Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Arbitration request: Caryl Bigenho a first warning for moderation [WAS: Re: Improving our Code of Conduct (was: Re: Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

Dear Community, I just want to underline to the community that I have accepted Bert's decision: On October 24 Bert wrote to SLOBs: "What I would recommend is something like a public statement by the SLOBs that calls for starting a civilized, courteous discussion despite all the personal

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Arbitration request: Caryl Bigenho a first warning for moderation [WAS: Re: Improving our Code of Conduct (was: Re: Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

Dear Laura, Caryl, all. I have tried for the past 4 weeks to mediate between you and Caryl, and some other outspoken members of the Sugar Labs community. Unfortunately, I have failed. My decision in this arbitration was to not give Caryl a warning, but to call for a more polite tone in the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Arbitration request: Caryl Bigenho a first warning for moderation [WAS: Re: Improving our Code of Conduct (was: Re: Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

Dear Ombudsman, On yesterday's meeting I was publicly remarked by Walter Bender as having made a "charge of harassment" twice: 19:02 walterbender Before we get to the agenda, I just want to report publicly that I

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Arbitration request: Caryl Bigenho a first warning for moderation [WAS: Re: Improving our Code of Conduct (was: Re: Code of Conduct Motion to add Anti-harassment policy - Sugar Labs

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Laura Vargas wrote: > Dear SLOBs and community members; > > cc Ombusman > > > We need to clearly state every member when interacting within the Sugar > Labs project channels is expected to serve as an example for children. > > This is