cyber > cafe i will using closes by 9pm. so i dont want to miss out. > On 1 April 2016

[IAEP] International Society for Technology in Education 2016 Conference and Expo?

2016-03-30 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Is anyone involved in Sugar Labs going to https://conference.iste.org/2016/ ? Has anyone gone from SL attended previous years? ISTE 2016 says it is "the premier education technology conference," and will be held June 26-29 in Denver, Colorado, USA. -- Cheers Dave

Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder

2016-03-30 Thread Dave Crossland
On 30 March 2016 at 20:20, Walter Bender wrote: > 7. Treasurer position and process (Adam and Caryl) See [1] > ... [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/16jIFuZ9bX > -Bv675BpA1KmcEcRcX4PRCOUEX0ICRUkOc/edit I read the doc and the structure of the policy seems good,

<    1   2   3   4   5   6