Hi all,
Background:
Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other
FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar
stimulates(at least should) doing not just using, our audience could
have additional layers - teachers for examples. Projects
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, the question is should we have special place to treat such issues
in convenient and casual developer/requester friendly manner.
-1
1. Fragmentation is bad. We should instead attempt to unify our
development sites under an interface that is both friendly to novices and
Excellent suggestion!
+1
Tomeu
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 17:50, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Background:
Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other
FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar
stimulates(at least
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Background:
Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other
FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific nature - sugar
stimulates(at least should) doing not just using, our
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:58:17AM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
So, the question is should we have special place to treat such issues
in convenient and casual developer/requester friendly manner.
-1
1. Fragmentation is bad. We should instead attempt to unify
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:16:29PM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Aleksey Lim wrote:
collab.sl.o shouldn't be
development site but central point there devs, users, doers, educators
meet. Thus it shouldn't dublicate sites like wiki/track/etc.
What do you mean by meet? Are you
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:05:31PM -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
Background:
Step in issue, sugar is not unique here, thats the problem for other
FOSS projects as well. But sugar has it's own specific
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:15:46PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
I personally like what Greg Smith did back at OLPC:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_requests
does anyone know the right ml link for
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Feature_roadmap#Overview -- now it points to
