Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

Yeah +1 ibiam On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Chihurumnaya Ibiam < ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I totally agree with "We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments > as we now speak about OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs > and mobile devices with xo being

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

I totally agree with "We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments as we now speak about OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs and mobile devices with xo being considered as one of the supported environments". I think we limited ourselves to an extent on OLPC deployments,

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

+1. On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > Hi, All > > I certainly appreciate the attention my email has received. However, I am > disappointed that the responses do not reflect my main concern. I beleive > Sugar and Sugar Labs will fade away if it

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

Hi, All I certainly appreciate the attention my email has received. However, I am disappointed that the responses do not reflect my main concern. I beleive Sugar and Sugar Labs will fade away if it continues to be perceived as the software that comes on an XO. I believe Sugar Labs and Sugar

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

There is a IAEP thread "Preparing for the 2017 SLOB Election" in early August that has more details about all this. First, I want to note that while an 'election committee' has been mentioned, Walter said in that earlier thread: I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approve individual

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

e more >> >>> candidates than seats. Right? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Laura >> >>> >> >>> 2016-12-01 16:06 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho <cbige...@hotmail.com>: >> >>> >> >>>>

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

ittee because I am very > involved > >>>> in setting up an OSSIE track for SCaLE. I don't know who is on the > >>>> committee this time or what their time table is. It probably should be > >>>> finalized at tomorrow's meeting. > >>>>

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

is on the >>>> committee this time or what their time table is. It probably should be >>>> finalized at tomorrow's meeting. >>>> >>>> >>>> Caryl >>>> -- >>>> *From:* Laura Vargas <la...@somosazuca

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

time table is. It probably should be >>> finalized at tomorrow's meeting. >>> >>> >>> Caryl >>> ------ >>> *From:* Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37:16 PM

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

gas <la...@somosazucar.org> >> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37:16 PM >> *To:* Caryl Bigenho; Dave Crossland >> *Cc:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org; samson >> goddy; Tony Anderson >> >> *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sug

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

- > *From:* Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> > *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37:16 PM > *To:* Caryl Bigenho; Dave Crossland > *Cc:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org; samson goddy; > Tony Anderson > > *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLO

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

: Laura Vargas <la...@somosazucar.org> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37:16 PM To: Caryl Bigenho; Dave Crossland Cc: SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org; samson goddy; Tony Anderson Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs Caryl, I Agree with you, we should be p

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

ehalf of Laura Vargas > <la...@somosazucar.org> > *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:13:55 AM > *To:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org > *Cc:* Tony Anderson; Dave Crossland > *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs > > Hi all! > > I am

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

rLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org Cc: Tony Anderson; Dave Crossland Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs Hi all! I am really interested in continue helping the community to shape it's vision for the following 10-15 years. I believe society in general, needs urgently to rescue respect f

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

Hi all! I am really interested in continue helping the community to shape it's vision for the following 10-15 years. I believe society in general, needs urgently to rescue respect for the voice of women and young girls, specially in free/libre-culture/software projects. That said I have found

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

The discussion stopped because we are waiting for Sameer to publish the second episode of his video about the process of formally defining a vision, mission, goals, tasks and doing a swot analysis and so on. Sameer proposed and I think we all agreed that each of us throwing our own unilateral

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

I might quibble a bit with some of the wording but I am good with this. I'll work on another draft before tomorrow's meeting (19UTC on irc.freenode.net). regards. -walter On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > The December meetings is coming soon. At the